了解全球公众对 mRNA 疫苗和疗法的看法。

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Jiaxiang Xu, Zhengdong Wu, Lily Wass, Heidi J Larson, Leesa Lin
{"title":"了解全球公众对 mRNA 疫苗和疗法的看法。","authors":"Jiaxiang Xu, Zhengdong Wu, Lily Wass, Heidi J Larson, Leesa Lin","doi":"10.1038/s41541-024-01019-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development and rollout of mRNA vaccines during COVID-19 marked a significant advancement in vaccinology, yet public hesitation to vaccination was prevalent, indicating the potential risk that future mRNA-based medical innovations will fail to be adopted. Utilizing a combined approach of large language models with manual validation and unsupervised machine learning, we conducted a social listening analysis to assess attitudes towards mRNA vaccines and therapeutics on Twitter from June 2022 to May 2023, contrasting online perspectives with data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Our findings reveal widespread negative sentiment and a global lack of confidence in the safety, effectiveness, and trustworthiness of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics, with frequent discussions of severe vaccine side effects, rumors, and misinformation. This underscores the need for targeted communication strategies to foster acceptance of medical treatments and strengthen public trust in order to enhance societal resilience to future health challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"9 1","pages":"218"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping global public perspectives on mRNA vaccines and therapeutics.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxiang Xu, Zhengdong Wu, Lily Wass, Heidi J Larson, Leesa Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41541-024-01019-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The development and rollout of mRNA vaccines during COVID-19 marked a significant advancement in vaccinology, yet public hesitation to vaccination was prevalent, indicating the potential risk that future mRNA-based medical innovations will fail to be adopted. Utilizing a combined approach of large language models with manual validation and unsupervised machine learning, we conducted a social listening analysis to assess attitudes towards mRNA vaccines and therapeutics on Twitter from June 2022 to May 2023, contrasting online perspectives with data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Our findings reveal widespread negative sentiment and a global lack of confidence in the safety, effectiveness, and trustworthiness of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics, with frequent discussions of severe vaccine side effects, rumors, and misinformation. This underscores the need for targeted communication strategies to foster acceptance of medical treatments and strengthen public trust in order to enhance societal resilience to future health challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-01019-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-01019-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 期间 mRNA 疫苗的开发和推广标志着疫苗学的重大进步,但公众对疫苗接种普遍犹豫不决,这表明未来基于 mRNA 的医疗创新可能存在不被采用的风险。我们利用带有人工验证的大型语言模型和无监督机器学习相结合的方法,进行了社交聆听分析,以评估 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 5 月期间 Twitter 上人们对 mRNA 疫苗和疗法的态度,并将在线观点与疫苗不良事件报告系统的数据进行对比。我们的研究结果表明,全球范围内对 mRNA 疫苗和疗法的安全性、有效性和可信度普遍存在负面情绪和缺乏信心,关于疫苗严重副作用、谣言和错误信息的讨论屡见不鲜。这凸显了有必要采取有针对性的传播策略,以促进人们接受医学治疗并加强公众信任,从而提高社会应对未来健康挑战的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping global public perspectives on mRNA vaccines and therapeutics.

The development and rollout of mRNA vaccines during COVID-19 marked a significant advancement in vaccinology, yet public hesitation to vaccination was prevalent, indicating the potential risk that future mRNA-based medical innovations will fail to be adopted. Utilizing a combined approach of large language models with manual validation and unsupervised machine learning, we conducted a social listening analysis to assess attitudes towards mRNA vaccines and therapeutics on Twitter from June 2022 to May 2023, contrasting online perspectives with data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Our findings reveal widespread negative sentiment and a global lack of confidence in the safety, effectiveness, and trustworthiness of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics, with frequent discussions of severe vaccine side effects, rumors, and misinformation. This underscores the need for targeted communication strategies to foster acceptance of medical treatments and strengthen public trust in order to enhance societal resilience to future health challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信