Cho-Han Chiang, Xiaocao Xu, Ahmed Shahid, Junmin Song, Kuan-Yu Chi, Yu-Cheng Chang, Yu Chang, Cho-Hung Chiang, Shuwen Lin
{"title":"接受 pembrolizumab 治疗的乳腺癌患者的体重指数与死亡率之间的关系。","authors":"Cho-Han Chiang, Xiaocao Xu, Ahmed Shahid, Junmin Song, Kuan-Yu Chi, Yu-Cheng Chang, Yu Chang, Cho-Hung Chiang, Shuwen Lin","doi":"10.1159/000542542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A higher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with a better response and overall survival in patients with lung cancer or melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Pembrolizumab has been approved for the use of breast cancer but its relationship with survival outcomes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX Analytics Network database, which contains de-identified data from over 120 participating healthcare institutions. We included all adult female patients with breast cancer who received pembrolizumab. We excluded patients who were prescribed endocrine or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeted therapies. We compared the 1-year all-cause mortality between patients who were overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and those who were normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2). We matched patients on predetermined variables including age, race, breast cancer-directed therapy, cardiovascular and diabetes medications, and underlying comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1628 eligible patients, of whom 1163 had a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 465 had a BMI < 25 kg/m2. After propensity score matching, 410 patients in each cohort were well-balanced for demographics, breast cancer-directed therapy, and underlying comorbidities. The mean ages for patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2 were 56.7±14.0 and 56.9±15.0, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 1 year, 28 and 53 patients died in the BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2 cohorts, respectively. Patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 had a 49% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (Hazard ratio (HR), 0.51 [95% CI: 0.33-0.81]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was associated with a lower all-cause mortality among breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between body mass index and mortality in breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab.\",\"authors\":\"Cho-Han Chiang, Xiaocao Xu, Ahmed Shahid, Junmin Song, Kuan-Yu Chi, Yu-Cheng Chang, Yu Chang, Cho-Hung Chiang, Shuwen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A higher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with a better response and overall survival in patients with lung cancer or melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Pembrolizumab has been approved for the use of breast cancer but its relationship with survival outcomes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX Analytics Network database, which contains de-identified data from over 120 participating healthcare institutions. We included all adult female patients with breast cancer who received pembrolizumab. We excluded patients who were prescribed endocrine or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeted therapies. We compared the 1-year all-cause mortality between patients who were overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and those who were normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2). We matched patients on predetermined variables including age, race, breast cancer-directed therapy, cardiovascular and diabetes medications, and underlying comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1628 eligible patients, of whom 1163 had a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 465 had a BMI < 25 kg/m2. After propensity score matching, 410 patients in each cohort were well-balanced for demographics, breast cancer-directed therapy, and underlying comorbidities. The mean ages for patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2 were 56.7±14.0 and 56.9±15.0, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 1 year, 28 and 53 patients died in the BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2 cohorts, respectively. Patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 had a 49% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (Hazard ratio (HR), 0.51 [95% CI: 0.33-0.81]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was associated with a lower all-cause mortality among breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542542\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The association between body mass index and mortality in breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab.
Introduction: A higher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with a better response and overall survival in patients with lung cancer or melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Pembrolizumab has been approved for the use of breast cancer but its relationship with survival outcomes is unclear.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX Analytics Network database, which contains de-identified data from over 120 participating healthcare institutions. We included all adult female patients with breast cancer who received pembrolizumab. We excluded patients who were prescribed endocrine or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeted therapies. We compared the 1-year all-cause mortality between patients who were overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and those who were normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2). We matched patients on predetermined variables including age, race, breast cancer-directed therapy, cardiovascular and diabetes medications, and underlying comorbidities.
Results: We identified 1628 eligible patients, of whom 1163 had a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 465 had a BMI < 25 kg/m2. After propensity score matching, 410 patients in each cohort were well-balanced for demographics, breast cancer-directed therapy, and underlying comorbidities. The mean ages for patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2 were 56.7±14.0 and 56.9±15.0, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 1 year, 28 and 53 patients died in the BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2 cohorts, respectively. Patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 had a 49% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (Hazard ratio (HR), 0.51 [95% CI: 0.33-0.81]).
Conclusions: A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was associated with a lower all-cause mortality among breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.