Maria Frantzi, Ana C Morillo, Guillermo Lendinez, Ana Blanca, Daniel Lopez Ruiz, Jose Parada, Isabel Heidegger, Zoran Culig, Emmanouil Mavrogeorgis, Antonio Lopez Beltran, Marina Mora-Ortiz, Julia Carrasco-Valiente, Harald Mischak, Rafael A Medina, Pablo Campos Hernandez, Enrique Gómez Gómez
{"title":"验证基于尿液的蛋白质组学检验,预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌:补充 mpMRI 途径。","authors":"Maria Frantzi, Ana C Morillo, Guillermo Lendinez, Ana Blanca, Daniel Lopez Ruiz, Jose Parada, Isabel Heidegger, Zoran Culig, Emmanouil Mavrogeorgis, Antonio Lopez Beltran, Marina Mora-Ortiz, Julia Carrasco-Valiente, Harald Mischak, Rafael A Medina, Pablo Campos Hernandez, Enrique Gómez Gómez","doi":"10.1159/000542465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>INTRODUCTIONː Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men. A major clinical need is to accurately predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa). A proteomics-based 19-biomarker model (19-BM) was previously developed using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) and validated in 1000 patients at risk for PCa. This study aimed to validate 19-BM in a multicenter prospective cohort of 101 biopsy-naive patients using current diagnostic pathways. METHODSː Urine samples from 101 patients with PCa were analyzed using CE-MS. All patients underwent MRI using a 3-T system. The 19-BM score was estimated using support vector machine-based software (MosaCluster v1.7.0), employing a previously established cut-off criterion of -0.07. Previously developed diagnostic nomograms were calculated along with MRI. RESULTSː Independent validation of 19-BM yielded a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 85% (AUC:0.81). This performance surpassed those of PSA (AUC:0.56) and PSA density (AUC:0.69). For PI-RADS≤ 3 patients, 19-BM showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 88%. Integrating 19-BM with MRI resulted in significantly better accuracy (AUC:0.90) compared to individual investigations alone (AUC19BM=0.81; p=0.004 and AUCMRI:0.79; p=0.001). Examining the decision curve analysis, 19-BM with MRI surpassed other approaches for the prevailing risk interval from a 30% cut-off. CONCLUSIONSː 19-BM exhibited favorable reproducibility for the prediction of csPCa. In patients with PI-RADS≤3, 19-BM correctly classified 88% of the patients with insignificant PCa at the cost of one missed csPCa patient. Utilizing the 19-BM test could prove valuable in complementing MRI and reducing the need for unnecessary biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19805,"journal":{"name":"Pathobiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a urine- based proteomics test to predict clinically significant prostate cancer: complementing mpMRI pathway.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Frantzi, Ana C Morillo, Guillermo Lendinez, Ana Blanca, Daniel Lopez Ruiz, Jose Parada, Isabel Heidegger, Zoran Culig, Emmanouil Mavrogeorgis, Antonio Lopez Beltran, Marina Mora-Ortiz, Julia Carrasco-Valiente, Harald Mischak, Rafael A Medina, Pablo Campos Hernandez, Enrique Gómez Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>INTRODUCTIONː Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men. A major clinical need is to accurately predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa). A proteomics-based 19-biomarker model (19-BM) was previously developed using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) and validated in 1000 patients at risk for PCa. This study aimed to validate 19-BM in a multicenter prospective cohort of 101 biopsy-naive patients using current diagnostic pathways. METHODSː Urine samples from 101 patients with PCa were analyzed using CE-MS. All patients underwent MRI using a 3-T system. The 19-BM score was estimated using support vector machine-based software (MosaCluster v1.7.0), employing a previously established cut-off criterion of -0.07. Previously developed diagnostic nomograms were calculated along with MRI. RESULTSː Independent validation of 19-BM yielded a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 85% (AUC:0.81). This performance surpassed those of PSA (AUC:0.56) and PSA density (AUC:0.69). For PI-RADS≤ 3 patients, 19-BM showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 88%. Integrating 19-BM with MRI resulted in significantly better accuracy (AUC:0.90) compared to individual investigations alone (AUC19BM=0.81; p=0.004 and AUCMRI:0.79; p=0.001). Examining the decision curve analysis, 19-BM with MRI surpassed other approaches for the prevailing risk interval from a 30% cut-off. CONCLUSIONSː 19-BM exhibited favorable reproducibility for the prediction of csPCa. In patients with PI-RADS≤3, 19-BM correctly classified 88% of the patients with insignificant PCa at the cost of one missed csPCa patient. Utilizing the 19-BM test could prove valuable in complementing MRI and reducing the need for unnecessary biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542465\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a urine- based proteomics test to predict clinically significant prostate cancer: complementing mpMRI pathway.
INTRODUCTIONː Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men. A major clinical need is to accurately predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa). A proteomics-based 19-biomarker model (19-BM) was previously developed using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) and validated in 1000 patients at risk for PCa. This study aimed to validate 19-BM in a multicenter prospective cohort of 101 biopsy-naive patients using current diagnostic pathways. METHODSː Urine samples from 101 patients with PCa were analyzed using CE-MS. All patients underwent MRI using a 3-T system. The 19-BM score was estimated using support vector machine-based software (MosaCluster v1.7.0), employing a previously established cut-off criterion of -0.07. Previously developed diagnostic nomograms were calculated along with MRI. RESULTSː Independent validation of 19-BM yielded a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 85% (AUC:0.81). This performance surpassed those of PSA (AUC:0.56) and PSA density (AUC:0.69). For PI-RADS≤ 3 patients, 19-BM showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 88%. Integrating 19-BM with MRI resulted in significantly better accuracy (AUC:0.90) compared to individual investigations alone (AUC19BM=0.81; p=0.004 and AUCMRI:0.79; p=0.001). Examining the decision curve analysis, 19-BM with MRI surpassed other approaches for the prevailing risk interval from a 30% cut-off. CONCLUSIONSː 19-BM exhibited favorable reproducibility for the prediction of csPCa. In patients with PI-RADS≤3, 19-BM correctly classified 88% of the patients with insignificant PCa at the cost of one missed csPCa patient. Utilizing the 19-BM test could prove valuable in complementing MRI and reducing the need for unnecessary biopsies.
期刊介绍:
''Pathobiology'' offers a valuable platform for the publication of high-quality original research into the mechanisms underlying human disease. Aiming to serve as a bridge between basic biomedical research and clinical medicine, the journal welcomes articles from scientific areas such as pathology, oncology, anatomy, virology, internal medicine, surgery, cell and molecular biology, and immunology. Published bimonthly, ''Pathobiology'' features original research papers and reviews on translational research. The journal offers the possibility to publish proceedings of meetings dedicated to one particular topic.