招募社会经济地位较低的年轻人参与戒烟移动干预形成性评估的可行性。

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/194164
Michael Wakeman, Sherine El-Toukhy
{"title":"招募社会经济地位较低的年轻人参与戒烟移动干预形成性评估的可行性。","authors":"Michael Wakeman, Sherine El-Toukhy","doi":"10.18332/tpc/194164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Participant recruitment is critical to the success of smoking cessation trials. However, recruitment feasibility studies for inclusion and exclusion criteria commonly used in smoking cessation research remain scarce. We assessed the feasibility of recruiting potential research volunteers (PRVs) under two sets of inclusion criteria to inform eligibility requirements for a smoking cessation mobile intervention trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited PRVs nationwide to participate in qualitative evaluation of a smoking cessation mobile application. To be eligible under Criteria I, participants were aged 18-29 years, neither four-year college graduates nor enrollees, exclusive cigarette smokers, willing to quit within 30 days, and not using cessation aids. Criteria II expanded eligibility to those using cigarettes and non-combustible tobacco products (e.g. e-cigarettes) and willing to quit within 6 months. We calculated recruitment yields and associated costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10533 PRVs screened for eligibility, 48 were enrolled. Only 54 (0.5%) participants qualified under Criteria I and 164 (1.6%) under Criteria II. Age ineligibility was the top reason for exclusion (66.7%), whereas lifetime smoking, quit timeframe, and other tobacco product use contributed to ineligibility rates ranging from 46.5% to 65.3%. Enrolled participants were equally split by sex and roughly reflected the racial/ethnic composition of the United States. American Indians, who have the highest smoking prevalence, were <5% of enrolled participants. Recruitment costs averaged $106 per PRV.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eligibility requirements used in cessation trials were restrictive for recruitment efforts. Relaxing inclusion criteria will reflect current tobacco use patterns and facilitate the timely completion of trials within budgetary thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of recruiting young adults with low socioeconomic status for formative evaluation of a smoking cessation mobile intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Wakeman, Sherine El-Toukhy\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tpc/194164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Participant recruitment is critical to the success of smoking cessation trials. However, recruitment feasibility studies for inclusion and exclusion criteria commonly used in smoking cessation research remain scarce. We assessed the feasibility of recruiting potential research volunteers (PRVs) under two sets of inclusion criteria to inform eligibility requirements for a smoking cessation mobile intervention trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited PRVs nationwide to participate in qualitative evaluation of a smoking cessation mobile application. To be eligible under Criteria I, participants were aged 18-29 years, neither four-year college graduates nor enrollees, exclusive cigarette smokers, willing to quit within 30 days, and not using cessation aids. Criteria II expanded eligibility to those using cigarettes and non-combustible tobacco products (e.g. e-cigarettes) and willing to quit within 6 months. We calculated recruitment yields and associated costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10533 PRVs screened for eligibility, 48 were enrolled. Only 54 (0.5%) participants qualified under Criteria I and 164 (1.6%) under Criteria II. Age ineligibility was the top reason for exclusion (66.7%), whereas lifetime smoking, quit timeframe, and other tobacco product use contributed to ineligibility rates ranging from 46.5% to 65.3%. Enrolled participants were equally split by sex and roughly reflected the racial/ethnic composition of the United States. American Indians, who have the highest smoking prevalence, were <5% of enrolled participants. Recruitment costs averaged $106 per PRV.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eligibility requirements used in cessation trials were restrictive for recruitment efforts. Relaxing inclusion criteria will reflect current tobacco use patterns and facilitate the timely completion of trials within budgetary thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/194164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/194164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:参与者招募对于戒烟试验的成功至关重要。然而,针对戒烟研究中常用的纳入和排除标准进行的招募可行性研究仍然很少。我们评估了在两套纳入标准下招募潜在研究志愿者(PRV)的可行性,以了解戒烟移动干预试验的资格要求:我们在全国范围内邀请潜在研究志愿者参与戒烟移动应用的定性评估。根据标准 I,参与者年龄在 18-29 岁之间,既非四年制大学毕业生,也非在校学生,只吸烟,愿意在 30 天内戒烟,且未使用戒烟辅助工具。标准 II 将参与者资格扩大到使用香烟和非燃烧烟草制品(如电子烟)且愿意在 6 个月内戒烟者。我们计算了招募率和相关成本:在筛选出的 10533 名符合条件的 PRV 中,有 48 人被招募。只有 54 人(0.5%)符合标准 I,164 人(1.6%)符合标准 II。年龄不符合标准是被排除在外的首要原因(66.7%),而终生吸烟、戒烟时限和使用其他烟草制品则导致不符合标准的比例从 46.5% 到 65.3%不等。注册参与者的性别比例相当,大致反映了美国的种族/民族构成。美国印第安人的吸烟率最高,但他们也被排除在外:戒烟试验中使用的资格要求对招募工作具有限制性。放宽纳入标准将反映当前的烟草使用模式,并有助于在预算范围内及时完成试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of recruiting young adults with low socioeconomic status for formative evaluation of a smoking cessation mobile intervention.

Introduction: Participant recruitment is critical to the success of smoking cessation trials. However, recruitment feasibility studies for inclusion and exclusion criteria commonly used in smoking cessation research remain scarce. We assessed the feasibility of recruiting potential research volunteers (PRVs) under two sets of inclusion criteria to inform eligibility requirements for a smoking cessation mobile intervention trial.

Methods: We invited PRVs nationwide to participate in qualitative evaluation of a smoking cessation mobile application. To be eligible under Criteria I, participants were aged 18-29 years, neither four-year college graduates nor enrollees, exclusive cigarette smokers, willing to quit within 30 days, and not using cessation aids. Criteria II expanded eligibility to those using cigarettes and non-combustible tobacco products (e.g. e-cigarettes) and willing to quit within 6 months. We calculated recruitment yields and associated costs.

Results: Of 10533 PRVs screened for eligibility, 48 were enrolled. Only 54 (0.5%) participants qualified under Criteria I and 164 (1.6%) under Criteria II. Age ineligibility was the top reason for exclusion (66.7%), whereas lifetime smoking, quit timeframe, and other tobacco product use contributed to ineligibility rates ranging from 46.5% to 65.3%. Enrolled participants were equally split by sex and roughly reflected the racial/ethnic composition of the United States. American Indians, who have the highest smoking prevalence, were <5% of enrolled participants. Recruitment costs averaged $106 per PRV.

Conclusions: Eligibility requirements used in cessation trials were restrictive for recruitment efforts. Relaxing inclusion criteria will reflect current tobacco use patterns and facilitate the timely completion of trials within budgetary thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信