为预防艾滋病毒而开具接触前预防处方:对澳大利亚全科医生的横断面调查。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexual health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1071/SH24018
Jason Wu, Christopher K Fairley, Daniel Grace, Benjamin R Bavinton, Doug Fraser, Curtis Chan, Eric P F Chow, Jason J Ong
{"title":"为预防艾滋病毒而开具接触前预防处方:对澳大利亚全科医生的横断面调查。","authors":"Jason Wu, Christopher K Fairley, Daniel Grace, Benjamin R Bavinton, Doug Fraser, Curtis Chan, Eric P F Chow, Jason J Ong","doi":"10.1071/SH24018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective medication for preventing HIV acquisition. We examined Australian general practitioners' (GP) knowledge of PrEP efficacy, characteristics associated with ever prescribing PrEP and barriers to prescribing. Methods We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of GPs working in Australia between April and October 2022. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with: (1) the belief that PrEP was at least 80% efficacious; and (2) ever prescribed PrEP. We asked participants to rate the extent to which barriers affected their prescribing of PrEP. Results A total of 407 participants with a median age of 38years (interquartile range 33-44) were included in the study. Half of the participants (50%, 205/407) identified how to correctly take PrEP, 63% (258/407) had ever prescribed PrEP and 45% (184/407) felt confident with prescribing PrEP. Ever prescribing PrEP was associated with younger age (AOR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99), extra training in sexual health (AOR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.54-4.29) and being a S100 Prescriber (OR 2.95, 95% CI: 1.47-5.90). The main barriers to prescribing PrEP included: 'Difficulty identifying clients who require PrEP/relying on clients to ask for PrEP' (76%, 310/407), 'Lack of knowledge about PrEP' (70%, 286/407) and 'Lack of time' (69%, 281/407). Conclusion Less than half of our GP respondents were confident in prescribing PrEP, and most had difficulty identifying who would require PrEP. Specific training on PrEP, which focuses on PrEP knowledge, identifying suitable clients and making it time efficient, is recommended, with GPs being remunerated for their time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"21 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Wu, Christopher K Fairley, Daniel Grace, Benjamin R Bavinton, Doug Fraser, Curtis Chan, Eric P F Chow, Jason J Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/SH24018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective medication for preventing HIV acquisition. We examined Australian general practitioners' (GP) knowledge of PrEP efficacy, characteristics associated with ever prescribing PrEP and barriers to prescribing. Methods We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of GPs working in Australia between April and October 2022. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with: (1) the belief that PrEP was at least 80% efficacious; and (2) ever prescribed PrEP. We asked participants to rate the extent to which barriers affected their prescribing of PrEP. Results A total of 407 participants with a median age of 38years (interquartile range 33-44) were included in the study. Half of the participants (50%, 205/407) identified how to correctly take PrEP, 63% (258/407) had ever prescribed PrEP and 45% (184/407) felt confident with prescribing PrEP. Ever prescribing PrEP was associated with younger age (AOR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99), extra training in sexual health (AOR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.54-4.29) and being a S100 Prescriber (OR 2.95, 95% CI: 1.47-5.90). The main barriers to prescribing PrEP included: 'Difficulty identifying clients who require PrEP/relying on clients to ask for PrEP' (76%, 310/407), 'Lack of knowledge about PrEP' (70%, 286/407) and 'Lack of time' (69%, 281/407). Conclusion Less than half of our GP respondents were confident in prescribing PrEP, and most had difficulty identifying who would require PrEP. Specific training on PrEP, which focuses on PrEP knowledge, identifying suitable clients and making it time efficient, is recommended, with GPs being remunerated for their time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual health\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH24018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH24018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景接触前预防(PrEP)是一种安全有效的预防艾滋病感染的药物。我们研究了澳大利亚全科医生(GP)对PrEP疗效的了解、与曾经开具PrEP处方相关的特征以及开具处方的障碍。方法 我们在 2022 年 4 月至 10 月期间对在澳大利亚工作的全科医生进行了一次在线横断面调查。我们进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与以下因素相关的因素:(1) 是否认为 PrEP 至少有 80% 的疗效;以及 (2) 是否曾开具过 PrEP 处方。我们要求参与者对影响他们开具 PrEP 处方的障碍程度进行评分。结果 共有 407 名参与者参与了研究,中位年龄为 38 岁(四分位数间距为 33-44 岁)。半数参与者(50%,205/407)知道如何正确服用 PrEP,63%(258/407)曾处方过 PrEP,45%(184/407)对处方 PrEP 有信心。曾经开具过 PrEP 处方与年龄较小(AOR 0.97,95% CI:0.94-0.99)、接受过额外的性健康培训(AOR 2.57,95% CI:1.54-4.29)以及是 S100 处方人员(OR 2.95,95% CI:1.47-5.90)有关。开具 PrEP 处方的主要障碍包括难以确定需要 PrEP 的客户/依赖客户要求 PrEP"(76%,310/407)、"缺乏 PrEP 相关知识"(70%,286/407)和 "缺乏时间"(69%,281/407)。结论 不到一半的全科医生受访者有信心开具 PrEP 处方,大多数人难以确定哪些人需要 PrEP。建议对全科医生进行 PrEP 方面的专门培训,重点是 PrEP 知识、识别合适的客户以及提高培训的时间效率,并对全科医生的时间进行补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in Australia.

Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective medication for preventing HIV acquisition. We examined Australian general practitioners' (GP) knowledge of PrEP efficacy, characteristics associated with ever prescribing PrEP and barriers to prescribing. Methods We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of GPs working in Australia between April and October 2022. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with: (1) the belief that PrEP was at least 80% efficacious; and (2) ever prescribed PrEP. We asked participants to rate the extent to which barriers affected their prescribing of PrEP. Results A total of 407 participants with a median age of 38years (interquartile range 33-44) were included in the study. Half of the participants (50%, 205/407) identified how to correctly take PrEP, 63% (258/407) had ever prescribed PrEP and 45% (184/407) felt confident with prescribing PrEP. Ever prescribing PrEP was associated with younger age (AOR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99), extra training in sexual health (AOR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.54-4.29) and being a S100 Prescriber (OR 2.95, 95% CI: 1.47-5.90). The main barriers to prescribing PrEP included: 'Difficulty identifying clients who require PrEP/relying on clients to ask for PrEP' (76%, 310/407), 'Lack of knowledge about PrEP' (70%, 286/407) and 'Lack of time' (69%, 281/407). Conclusion Less than half of our GP respondents were confident in prescribing PrEP, and most had difficulty identifying who would require PrEP. Specific training on PrEP, which focuses on PrEP knowledge, identifying suitable clients and making it time efficient, is recommended, with GPs being remunerated for their time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信