补充螺旋藻对成人血压的影响:经过 GRADE 评估的随机临床试验系统综述与元分析》(A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials)。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Hamidreza Shiri, Javad Yasbolaghi Sharahi, Maryam Alizadeh Sani, Seyyed Mohammad Javad Mousavi, Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi, Ali Akbar Soleimani, Jamal Amri, Ghodratollah Panahi
{"title":"补充螺旋藻对成人血压的影响:经过 GRADE 评估的随机临床试验系统综述与元分析》(A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials)。","authors":"Hamidreza Shiri, Javad Yasbolaghi Sharahi, Maryam Alizadeh Sani, Seyyed Mohammad Javad Mousavi, Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi, Ali Akbar Soleimani, Jamal Amri, Ghodratollah Panahi","doi":"10.1002/ptr.8377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have yielded controversial results regarding the effect of spirulina on blood pressure (BP), which need updating. So, this updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) carry out a more accurate estimation of the effect of spirulina on BP in adults. This systematic searches (in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science) until April 1, 2024, to identify related RCTs based on PICOS guidelines (population (individuals > 18 years old), the intervention (spirulina), the comparison (control or placebo group), the outcomes (systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP)), the study design (RCTs)), and PRISMA-checklist (Supporting Information, data S2). We evaluated the impact of spirulina on DBP and SBP. Conventional procedures were employed for analyzing publication bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity. The GRADE criteria and the Cochrane assessment method were employed to evaluate the risk of bias (ROB) and certainty of evidence across the studies, respectively. The result shows spirulina consumption decreases SBP (WMD: -4.41 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.74 to -2.07, I<sup>2</sup> = 66.1%) and DBP (WMD: -2.84 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.65 to -1.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 62.3%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated SBP and DBP were still lower in individuals with ≥ 120 and ≥ 80 mmHg, hypertension (HTN) individuals, overweight individuals, age > 50 years, and > 8 weeks of intervention. Indeed, we do not observe publication bias, ROB, or interference studies in the overall results of BPs, and based on GRADE, our outcomes have moderate quality. Because of the low number of studies and participants, the dose-response and meta-regression are not significant. His study demonstrated spirulina intervention decreased SBP and DBP in HTN and overweight individuals, age > 50 years, and > 8 weeks of intervention. So, spirulina intake decreases BP and could be used in clinical practice. Furthermore, more and high-quality RCTs are needed to establish the clinical efficacy of the spirulina and determine cutoff spirulina interventions based on dose and duration. Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024534608.</p>","PeriodicalId":20110,"journal":{"name":"Phytotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Spirulina Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Adults: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Shiri, Javad Yasbolaghi Sharahi, Maryam Alizadeh Sani, Seyyed Mohammad Javad Mousavi, Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi, Ali Akbar Soleimani, Jamal Amri, Ghodratollah Panahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ptr.8377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous studies have yielded controversial results regarding the effect of spirulina on blood pressure (BP), which need updating. So, this updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) carry out a more accurate estimation of the effect of spirulina on BP in adults. This systematic searches (in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science) until April 1, 2024, to identify related RCTs based on PICOS guidelines (population (individuals > 18 years old), the intervention (spirulina), the comparison (control or placebo group), the outcomes (systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP)), the study design (RCTs)), and PRISMA-checklist (Supporting Information, data S2). We evaluated the impact of spirulina on DBP and SBP. Conventional procedures were employed for analyzing publication bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity. The GRADE criteria and the Cochrane assessment method were employed to evaluate the risk of bias (ROB) and certainty of evidence across the studies, respectively. The result shows spirulina consumption decreases SBP (WMD: -4.41 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.74 to -2.07, I<sup>2</sup> = 66.1%) and DBP (WMD: -2.84 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.65 to -1.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 62.3%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated SBP and DBP were still lower in individuals with ≥ 120 and ≥ 80 mmHg, hypertension (HTN) individuals, overweight individuals, age > 50 years, and > 8 weeks of intervention. Indeed, we do not observe publication bias, ROB, or interference studies in the overall results of BPs, and based on GRADE, our outcomes have moderate quality. Because of the low number of studies and participants, the dose-response and meta-regression are not significant. His study demonstrated spirulina intervention decreased SBP and DBP in HTN and overweight individuals, age > 50 years, and > 8 weeks of intervention. So, spirulina intake decreases BP and could be used in clinical practice. Furthermore, more and high-quality RCTs are needed to establish the clinical efficacy of the spirulina and determine cutoff spirulina interventions based on dose and duration. Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024534608.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phytotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phytotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.8377\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.8377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究对螺旋藻对血压(BP)的影响结果存在争议,需要更新。因此,本研究对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了更新的系统综述和荟萃分析,以更准确地估计螺旋藻对成人血压的影响。本次系统性检索(PubMed/Medline、Scopus 和 ISI Web of Science)的时间截止到 2024 年 4 月 1 日,根据 PICOS 指南(人群(18 岁以上的个体)、干预(螺旋藻)、对比(对照组或安慰剂组)、结果(收缩压 (SBP) 和舒张压 (DBP))、研究设计(RCTs))和 PRISMA 检查表(佐证资料,数据 S2)确定了相关的 RCTs。我们评估了螺旋藻对 DBP 和 SBP 的影响。我们采用了常规程序分析发表偏倚、异质性和敏感性。采用 GRADE 标准和 Cochrane 评估方法分别评估了各研究的偏倚风险(ROB)和证据确定性。结果显示,食用螺旋藻可降低 SBP(WMD:-4.41 mmHg,95% CI:-6.74 至 -2.07,I2 = 66.1%)和 DBP(WMD:-2.84 mmHg,95% CI:-4.65 至 -1.03,I2 = 62.3%)。亚组分析表明,SBP 和 DBP ≥ 120 mmHg 和 ≥ 80 mmHg、高血压(HTN)患者、超重患者、年龄大于 50 岁以及干预时间大于 8 周者的血压仍然较低。事实上,在血压的总体结果中,我们没有观察到发表偏倚、ROB 或干扰研究,根据 GRADE,我们的结果具有中等质量。由于研究和参与人数较少,剂量反应和元回归的结果并不显著。他的研究表明,螺旋藻干预可降低高血压和超重人群的 SBP 和 DBP,年龄大于 50 岁,干预时间大于 8 周。因此,螺旋藻能降低血压,可用于临床实践。此外,还需要更多高质量的 RCT 来确定螺旋藻的临床疗效,并根据剂量和持续时间确定螺旋藻干预的临界值。试验注册:PROCO:CRD42024534608。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Spirulina Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Adults: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Previous studies have yielded controversial results regarding the effect of spirulina on blood pressure (BP), which need updating. So, this updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) carry out a more accurate estimation of the effect of spirulina on BP in adults. This systematic searches (in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science) until April 1, 2024, to identify related RCTs based on PICOS guidelines (population (individuals > 18 years old), the intervention (spirulina), the comparison (control or placebo group), the outcomes (systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP)), the study design (RCTs)), and PRISMA-checklist (Supporting Information, data S2). We evaluated the impact of spirulina on DBP and SBP. Conventional procedures were employed for analyzing publication bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity. The GRADE criteria and the Cochrane assessment method were employed to evaluate the risk of bias (ROB) and certainty of evidence across the studies, respectively. The result shows spirulina consumption decreases SBP (WMD: -4.41 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.74 to -2.07, I2 = 66.1%) and DBP (WMD: -2.84 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.65 to -1.03, I2 = 62.3%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated SBP and DBP were still lower in individuals with ≥ 120 and ≥ 80 mmHg, hypertension (HTN) individuals, overweight individuals, age > 50 years, and > 8 weeks of intervention. Indeed, we do not observe publication bias, ROB, or interference studies in the overall results of BPs, and based on GRADE, our outcomes have moderate quality. Because of the low number of studies and participants, the dose-response and meta-regression are not significant. His study demonstrated spirulina intervention decreased SBP and DBP in HTN and overweight individuals, age > 50 years, and > 8 weeks of intervention. So, spirulina intake decreases BP and could be used in clinical practice. Furthermore, more and high-quality RCTs are needed to establish the clinical efficacy of the spirulina and determine cutoff spirulina interventions based on dose and duration. Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024534608.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phytotherapy Research
Phytotherapy Research 医学-药学
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
325
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Phytotherapy Research is an internationally recognized pharmacological journal that serves as a trailblazing resource for biochemists, pharmacologists, and toxicologists. We strive to disseminate groundbreaking research on medicinal plants, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and understanding in this field. Our primary focus areas encompass pharmacology, toxicology, and the clinical applications of herbs and natural products in medicine. We actively encourage submissions on the effects of commonly consumed food ingredients and standardized plant extracts. We welcome a range of contributions including original research papers, review articles, and letters. By providing a platform for the latest developments and discoveries in phytotherapy, we aim to support the advancement of scientific knowledge and contribute to the improvement of modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信