食道闭锁的随访和过渡做法:对欧洲罕见遗传性和先天性畸形参考网络(ERNICA)中心和附属机构的回顾。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Natalie Durkin, Marco Pellegrini, Ramon Gorter, Graham Slater, Kate M K Cross, Benno Ure, Rene Wijnen, Frédéric Gottrand, Simon Eaton, Paolo De Coppi
{"title":"食道闭锁的随访和过渡做法:对欧洲罕见遗传性和先天性畸形参考网络(ERNICA)中心和附属机构的回顾。","authors":"Natalie Durkin, Marco Pellegrini, Ramon Gorter, Graham Slater, Kate M K Cross, Benno Ure, Rene Wijnen, Frédéric Gottrand, Simon Eaton, Paolo De Coppi","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05865-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand the provision and distribution of esophageal atresia (EA) follow-up (FU) and transition services across European Reference Network for rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) member and affiliate centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A REDCap questionnaire was sent to clinical leads of 18 ERNICA members and 14 affiliate centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29 of 32 centers responded (91%), the majority of which were highly specialized. Two-thirds had a dedicated EA clinic with a specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT), offered to selected/complex patients only in 40% of centers. ERNICA centers were more likely to offer an MDT FU clinic than affiliates, with lack of resources most cited as a barrier to uptake (67%). Delivery of routine investigations was heterogeneous, particularly provision of three endoscopies over the course of FU (24%). Only 55% had a dedicated transition pathway, more prevalent in ERNICA centers (81% vs. 30%; p < 0.01). Self-reported awareness of ERNICA and European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidance for FU and transition was poor (28%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the existence of European follow-up and transition guidelines, their delivery is not uniform and may be limited by lack of awareness of the guidelines and a lack of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow-up and transition practices in esophageal atresia: a review of European Reference Network on rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) centres and affiliates.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Durkin, Marco Pellegrini, Ramon Gorter, Graham Slater, Kate M K Cross, Benno Ure, Rene Wijnen, Frédéric Gottrand, Simon Eaton, Paolo De Coppi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00383-024-05865-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand the provision and distribution of esophageal atresia (EA) follow-up (FU) and transition services across European Reference Network for rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) member and affiliate centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A REDCap questionnaire was sent to clinical leads of 18 ERNICA members and 14 affiliate centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29 of 32 centers responded (91%), the majority of which were highly specialized. Two-thirds had a dedicated EA clinic with a specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT), offered to selected/complex patients only in 40% of centers. ERNICA centers were more likely to offer an MDT FU clinic than affiliates, with lack of resources most cited as a barrier to uptake (67%). Delivery of routine investigations was heterogeneous, particularly provision of three endoscopies over the course of FU (24%). Only 55% had a dedicated transition pathway, more prevalent in ERNICA centers (81% vs. 30%; p < 0.01). Self-reported awareness of ERNICA and European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidance for FU and transition was poor (28%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the existence of European follow-up and transition guidelines, their delivery is not uniform and may be limited by lack of awareness of the guidelines and a lack of resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550284/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05865-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05865-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解欧洲罕见遗传性和先天性畸形参考网络(ERNICA)成员和附属中心提供食管闭锁(EA)随访(FU)和过渡服务的情况和分布:方法:向 18 个 ERNICA 成员和 14 个附属中心的临床负责人发送了 REDCap 问卷。结果:32 个中心中有 29 个(91%)做出了回复,其中大多数都是高度专业化的中心。三分之二的中心设有EA专科门诊,并配有专业的多学科团队(MDT),只有40%的中心为选定的/复杂的患者提供EA服务。与附属机构相比,ERNICA中心更有可能提供MDT FU门诊,而资源匮乏则是阻碍其提供MDT FU门诊的主要原因(67%)。常规检查的提供情况参差不齐,尤其是在FU期间提供三次内镜检查(24%)。只有55%的中心有专门的转归途径,而在ERNICA中心则更为普遍(81%对30%;P 结论:尽管欧洲存在随访和转归途径,但在ERNICA中心的比例并不高:尽管欧洲制定了随访和转归指南,但其执行情况并不统一,而且可能因缺乏对指南的了解和资源不足而受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Follow-up and transition practices in esophageal atresia: a review of European Reference Network on rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) centres and affiliates.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand the provision and distribution of esophageal atresia (EA) follow-up (FU) and transition services across European Reference Network for rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) member and affiliate centers.

Methods: A REDCap questionnaire was sent to clinical leads of 18 ERNICA members and 14 affiliate centers.

Results: 29 of 32 centers responded (91%), the majority of which were highly specialized. Two-thirds had a dedicated EA clinic with a specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT), offered to selected/complex patients only in 40% of centers. ERNICA centers were more likely to offer an MDT FU clinic than affiliates, with lack of resources most cited as a barrier to uptake (67%). Delivery of routine investigations was heterogeneous, particularly provision of three endoscopies over the course of FU (24%). Only 55% had a dedicated transition pathway, more prevalent in ERNICA centers (81% vs. 30%; p < 0.01). Self-reported awareness of ERNICA and European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidance for FU and transition was poor (28%).

Conclusion: Despite the existence of European follow-up and transition guidelines, their delivery is not uniform and may be limited by lack of awareness of the guidelines and a lack of resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信