用脚思考:通过动觉方法提高系统发育树学习的可及性。

Q1 Social Sciences
Evolution: Education and Outreach Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y
Telma G Laurentino, Meike Scheller, Gillian Glover, Michael J Proulx, Alexandra A de Sousa
{"title":"用脚思考:通过动觉方法提高系统发育树学习的可及性。","authors":"Telma G Laurentino, Meike Scheller, Gillian Glover, Michael J Proulx, Alexandra A de Sousa","doi":"10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phylogenetics is one of the main methodologies to understand cross-cutting principles of evolution, such as common ancestry and speciation. Phylogenetic trees, however, are reportedly challenging to teach and learn. Furthermore, phylogenetics teaching methods traditionally rely solely on visual information, creating inaccessibility for people with visual impairment. Sensory learning style models advocate for tailoring teaching to individual preferred sensory learning style. However, recent research suggests that optimal learning, independently of preferred learning style, depends on the types of transmitted information and learning tasks. The lack of empirically-supported education into the effectiveness of teaching phylogenetics through alternative sensory modalities potentially hinders learning. The aim of this study was to determine whether phylogenetic trees could be better understood if presented in kinaesthetic or multisensory teaching modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 52) self-assessed personal learning style and were randomly assigned to: visual, kinaesthetic or multisensory learning conditions. Phylogeny reading performance was better for both kinaesthetic and multisensory teaching conditions, compared to the visual teaching condition. There was no main effect and no interaction effect of personal learning style.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes a baseline for further research by suggesting that easy-to-implement kinaesthetic teaching modalities might support phylogenetic tree learning and reading. This has practical implications for evolution education and accessibility for students with visual impairment, underscoring the need to shift from vision-centric teaching paradigms towards evidence-based instructional strategies that accommodate sensory diversity.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":36959,"journal":{"name":"Evolution: Education and Outreach","volume":"17 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thinking on your feet: potentially enhancing phylogenetic tree learning accessibility through a kinaesthetic approach.\",\"authors\":\"Telma G Laurentino, Meike Scheller, Gillian Glover, Michael J Proulx, Alexandra A de Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phylogenetics is one of the main methodologies to understand cross-cutting principles of evolution, such as common ancestry and speciation. Phylogenetic trees, however, are reportedly challenging to teach and learn. Furthermore, phylogenetics teaching methods traditionally rely solely on visual information, creating inaccessibility for people with visual impairment. Sensory learning style models advocate for tailoring teaching to individual preferred sensory learning style. However, recent research suggests that optimal learning, independently of preferred learning style, depends on the types of transmitted information and learning tasks. The lack of empirically-supported education into the effectiveness of teaching phylogenetics through alternative sensory modalities potentially hinders learning. The aim of this study was to determine whether phylogenetic trees could be better understood if presented in kinaesthetic or multisensory teaching modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 52) self-assessed personal learning style and were randomly assigned to: visual, kinaesthetic or multisensory learning conditions. Phylogeny reading performance was better for both kinaesthetic and multisensory teaching conditions, compared to the visual teaching condition. There was no main effect and no interaction effect of personal learning style.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes a baseline for further research by suggesting that easy-to-implement kinaesthetic teaching modalities might support phylogenetic tree learning and reading. This has practical implications for evolution education and accessibility for students with visual impairment, underscoring the need to shift from vision-centric teaching paradigms towards evidence-based instructional strategies that accommodate sensory diversity.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution: Education and Outreach\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution: Education and Outreach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution: Education and Outreach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:系统发生学是理解共同祖先和物种等进化交叉原理的主要方法之一。然而,据报道,系统发生树的教学和学习具有挑战性。此外,系统发育学的教学方法传统上只依赖视觉信息,导致视觉障碍者无法学习。感官学习风格模式主张根据个人偏好的感官学习风格进行教学。然而,最近的研究表明,最佳的学习方式与偏好的学习方式无关,取决于传递信息的类型和学习任务。通过其他感官模式进行系统发生学教学的有效性缺乏经验支持,这可能会阻碍学习。本研究的目的是确定如果以动觉或多感官教学模式呈现系统发育树,是否能更好地理解系统发育树:参与者(N = 52)对个人学习风格进行了自我评估,并被随机分配到视觉、动觉或多感官学习条件下。与视觉教学条件相比,动觉和多感官教学条件下的系统发育阅读成绩更好。个人学习风格没有主效应,也没有交互效应:本研究表明,易于实施的动觉教学模式可能有助于系统发育树的学习和阅读,从而为进一步的研究奠定了基础。这对进化教育和视力障碍学生的无障碍学习具有实际意义,强调了从以视觉为中心的教学范式转向以证据为基础的教学策略以适应感官多样性的必要性:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thinking on your feet: potentially enhancing phylogenetic tree learning accessibility through a kinaesthetic approach.

Background: Phylogenetics is one of the main methodologies to understand cross-cutting principles of evolution, such as common ancestry and speciation. Phylogenetic trees, however, are reportedly challenging to teach and learn. Furthermore, phylogenetics teaching methods traditionally rely solely on visual information, creating inaccessibility for people with visual impairment. Sensory learning style models advocate for tailoring teaching to individual preferred sensory learning style. However, recent research suggests that optimal learning, independently of preferred learning style, depends on the types of transmitted information and learning tasks. The lack of empirically-supported education into the effectiveness of teaching phylogenetics through alternative sensory modalities potentially hinders learning. The aim of this study was to determine whether phylogenetic trees could be better understood if presented in kinaesthetic or multisensory teaching modalities.

Results: Participants (N = 52) self-assessed personal learning style and were randomly assigned to: visual, kinaesthetic or multisensory learning conditions. Phylogeny reading performance was better for both kinaesthetic and multisensory teaching conditions, compared to the visual teaching condition. There was no main effect and no interaction effect of personal learning style.

Conclusions: This study establishes a baseline for further research by suggesting that easy-to-implement kinaesthetic teaching modalities might support phylogenetic tree learning and reading. This has practical implications for evolution education and accessibility for students with visual impairment, underscoring the need to shift from vision-centric teaching paradigms towards evidence-based instructional strategies that accommodate sensory diversity.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution: Education and Outreach
Evolution: Education and Outreach Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信