与传统 AVR 相比,快速部署 AVR 后会出现传导障碍。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Markus Schlömicher, Katrin Prümmer, Peter Haldenwang, Vadim Moustafine, Dinah Berres, Matthias Bechtel, Justus T Strauch
{"title":"与传统 AVR 相比,快速部署 AVR 后会出现传导障碍。","authors":"Markus Schlömicher, Katrin Prümmer, Peter Haldenwang, Vadim Moustafine, Dinah Berres, Matthias Bechtel, Justus T Strauch","doi":"10.1055/a-2464-2727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives We evaluated and compared incidence and evolution of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disorders following rapid deployment AVR and conventional AVR. Methods 147 patients who underwent isolated rapid deployment AVR between 2017 and 2021 as well as 128 patients after conventional biological AVR in the same period were included in this study. ECGs recorded at baseline, discharge and 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Results Patients in both groups had comparable a STS score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.2 p=0.32) and comparable baseline characteristics. At discharge the mean QRS width in the RDAVR group was significantly increased with 117.4  28.6 ms and a mean  QRS width of 21.7  26.3 ms (p<0.001) compared to baseline. No significant changes of QRS width were found in the AVR group with a mean value of 101.2  24.1 ms and a mean  QRS width of 3.9  23.9 ms at discharge (p=0.193). Left bundle branch block was increased in the RDAVR group after 12 months (19.3% vs 5.1% p<0.001) Permanent pacemaker implantation rates were significantly higher in the RDAVR group after 12months. (HR: 4.68; 95% CI: 2.23 - 7.43 p<0.001) Mortality did not differ in both groups after 12 months (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.83; p = 0.835) Conclusions Patients after RDAVR showed significant higher rates of left bundle branch block with significantly increased QRS width and permanent pacemaker implantation after 12 months. However, higher mortality was not observed in the RDAVR group.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conduction disorders after rapid deployment AVR compared to conventional AVR.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Schlömicher, Katrin Prümmer, Peter Haldenwang, Vadim Moustafine, Dinah Berres, Matthias Bechtel, Justus T Strauch\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2464-2727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives We evaluated and compared incidence and evolution of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disorders following rapid deployment AVR and conventional AVR. Methods 147 patients who underwent isolated rapid deployment AVR between 2017 and 2021 as well as 128 patients after conventional biological AVR in the same period were included in this study. ECGs recorded at baseline, discharge and 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Results Patients in both groups had comparable a STS score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.2 p=0.32) and comparable baseline characteristics. At discharge the mean QRS width in the RDAVR group was significantly increased with 117.4  28.6 ms and a mean  QRS width of 21.7  26.3 ms (p<0.001) compared to baseline. No significant changes of QRS width were found in the AVR group with a mean value of 101.2  24.1 ms and a mean  QRS width of 3.9  23.9 ms at discharge (p=0.193). Left bundle branch block was increased in the RDAVR group after 12 months (19.3% vs 5.1% p<0.001) Permanent pacemaker implantation rates were significantly higher in the RDAVR group after 12months. (HR: 4.68; 95% CI: 2.23 - 7.43 p<0.001) Mortality did not differ in both groups after 12 months (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.83; p = 0.835) Conclusions Patients after RDAVR showed significant higher rates of left bundle branch block with significantly increased QRS width and permanent pacemaker implantation after 12 months. However, higher mortality was not observed in the RDAVR group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2464-2727\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2464-2727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 我们评估并比较了快速部署 AVR 和传统 AVR 后房室和室内传导障碍的发生率和演变情况。方法 本研究纳入了 2017 年至 2021 年期间接受孤立快速部署房室重建术的 147 例患者,以及同期接受传统生物房室重建术的 128 例患者。对基线、出院和 12 个月时记录的心电图进行回顾性分析。结果 两组患者的 STS 评分相当(2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.2 p=0.32),基线特征相当。出院时,RDAVR 组的平均 QRS 宽度显著增加,为 117.4  28.6 ms,而  组的平均 QRS 宽度为 21.7  26.3 ms(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conduction disorders after rapid deployment AVR compared to conventional AVR.

Objectives We evaluated and compared incidence and evolution of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disorders following rapid deployment AVR and conventional AVR. Methods 147 patients who underwent isolated rapid deployment AVR between 2017 and 2021 as well as 128 patients after conventional biological AVR in the same period were included in this study. ECGs recorded at baseline, discharge and 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Results Patients in both groups had comparable a STS score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.2 p=0.32) and comparable baseline characteristics. At discharge the mean QRS width in the RDAVR group was significantly increased with 117.4  28.6 ms and a mean  QRS width of 21.7  26.3 ms (p<0.001) compared to baseline. No significant changes of QRS width were found in the AVR group with a mean value of 101.2  24.1 ms and a mean  QRS width of 3.9  23.9 ms at discharge (p=0.193). Left bundle branch block was increased in the RDAVR group after 12 months (19.3% vs 5.1% p<0.001) Permanent pacemaker implantation rates were significantly higher in the RDAVR group after 12months. (HR: 4.68; 95% CI: 2.23 - 7.43 p<0.001) Mortality did not differ in both groups after 12 months (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.83; p = 0.835) Conclusions Patients after RDAVR showed significant higher rates of left bundle branch block with significantly increased QRS width and permanent pacemaker implantation after 12 months. However, higher mortality was not observed in the RDAVR group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信