[文章翻译]内侧筋膜皮瓣作为治疗腿部软组织缺损的替代方法。

Q3 Medicine
X Ríos Garrido, A De la Rosa, L Arzuza Ortega, G Vargas Lievano, J Molina Gándara, D A Tellez Gamarra, C Medina Monje
{"title":"[文章翻译]内侧筋膜皮瓣作为治疗腿部软组织缺损的替代方法。","authors":"X Ríos Garrido, A De la Rosa, L Arzuza Ortega, G Vargas Lievano, J Molina Gándara, D A Tellez Gamarra, C Medina Monje","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selecting the right technique for lower limb soft tissue reconstruction is a therapeutic challenge. Despite having several reconstruction options, it's important to choose a technique that is effective and with the least possible donor site morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of the medial tab flap in soft tissue reconstruction on the leg, compared to conventional flaps. Materials and methods Cohort study matched by age. 64 patients with soft tissue defects were selected and according to the intervention divided in: group 1) medial tab flap, and group 2) conventional flaps (sural, soleus, gastrocnemius) followed up to one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Outcome variables: </strong>surgical time in minutes, healing, healing time in days, complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients who underwent surgery with medial tab flap and with conventional flaps healed completely. The healing time was 16.2 ± 11.2 days in the tab flap and 16.1 ± 11.2 days in conventional flaps, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P = .89).The surgical time for tab flaps was 225.2 ± 117.8 minutes, and 191.3 ± 117.2 minutes for the comparison flaps (P = .65), there were no statistically significant differences. There were no complications in the medial tab flaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that the medial tab flap technique is as effective as the conventional flap technique, with complete flap survival and healing, and without any major complications in this studied group.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Artículo traducido] Colgajo fasciocutáneo tipo lengüeta medial como alternativa para el manejo de defectos de tejidos blandos en la pierna.\",\"authors\":\"X Ríos Garrido, A De la Rosa, L Arzuza Ortega, G Vargas Lievano, J Molina Gándara, D A Tellez Gamarra, C Medina Monje\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selecting the right technique for lower limb soft tissue reconstruction is a therapeutic challenge. Despite having several reconstruction options, it's important to choose a technique that is effective and with the least possible donor site morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of the medial tab flap in soft tissue reconstruction on the leg, compared to conventional flaps. Materials and methods Cohort study matched by age. 64 patients with soft tissue defects were selected and according to the intervention divided in: group 1) medial tab flap, and group 2) conventional flaps (sural, soleus, gastrocnemius) followed up to one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Outcome variables: </strong>surgical time in minutes, healing, healing time in days, complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients who underwent surgery with medial tab flap and with conventional flaps healed completely. The healing time was 16.2 ± 11.2 days in the tab flap and 16.1 ± 11.2 days in conventional flaps, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P = .89).The surgical time for tab flaps was 225.2 ± 117.8 minutes, and 191.3 ± 117.2 minutes for the comparison flaps (P = .65), there were no statistically significant differences. There were no complications in the medial tab flaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that the medial tab flap technique is as effective as the conventional flap technique, with complete flap survival and healing, and without any major complications in this studied group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择正确的下肢软组织重建技术是一项治疗挑战。尽管有多种重建方法可供选择,但重要的是要选择一种有效且供体部位发病率最低的技术:与传统皮瓣相比,证明内侧皮瓣在腿部软组织重建中的治疗效果。材料和方法 按年龄匹配的队列研究。选取64名软组织缺损患者,根据干预方式分为:第1组(内侧皮瓣)和第2组(传统皮瓣(硬韧带、比目鱼肌、腓肠肌)),随访至术后一年。结果变量:手术时间(分钟)、愈合情况、愈合时间(天)、并发症:结果:使用内侧皮瓣和传统皮瓣手术的患者完全愈合。标签皮瓣的愈合时间为(16.2 ± 11.2)天,传统皮瓣的愈合时间为(16.1 ± 11.2)天,组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.89)。内侧皮瓣未出现并发症:结论:研究结果表明,内侧标签皮瓣技术与传统皮瓣技术一样有效,皮瓣完全存活和愈合,并且在研究组中没有出现任何重大并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Artículo traducido] Colgajo fasciocutáneo tipo lengüeta medial como alternativa para el manejo de defectos de tejidos blandos en la pierna.

Background: Selecting the right technique for lower limb soft tissue reconstruction is a therapeutic challenge. Despite having several reconstruction options, it's important to choose a technique that is effective and with the least possible donor site morbidity.

Objective: Demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of the medial tab flap in soft tissue reconstruction on the leg, compared to conventional flaps. Materials and methods Cohort study matched by age. 64 patients with soft tissue defects were selected and according to the intervention divided in: group 1) medial tab flap, and group 2) conventional flaps (sural, soleus, gastrocnemius) followed up to one year postoperatively.

Outcome variables: surgical time in minutes, healing, healing time in days, complications.

Results: The patients who underwent surgery with medial tab flap and with conventional flaps healed completely. The healing time was 16.2 ± 11.2 days in the tab flap and 16.1 ± 11.2 days in conventional flaps, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P = .89).The surgical time for tab flaps was 225.2 ± 117.8 minutes, and 191.3 ± 117.2 minutes for the comparison flaps (P = .65), there were no statistically significant differences. There were no complications in the medial tab flaps.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the medial tab flap technique is as effective as the conventional flap technique, with complete flap survival and healing, and without any major complications in this studied group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信