Yubo Guo, Lu Lin, Shihai Zhao, Gan Sun, Yuyan Chen, Ke Xue, Yuxin Yang, Shuo Chen, Yan Zhang, Guobin Li, Yanjie Zhu, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Yining Wang
{"title":"3-T 与 5-T 心肌晚期钆增强 MRI 的心肌纤维化评估:早期结果。","authors":"Yubo Guo, Lu Lin, Shihai Zhao, Gan Sun, Yuyan Chen, Ke Xue, Yuxin Yang, Shuo Chen, Yan Zhang, Guobin Li, Yanjie Zhu, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Yining Wang","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Cardiac MRI at 5 T has recently become available and potentially improves tissue contrast enhancement at gadolinium chelate-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of 5-T myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI in assessing myocardial fibrosis by comparing image quality and LGE quantification with reference-standard 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with confirmed myocardial fibrosis on previous 3-T MRI scans between January 2023 and July 2023 prospectively underwent follow-up imaging from August 2023 to November 2023. Each participant underwent follow-up 5-T imaging using an identical dose of contrast agent. Radiologist scoring of image quality using a Likert scale (range, 1-5), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio, and semiautomatic quantitative LGE assessment were obtained and reported as medians and IQRs. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare characteristics derived at 3-T and 5-T imaging. Results A total of 18 participants (mean age, 49 years ± 17 [SD]; nine male participants) were included, with a mean interval of 6.2 months ± 2.3 between undergoing 3-T and 5-T MRI. Median image quality scores were 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.2) at 3 T and 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.4) at 5 T (<i>P</i> = .45). SNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T (183.7 [IQR, 147.2-255.9] vs 125.8 [IQR, 108.2-171.6], respectively; <i>P</i> = .002). Median CNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T in normal myocardium (50.8 [IQR, 35.4-67.9] vs 16.5 [IQR, 11.3-24.6], respectively) and pericardial fat (21.4 [IQR, 7.1-29.3] vs -5.0 [IQR, -16.4 to -2.3], respectively) (both <i>P</i> < .001). There was no evidence of a difference in the percentage of LGE quantified between 5 T and 3 T (median, 11.8% [IQR, 7.7%-20.5%] vs 12.6% [IQR, 6.6%-20.4%], respectively; <i>P</i> = .81). Conclusion Myocardial LGE MRI at 5 T was found to be feasible, with no evidence of differences in subjective image quality and myocardial fibrosis quantification compared with 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Furthermore, with use of identical contrast agent doses, SNRs and CNRs were improved at 5 T. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Czum in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"313 2","pages":"e233424"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myocardial Fibrosis Assessment at 3-T versus 5-T Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI: Early Results.\",\"authors\":\"Yubo Guo, Lu Lin, Shihai Zhao, Gan Sun, Yuyan Chen, Ke Xue, Yuxin Yang, Shuo Chen, Yan Zhang, Guobin Li, Yanjie Zhu, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Yining Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/radiol.233424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Cardiac MRI at 5 T has recently become available and potentially improves tissue contrast enhancement at gadolinium chelate-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of 5-T myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI in assessing myocardial fibrosis by comparing image quality and LGE quantification with reference-standard 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with confirmed myocardial fibrosis on previous 3-T MRI scans between January 2023 and July 2023 prospectively underwent follow-up imaging from August 2023 to November 2023. Each participant underwent follow-up 5-T imaging using an identical dose of contrast agent. Radiologist scoring of image quality using a Likert scale (range, 1-5), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio, and semiautomatic quantitative LGE assessment were obtained and reported as medians and IQRs. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare characteristics derived at 3-T and 5-T imaging. Results A total of 18 participants (mean age, 49 years ± 17 [SD]; nine male participants) were included, with a mean interval of 6.2 months ± 2.3 between undergoing 3-T and 5-T MRI. Median image quality scores were 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.2) at 3 T and 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.4) at 5 T (<i>P</i> = .45). SNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T (183.7 [IQR, 147.2-255.9] vs 125.8 [IQR, 108.2-171.6], respectively; <i>P</i> = .002). Median CNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T in normal myocardium (50.8 [IQR, 35.4-67.9] vs 16.5 [IQR, 11.3-24.6], respectively) and pericardial fat (21.4 [IQR, 7.1-29.3] vs -5.0 [IQR, -16.4 to -2.3], respectively) (both <i>P</i> < .001). There was no evidence of a difference in the percentage of LGE quantified between 5 T and 3 T (median, 11.8% [IQR, 7.7%-20.5%] vs 12.6% [IQR, 6.6%-20.4%], respectively; <i>P</i> = .81). Conclusion Myocardial LGE MRI at 5 T was found to be feasible, with no evidence of differences in subjective image quality and myocardial fibrosis quantification compared with 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Furthermore, with use of identical contrast agent doses, SNRs and CNRs were improved at 5 T. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Czum in this issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology\",\"volume\":\"313 2\",\"pages\":\"e233424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233424\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233424","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 5 T 的心脏磁共振成像技术最近已经问世,并有可能改善钆螯合物增强 T1 加权成像的组织对比度增强。目的 通过比较图像质量和 LGE 定量与参考标准的 3 T 心肌 LGE MRI,评估 5 T 心肌晚期钆增强 (LGE) MRI 在评估心肌纤维化方面的可行性。材料与方法 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间,既往 3-T MRI 扫描确诊心肌纤维化的连续患者在 2023 年 8 月至 2023 年 11 月期间接受了前瞻性随访成像。每位患者都使用相同剂量的造影剂接受了后续 5-T 成像检查。放射科医师使用李克特量表(范围 1-5)、信噪比(SNR)、对比度-噪声比(CNR)、对比度和半自动定量 LGE 评估对图像质量进行评分,并以中位数和 IQRs 的形式进行报告。使用配对 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较 3-T 和 5-T 成像的特征。结果 共纳入 18 名参与者(平均年龄 49 岁 ± 17 [SD];9 名男性参与者),接受 3-T 和 5-T 磁共振成像的平均间隔时间为 6.2 个月(± 2.3)。图像质量评分中位数在 3 T 时为 4.0(IQR,3.0-4.2),在 5 T 时为 4.0(IQR,3.0-4.4)(P = .45)。5 T 的 SNR 高于 3 T(分别为 183.7 [IQR, 147.2-255.9] vs 125.8 [IQR, 108.2-171.6];P = .002)。正常心肌(分别为 50.8 [IQR, 35.4-67.9] vs 16.5 [IQR, 11.3-24.6])和心包脂肪(分别为 21.4 [IQR, 7.1-29.3] vs -5.0 [IQR, -16.4 to -2.3])的 5 T 中位 CNR 高于 3 T(P 均 < .001)。没有证据表明 5 T 和 3 T 量化的 LGE 百分比存在差异(中位数分别为 11.8% [IQR, 7.7%-20.5%] vs 12.6% [IQR, 6.6%-20.4%]; P = .81)。结论 5 T 心肌 LGE MRI 是可行的,与 3 T 心肌 LGE MRI 相比,在主观图像质量和心肌纤维化定量方面没有证据表明存在差异。此外,在使用相同造影剂剂量的情况下,5 T 的信噪比和有线信噪比都有所提高。本文有补充材料。另请参阅本期 Czum 的社论。
Myocardial Fibrosis Assessment at 3-T versus 5-T Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI: Early Results.
Background Cardiac MRI at 5 T has recently become available and potentially improves tissue contrast enhancement at gadolinium chelate-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of 5-T myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI in assessing myocardial fibrosis by comparing image quality and LGE quantification with reference-standard 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with confirmed myocardial fibrosis on previous 3-T MRI scans between January 2023 and July 2023 prospectively underwent follow-up imaging from August 2023 to November 2023. Each participant underwent follow-up 5-T imaging using an identical dose of contrast agent. Radiologist scoring of image quality using a Likert scale (range, 1-5), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio, and semiautomatic quantitative LGE assessment were obtained and reported as medians and IQRs. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare characteristics derived at 3-T and 5-T imaging. Results A total of 18 participants (mean age, 49 years ± 17 [SD]; nine male participants) were included, with a mean interval of 6.2 months ± 2.3 between undergoing 3-T and 5-T MRI. Median image quality scores were 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.2) at 3 T and 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.4) at 5 T (P = .45). SNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T (183.7 [IQR, 147.2-255.9] vs 125.8 [IQR, 108.2-171.6], respectively; P = .002). Median CNR at 5 T was higher than at 3 T in normal myocardium (50.8 [IQR, 35.4-67.9] vs 16.5 [IQR, 11.3-24.6], respectively) and pericardial fat (21.4 [IQR, 7.1-29.3] vs -5.0 [IQR, -16.4 to -2.3], respectively) (both P < .001). There was no evidence of a difference in the percentage of LGE quantified between 5 T and 3 T (median, 11.8% [IQR, 7.7%-20.5%] vs 12.6% [IQR, 6.6%-20.4%], respectively; P = .81). Conclusion Myocardial LGE MRI at 5 T was found to be feasible, with no evidence of differences in subjective image quality and myocardial fibrosis quantification compared with 3-T myocardial LGE MRI. Furthermore, with use of identical contrast agent doses, SNRs and CNRs were improved at 5 T. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Czum in this issue.
期刊介绍:
Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies.
Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.