Samuel Feldman, Jesse Basra, Anjola Lawani, Yunyi Ren, Machelle Wilson, Ala Moshiri, Susanna S Park, Glenn Yiu
{"title":"阈下微脉冲激光治疗视力良好的中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿患者:随机临床试验 \"PULSE 研究\"。","authors":"Samuel Feldman, Jesse Basra, Anjola Lawani, Yunyi Ren, Machelle Wilson, Ala Moshiri, Susanna S Park, Glenn Yiu","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20240924-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To determine if sub-threshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy can prevent or delay vision loss in diabetic macular edema (DME) with good visual acuity (VA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Prospective, single-masked, sham-controlled trial in 27 eyes of 19 adult patients with treatment-naïve, center-involved DME, and VA of 20/25 or better. Measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), average threshold on microperimetry, and central subfield thickness (CST). The primary outcome measure was median time to vision loss of 10 letters at any visit or 5 to 9 letters at two consecutive visits ≤ 28 days apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight eyes met vision loss criteria during the 2-year study, with similar proportions for SML (<i>n</i> = 5) and sham (<i>n</i> = 3). Median time to vision loss was 5 months for both groups. At 6 months, there were no statistical differences in BCVA, LLVA, CS, microperimetry threshold, and CST between SML and sham arms (<i>P</i> > 0.05 in all measures).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In eyes with center-involved DME and good VA, SML did not prevent or delay the vision loss threshold for initiating anti-VEGF therapy. However, these results may be affected by a high rate of early participant dropout from the study. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:XX-XX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Eyes With Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema With Good Visual Acuity: The PULSE Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Feldman, Jesse Basra, Anjola Lawani, Yunyi Ren, Machelle Wilson, Ala Moshiri, Susanna S Park, Glenn Yiu\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/23258160-20240924-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To determine if sub-threshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy can prevent or delay vision loss in diabetic macular edema (DME) with good visual acuity (VA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Prospective, single-masked, sham-controlled trial in 27 eyes of 19 adult patients with treatment-naïve, center-involved DME, and VA of 20/25 or better. Measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), average threshold on microperimetry, and central subfield thickness (CST). The primary outcome measure was median time to vision loss of 10 letters at any visit or 5 to 9 letters at two consecutive visits ≤ 28 days apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight eyes met vision loss criteria during the 2-year study, with similar proportions for SML (<i>n</i> = 5) and sham (<i>n</i> = 3). Median time to vision loss was 5 months for both groups. At 6 months, there were no statistical differences in BCVA, LLVA, CS, microperimetry threshold, and CST between SML and sham arms (<i>P</i> > 0.05 in all measures).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In eyes with center-involved DME and good VA, SML did not prevent or delay the vision loss threshold for initiating anti-VEGF therapy. However, these results may be affected by a high rate of early participant dropout from the study. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:XX-XX.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240924-03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240924-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Eyes With Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema With Good Visual Acuity: The PULSE Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Background and objective: To determine if sub-threshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy can prevent or delay vision loss in diabetic macular edema (DME) with good visual acuity (VA).
Patients and methods: Prospective, single-masked, sham-controlled trial in 27 eyes of 19 adult patients with treatment-naïve, center-involved DME, and VA of 20/25 or better. Measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), average threshold on microperimetry, and central subfield thickness (CST). The primary outcome measure was median time to vision loss of 10 letters at any visit or 5 to 9 letters at two consecutive visits ≤ 28 days apart.
Results: Eight eyes met vision loss criteria during the 2-year study, with similar proportions for SML (n = 5) and sham (n = 3). Median time to vision loss was 5 months for both groups. At 6 months, there were no statistical differences in BCVA, LLVA, CS, microperimetry threshold, and CST between SML and sham arms (P > 0.05 in all measures).
Conclusion: In eyes with center-involved DME and good VA, SML did not prevent or delay the vision loss threshold for initiating anti-VEGF therapy. However, these results may be affected by a high rate of early participant dropout from the study. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].
期刊介绍:
OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.