对减少每日吸烟量和低吸烟率对降低烟草危害风险的有效性的误解。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emily Brennan, Tegan Nuss, Ashleigh Haynes, Michelle Scollo, Wendy R Winnall, Melanie Wakefield, Sarah Durkin
{"title":"对减少每日吸烟量和低吸烟率对降低烟草危害风险的有效性的误解。","authors":"Emily Brennan, Tegan Nuss, Ashleigh Haynes, Michelle Scollo, Wendy R Winnall, Melanie Wakefield, Sarah Durkin","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reducing the amount smoked per day, or smoking at a low rate, confers limited protection from smoking harms. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of misperceptions about cutting down and low-rate smoking among Australian adults who smoke.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional online survey in April/May 2022 (N=2,740). Participants were asked whether they agreed (misperception) or disagreed that \"Reducing the number of cigarettes smoked per day is an effective way to reduce the risk of experiencing the health harms of smoking\". They were also asked whether the statement \"Smoking 1 cigarette per day is about 1/20th as dangerous as smoking a pack of 20 cigarettes per day\" sounded about right (misperception) or if it was less dangerous (misperception) or more dangerous than that.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The misperception that reducing the number of cigarettes smoked is an effective way to reduce risk was held by 72.0% of people who smoke overall, but was more common among those who smoked <5 cigarettes daily (76.3%; Adj PR=1.11 [95% CI 1.01-1.21]) or only occasionally (79.7%; Adj PR=1.14 [1.06-1.23]) compared with those who smoked 5+ cigarettes daily (66.7%). Over two-thirds (67.9%) underestimated the dangers of smoking 1 cigarette per day, and this misperception was also more common among low-rate smokers (77.6%, Adj PR=1.14 [95% CI 1.04-1.26]) compared to those who smoked 5+ cigarettes daily (63.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misperceptions about the value of cutting down and low-rate smoking for reducing the risk of tobacco-caused harm are pervasive, especially among those who currently smoke at a low-rate or only occasionally.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Recent epidemiological evidence confirms that the risks of harm associated with low-rate smoking and cutting down are much higher than would be expected if the relationship between consumption and harm was linear. Findings from this study indicate that misperceptions about the benefits conferred by these smoking patterns are pervasive among people who smoke, particularly among those who currently smoke at a low rate. Corrective education that explains the mechanisms for the increased risk posed by these behaviours could be delivered via package health warnings and/or public health campaigns and may provide low-rate and occasional smokers with additional reasons to quit.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misperceptions about the effectiveness of cutting down and low-rate daily smoking for reducing the risk of tobacco-caused harm.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Brennan, Tegan Nuss, Ashleigh Haynes, Michelle Scollo, Wendy R Winnall, Melanie Wakefield, Sarah Durkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reducing the amount smoked per day, or smoking at a low rate, confers limited protection from smoking harms. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of misperceptions about cutting down and low-rate smoking among Australian adults who smoke.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional online survey in April/May 2022 (N=2,740). Participants were asked whether they agreed (misperception) or disagreed that \\\"Reducing the number of cigarettes smoked per day is an effective way to reduce the risk of experiencing the health harms of smoking\\\". They were also asked whether the statement \\\"Smoking 1 cigarette per day is about 1/20th as dangerous as smoking a pack of 20 cigarettes per day\\\" sounded about right (misperception) or if it was less dangerous (misperception) or more dangerous than that.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The misperception that reducing the number of cigarettes smoked is an effective way to reduce risk was held by 72.0% of people who smoke overall, but was more common among those who smoked <5 cigarettes daily (76.3%; Adj PR=1.11 [95% CI 1.01-1.21]) or only occasionally (79.7%; Adj PR=1.14 [1.06-1.23]) compared with those who smoked 5+ cigarettes daily (66.7%). Over two-thirds (67.9%) underestimated the dangers of smoking 1 cigarette per day, and this misperception was also more common among low-rate smokers (77.6%, Adj PR=1.14 [95% CI 1.04-1.26]) compared to those who smoked 5+ cigarettes daily (63.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misperceptions about the value of cutting down and low-rate smoking for reducing the risk of tobacco-caused harm are pervasive, especially among those who currently smoke at a low-rate or only occasionally.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Recent epidemiological evidence confirms that the risks of harm associated with low-rate smoking and cutting down are much higher than would be expected if the relationship between consumption and harm was linear. Findings from this study indicate that misperceptions about the benefits conferred by these smoking patterns are pervasive among people who smoke, particularly among those who currently smoke at a low rate. Corrective education that explains the mechanisms for the increased risk posed by these behaviours could be delivered via package health warnings and/or public health campaigns and may provide low-rate and occasional smokers with additional reasons to quit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae263\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:减少每日吸烟量或吸烟率较低,对吸烟危害的保护作用有限:减少每天吸烟量或低吸烟率能有限地避免吸烟危害。我们的目的是量化澳大利亚成年吸烟者对减少吸烟量和低吸烟率的误解的普遍程度:方法:2022 年 4 月/5 月的横断面在线调查(N=2740)。参与者被问及是否同意(误解)或不同意 "减少每天吸烟数量是降低吸烟危害健康风险的有效方法"。他们还被问到,"每天吸 1 支烟的危害大约是每天吸一包 20 支烟危害的 1/20 "这句话是否听起来差不多(误解),或者它的危害比这句话更小(误解)或更大:72.0%的吸烟者认为减少吸烟数量是降低风险的有效方法,但在吸烟者中这一误解更为普遍:关于减少吸烟量和低吸烟率对降低烟草危害风险的价值的误解很普遍,尤其是在目前低吸烟率或偶尔吸烟的人群中:最近的流行病学证据证实,与低吸烟率和减量吸烟相关的危害风险远高于消费与危害之间线性关系的预期。这项研究的结果表明,在吸烟人群中,尤其是在目前吸烟率较低的人群中,普遍存在着对这些吸烟方式所带来的益处的误解。可以通过包装上的健康警示和/或公共卫生运动开展纠正教育,解释这些行为增加风险的机制,这可能会为低吸烟率和偶尔吸烟者提供更多戒烟的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misperceptions about the effectiveness of cutting down and low-rate daily smoking for reducing the risk of tobacco-caused harm.

Introduction: Reducing the amount smoked per day, or smoking at a low rate, confers limited protection from smoking harms. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of misperceptions about cutting down and low-rate smoking among Australian adults who smoke.

Method: Cross-sectional online survey in April/May 2022 (N=2,740). Participants were asked whether they agreed (misperception) or disagreed that "Reducing the number of cigarettes smoked per day is an effective way to reduce the risk of experiencing the health harms of smoking". They were also asked whether the statement "Smoking 1 cigarette per day is about 1/20th as dangerous as smoking a pack of 20 cigarettes per day" sounded about right (misperception) or if it was less dangerous (misperception) or more dangerous than that.

Results: The misperception that reducing the number of cigarettes smoked is an effective way to reduce risk was held by 72.0% of people who smoke overall, but was more common among those who smoked <5 cigarettes daily (76.3%; Adj PR=1.11 [95% CI 1.01-1.21]) or only occasionally (79.7%; Adj PR=1.14 [1.06-1.23]) compared with those who smoked 5+ cigarettes daily (66.7%). Over two-thirds (67.9%) underestimated the dangers of smoking 1 cigarette per day, and this misperception was also more common among low-rate smokers (77.6%, Adj PR=1.14 [95% CI 1.04-1.26]) compared to those who smoked 5+ cigarettes daily (63.1%).

Conclusions: Misperceptions about the value of cutting down and low-rate smoking for reducing the risk of tobacco-caused harm are pervasive, especially among those who currently smoke at a low-rate or only occasionally.

Implications: Recent epidemiological evidence confirms that the risks of harm associated with low-rate smoking and cutting down are much higher than would be expected if the relationship between consumption and harm was linear. Findings from this study indicate that misperceptions about the benefits conferred by these smoking patterns are pervasive among people who smoke, particularly among those who currently smoke at a low rate. Corrective education that explains the mechanisms for the increased risk posed by these behaviours could be delivered via package health warnings and/or public health campaigns and may provide low-rate and occasional smokers with additional reasons to quit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信