引入额外角色报销计划对英格兰全科护理人员队伍的影响》。

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Alison Leary, Geoffrey Punshon, Angie Hack, Dave Bushe, Crystal Oldman
{"title":"引入额外角色报销计划对英格兰全科护理人员队伍的影响》。","authors":"Alison Leary, Geoffrey Punshon, Angie Hack, Dave Bushe, Crystal Oldman","doi":"10.1177/21501319241298759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>To understand the impact of introducing Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) on the General Practice Nurse (GPN) workforce. A workforce/people impact assessment designed as a cross-sectional survey of a stratified sample of 900 GPN on the Queen's Nursing Institute mailing list.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A workforce/people impact assessment was designed based on the UKCS 2014 piloted and distributed as a cross-sectional survey via a survey platform. This included questions on level of impact, kind of impact and perception of prior engagement. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey consisted of 21 questions (531 responses, response rate of 60%). ARRS deployment appears to have impacted the GPN workforce in several ways. There was positive impact on workloads from ARRS roles working in original scope, for example pharmacists medicine reviews. However, any benefit was offset by the increased workloads created by those new to general practice and/or working outside of traditional scope. This ranged from a lack of resources to provide the support those new to primary care require to practice safely, the expectations of others-that GPN will fill the gap in support and teaching to GPN directly safety netting the work of others. There was a lack of consultation regarding a major workforce change, leading to feelings of devaluation. There are some significant equity issues highlighted particularly around pay and opportunity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of ARRS has had some positive but mostly negative impact on the workload and introduced pay inequity issues on GPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"21501319241298759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of the Introduction of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme on the General Practice Nursing Workforce in England.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Leary, Geoffrey Punshon, Angie Hack, Dave Bushe, Crystal Oldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21501319241298759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>To understand the impact of introducing Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) on the General Practice Nurse (GPN) workforce. A workforce/people impact assessment designed as a cross-sectional survey of a stratified sample of 900 GPN on the Queen's Nursing Institute mailing list.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A workforce/people impact assessment was designed based on the UKCS 2014 piloted and distributed as a cross-sectional survey via a survey platform. This included questions on level of impact, kind of impact and perception of prior engagement. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey consisted of 21 questions (531 responses, response rate of 60%). ARRS deployment appears to have impacted the GPN workforce in several ways. There was positive impact on workloads from ARRS roles working in original scope, for example pharmacists medicine reviews. However, any benefit was offset by the increased workloads created by those new to general practice and/or working outside of traditional scope. This ranged from a lack of resources to provide the support those new to primary care require to practice safely, the expectations of others-that GPN will fill the gap in support and teaching to GPN directly safety netting the work of others. There was a lack of consultation regarding a major workforce change, leading to feelings of devaluation. There are some significant equity issues highlighted particularly around pay and opportunity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of ARRS has had some positive but mostly negative impact on the workload and introduced pay inequity issues on GPN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"21501319241298759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241298759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241298759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言/目标:了解引入 "额外角色报销计划"(ARRS)对全科护士(GPN)队伍的影响。对女王护理研究所邮件列表中的 900 名全科护士进行分层抽样,设计劳动力/人员影响评估:根据英国护理标准(UKCS)2014 试行版设计了劳动力/人员影响评估,并通过调查平台进行横向调查。其中包括有关影响程度、影响种类和对先前参与的看法等问题。采用描述性统计和内容分析法对数据进行了分析:调查包括 21 个问题(531 个回复,回复率为 60%)。ARRS 的部署似乎在多个方面对全球网络的员工队伍产生了影响。在原有范围内工作的 ARRS 职务对工作量产生了积极影响,例如药剂师的药品审查。然而,新加入全科医生和/或在传统范围外工作的人员增加的工作量抵消了任何好处。这包括缺乏资源,无法为新加入全科医疗的人员提供安全执业所需的支持,其他人期望全科医疗人员将填补支持和教学方面的空白,以及全科医疗人员直接为其他人的工作提供安全网。对于劳动力的重大变化缺乏协商,导致人们感到被贬低。结论:结论:ARRS 的引入对 GPN 的工作量产生了一些积极影响,但大部分是消极影响,并引入了薪酬不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of the Introduction of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme on the General Practice Nursing Workforce in England.

Introduction/objectives: To understand the impact of introducing Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) on the General Practice Nurse (GPN) workforce. A workforce/people impact assessment designed as a cross-sectional survey of a stratified sample of 900 GPN on the Queen's Nursing Institute mailing list.

Method: A workforce/people impact assessment was designed based on the UKCS 2014 piloted and distributed as a cross-sectional survey via a survey platform. This included questions on level of impact, kind of impact and perception of prior engagement. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

Results: The survey consisted of 21 questions (531 responses, response rate of 60%). ARRS deployment appears to have impacted the GPN workforce in several ways. There was positive impact on workloads from ARRS roles working in original scope, for example pharmacists medicine reviews. However, any benefit was offset by the increased workloads created by those new to general practice and/or working outside of traditional scope. This ranged from a lack of resources to provide the support those new to primary care require to practice safely, the expectations of others-that GPN will fill the gap in support and teaching to GPN directly safety netting the work of others. There was a lack of consultation regarding a major workforce change, leading to feelings of devaluation. There are some significant equity issues highlighted particularly around pay and opportunity.

Conclusion: The introduction of ARRS has had some positive but mostly negative impact on the workload and introduced pay inequity issues on GPN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信