急诊科虚拟分诊的注意事项。

Q3 Medicine
Laila Nasser, Emily Morris, Irene Mathias, Justin N Hall
{"title":"急诊科虚拟分诊的注意事项。","authors":"Laila Nasser, Emily Morris, Irene Mathias, Justin N Hall","doi":"10.1177/08404704241298643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health leaders are increasingly interested in harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to remotely conduct virtual triage for Emergency Department (ED) patients. This study explores equity considerations and patient attitudes to virtual triage in a Canadian ED. A cross-sectional study surveyed 150 ED patients, with 32 additional patients interviewed in-depth. Descriptive statistics and qualitative descriptive methodology were employed. 84.7% of patients would consider virtual triage. 71.3% were comfortable following advice to seek alternate care, including their General Practitioner or virtual ED. Approximately 38.2% of patients >60 years would require assistance using virtual triage, with confidence in using technology to direct care decreasing with age. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: value of decision support; care access expectations; technological literacy demographics; trust in AI; and confidentiality. In conclusion, virtual triage is a viable and promising tool if barriers to technological literacy are addressed, and tools are endorsed by health providers and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704241298643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations for emergency department virtual triage.\",\"authors\":\"Laila Nasser, Emily Morris, Irene Mathias, Justin N Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08404704241298643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health leaders are increasingly interested in harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to remotely conduct virtual triage for Emergency Department (ED) patients. This study explores equity considerations and patient attitudes to virtual triage in a Canadian ED. A cross-sectional study surveyed 150 ED patients, with 32 additional patients interviewed in-depth. Descriptive statistics and qualitative descriptive methodology were employed. 84.7% of patients would consider virtual triage. 71.3% were comfortable following advice to seek alternate care, including their General Practitioner or virtual ED. Approximately 38.2% of patients >60 years would require assistance using virtual triage, with confidence in using technology to direct care decreasing with age. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: value of decision support; care access expectations; technological literacy demographics; trust in AI; and confidentiality. In conclusion, virtual triage is a viable and promising tool if barriers to technological literacy are addressed, and tools are endorsed by health providers and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8404704241298643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241298643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241298643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗领导者对利用人工智能(AI)远程对急诊科(ED)患者进行虚拟分诊越来越感兴趣。本研究探讨了加拿大一家急诊室对虚拟分诊的公平性考虑和患者态度。这项横断面研究调查了 150 名急诊室患者,并对另外 32 名患者进行了深入访谈。研究采用了描述性统计和定性描述方法。84.7%的患者会考虑使用虚拟分诊。71.3%的患者愿意听从建议寻求其他医疗服务,包括全科医生或虚拟急诊室。年龄大于 60 岁的患者中约有 38.2% 需要虚拟分诊的帮助,使用技术指导护理的信心随年龄增长而降低。主题分析揭示了五个关键主题:决策支持的价值;获得护理的期望;技术知识人口统计学;对人工智能的信任;保密性。总之,如果能解决技术素养方面的障碍,并得到医疗服务提供者和患者的认可,虚拟分诊是一种可行且前景广阔的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations for emergency department virtual triage.

Health leaders are increasingly interested in harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to remotely conduct virtual triage for Emergency Department (ED) patients. This study explores equity considerations and patient attitudes to virtual triage in a Canadian ED. A cross-sectional study surveyed 150 ED patients, with 32 additional patients interviewed in-depth. Descriptive statistics and qualitative descriptive methodology were employed. 84.7% of patients would consider virtual triage. 71.3% were comfortable following advice to seek alternate care, including their General Practitioner or virtual ED. Approximately 38.2% of patients >60 years would require assistance using virtual triage, with confidence in using technology to direct care decreasing with age. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: value of decision support; care access expectations; technological literacy demographics; trust in AI; and confidentiality. In conclusion, virtual triage is a viable and promising tool if barriers to technological literacy are addressed, and tools are endorsed by health providers and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信