体育锻炼和久坐行为对老年人执行功能的综合影响:一项横断面研究

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S486089
Hung-Yu Chen, Chen-Sin Hung, Ting-Ting Wu, Fei-Fei Ren, Yu-Kai Chang, Feng-Tzu Chen
{"title":"体育锻炼和久坐行为对老年人执行功能的综合影响:一项横断面研究","authors":"Hung-Yu Chen, Chen-Sin Hung, Ting-Ting Wu, Fei-Fei Ren, Yu-Kai Chang, Feng-Tzu Chen","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S486089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interplay between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) significantly influences cognitive health in older adults, with executive functions (EFs) being particularly vulnerable to lifestyle factors. However, previous research on older adults focused mainly on PA and is limited due to the lack of comprehensive consideration of other factors that influence EFs. Current guidelines suggest an association between sedentary behavior (SB) and EFs, yet few studies have examined the combined effects of PA and SB on EFs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationship between PA, SB, and EFs in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 116 healthy older adults aged ≥65 years were recruited and categorized into four groups based on activity lifestyles: higher PA and higher SB (PHSH); higher PA and lower SB (PHSL); lower PA and higher SB (PLSH); and lower PA and lower SB (PLSL). EFs were assessed using the Tower of London (TOL) task and the Stroop test, which measure high-order EFs (planning and problem-solving) and core EFs (inhibitory control), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PHSL group performed better on the TOL task, with lower total move scores and shorter total problem-solving times, compared to the PLSH group. The total move score of the PLSL group was better, and the total problem-solving time of the PHSH group was shorter than those of the PLSH group. However, the Stroop test scores did not differ between the four groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that increasing PA or reducing SB selectively enhances executive functions, particularly in planning and problem-solving, while less impacting inhibitory control in older adults. This highlights the importance of considering the nuanced effects of PA and SB on different aspects of executing functioning in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"17 ","pages":"3851-3861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Combined Impact of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior on Executive Functions in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hung-Yu Chen, Chen-Sin Hung, Ting-Ting Wu, Fei-Fei Ren, Yu-Kai Chang, Feng-Tzu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PRBM.S486089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interplay between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) significantly influences cognitive health in older adults, with executive functions (EFs) being particularly vulnerable to lifestyle factors. However, previous research on older adults focused mainly on PA and is limited due to the lack of comprehensive consideration of other factors that influence EFs. Current guidelines suggest an association between sedentary behavior (SB) and EFs, yet few studies have examined the combined effects of PA and SB on EFs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationship between PA, SB, and EFs in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 116 healthy older adults aged ≥65 years were recruited and categorized into four groups based on activity lifestyles: higher PA and higher SB (PHSH); higher PA and lower SB (PHSL); lower PA and higher SB (PLSH); and lower PA and lower SB (PLSL). EFs were assessed using the Tower of London (TOL) task and the Stroop test, which measure high-order EFs (planning and problem-solving) and core EFs (inhibitory control), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PHSL group performed better on the TOL task, with lower total move scores and shorter total problem-solving times, compared to the PLSH group. The total move score of the PLSL group was better, and the total problem-solving time of the PHSH group was shorter than those of the PLSH group. However, the Stroop test scores did not differ between the four groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that increasing PA or reducing SB selectively enhances executive functions, particularly in planning and problem-solving, while less impacting inhibitory control in older adults. This highlights the importance of considering the nuanced effects of PA and SB on different aspects of executing functioning in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3851-3861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S486089\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S486089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体力活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)之间的相互作用对老年人的认知健康有重大影响,其中执行功能(EFs)尤其容易受到生活方式因素的影响。然而,以往对老年人的研究主要集中在体力活动方面,由于缺乏对影响执行功能的其他因素的综合考虑,因此研究成果有限。目前的指导方针表明,久坐行为(SB)与EFs之间存在关联,但很少有研究探讨PA和SB对EFs的综合影响:本横断面研究旨在探讨老年人的体力活动、久坐行为和EFs之间的关系:共招募了 116 名年龄≥65 岁的健康老年人,并根据活动生活方式分为四组:较高 PA 和较高 SB(PHSH);较高 PA 和较低 SB(PHSL);较低 PA 和较高 SB(PLSH);较低 PA 和较低 SB(PLSL)。采用伦敦塔(TOL)任务和 Stroop 测试对 EFs 进行评估,这两项测试分别测量高阶 EFs(计划和解决问题)和核心 EFs(抑制控制):与 PLSH 组相比,PHSL 组在 TOL 任务中表现更好,移动总分更低,解决问题总时间更短。与 PLSH 组相比,PHSL 组的移动总分更高,解决问题总时间更短。然而,四组之间的 Stroop 测试得分并无差异:这些研究结果表明,增加 PA 或减少 SB 可选择性地增强老年人的执行功能,尤其是在计划和解决问题方面,而对抑制控制的影响较小。这凸显了考虑PA和SB对老年人执行功能不同方面的细微影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Combined Impact of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior on Executive Functions in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: The interplay between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) significantly influences cognitive health in older adults, with executive functions (EFs) being particularly vulnerable to lifestyle factors. However, previous research on older adults focused mainly on PA and is limited due to the lack of comprehensive consideration of other factors that influence EFs. Current guidelines suggest an association between sedentary behavior (SB) and EFs, yet few studies have examined the combined effects of PA and SB on EFs.

Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationship between PA, SB, and EFs in older adults.

Methods: A total of 116 healthy older adults aged ≥65 years were recruited and categorized into four groups based on activity lifestyles: higher PA and higher SB (PHSH); higher PA and lower SB (PHSL); lower PA and higher SB (PLSH); and lower PA and lower SB (PLSL). EFs were assessed using the Tower of London (TOL) task and the Stroop test, which measure high-order EFs (planning and problem-solving) and core EFs (inhibitory control), respectively.

Results: The PHSL group performed better on the TOL task, with lower total move scores and shorter total problem-solving times, compared to the PLSH group. The total move score of the PLSL group was better, and the total problem-solving time of the PHSH group was shorter than those of the PLSH group. However, the Stroop test scores did not differ between the four groups.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that increasing PA or reducing SB selectively enhances executive functions, particularly in planning and problem-solving, while less impacting inhibitory control in older adults. This highlights the importance of considering the nuanced effects of PA and SB on different aspects of executing functioning in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信