David Hong, Seung Hun Lee, Jihye Heo, Doosup Shin, Juhee Cho, Eliseo Guallar, Hyun Sung Joh, Hyun Kuk Kim, Junho Ha, Ki Hong Choi, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Danbee Kang, Joo Myung Lee
{"title":"中度冠状动脉狭窄和延期血管重建患者抗血小板疗法的安全性和有效性。","authors":"David Hong, Seung Hun Lee, Jihye Heo, Doosup Shin, Juhee Cho, Eliseo Guallar, Hyun Sung Joh, Hyun Kuk Kim, Junho Ha, Ki Hong Choi, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Danbee Kang, Joo Myung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>This study investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their fractional flow reserve (FFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4657 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR were identified from 2013 to 2020. FFR was indicated in patients with no prior evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50%-70%) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to whether antiplatelet therapy was initiated after the index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during a 5-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, there were 1634 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group and 1634 in the nonantiplatelet therapy group. The risk of MACCE was similar between the 2 groups (24.8% vs 24.7%; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.84-1.13; P = 0.745). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in the antiplatelet therapy group than in the nonantiplatelet therapy group (2.2% vs 1.2%; aHR, 2.07; 95%CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were similar in subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR, antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding without reducing the risk of future ischemic events.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis and deferred revascularization.\",\"authors\":\"David Hong, Seung Hun Lee, Jihye Heo, Doosup Shin, Juhee Cho, Eliseo Guallar, Hyun Sung Joh, Hyun Kuk Kim, Junho Ha, Ki Hong Choi, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Danbee Kang, Joo Myung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rec.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>This study investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their fractional flow reserve (FFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4657 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR were identified from 2013 to 2020. FFR was indicated in patients with no prior evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50%-70%) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to whether antiplatelet therapy was initiated after the index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during a 5-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, there were 1634 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group and 1634 in the nonantiplatelet therapy group. The risk of MACCE was similar between the 2 groups (24.8% vs 24.7%; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.84-1.13; P = 0.745). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in the antiplatelet therapy group than in the nonantiplatelet therapy group (2.2% vs 1.2%; aHR, 2.07; 95%CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were similar in subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR, antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding without reducing the risk of future ischemic events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.11.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.11.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介和目的:本研究调查了因分数血流储备(FFR)而接受延期血管重建术的中度冠状动脉狭窄患者接受抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性:利用韩国国民健康保险服务数据库开展了一项全国性队列研究。2013年至2020年间,共有4657名中度冠状动脉狭窄患者因FFR而接受了延期血管再通手术。FFR适用于既往无心肌缺血证据,且经定量冠状动脉造影确定为中度冠状动脉狭窄(50%-70%)的患者。根据患者是否在指数手术后开始抗血小板治疗进行分类。主要疗效指标是5年随访期间的主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE),即全因死亡、心肌梗死、非计划性血管重建和中风的复合指标。主要的安全性结果是胃肠道出血:经过倾向评分匹配后,抗血小板治疗组和非抗血小板治疗组分别有 1634 名和 1634 名患者。两组患者发生 MACCE 的风险相似(24.8% vs 24.7%;调整后 HR,0.97;95%CI,0.84-1.13;P = 0.745)。抗血小板治疗组的胃肠道出血风险高于非抗血小板治疗组(2.2% vs 1.2%;aHR,2.07;95%CI,1.08-4.00)。这些结果在亚组分析中相似:结论:对于因FFR而接受延期血管重建的中度冠状动脉狭窄患者,抗血小板治疗可能会增加胃肠道出血的风险,而不会降低未来缺血性事件的风险。
Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis and deferred revascularization.
Introduction and objectives: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Methods: A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4657 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR were identified from 2013 to 2020. FFR was indicated in patients with no prior evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50%-70%) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to whether antiplatelet therapy was initiated after the index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during a 5-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding.
Results: After propensity score matching, there were 1634 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group and 1634 in the nonantiplatelet therapy group. The risk of MACCE was similar between the 2 groups (24.8% vs 24.7%; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.84-1.13; P = 0.745). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in the antiplatelet therapy group than in the nonantiplatelet therapy group (2.2% vs 1.2%; aHR, 2.07; 95%CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were similar in subgroup analyses.
Conclusions: In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR, antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding without reducing the risk of future ischemic events.