基于血管和基于基质的冠心病命名法之间的权衡。

IF 41.7 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Nature Reviews Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1038/s41569-024-01099-7

Robert A. Byrne, Adnan Kastrati

{"title":"基于血管和基于基质的冠心病命名法之间的权衡。","authors":"Robert A. Byrne, Adnan Kastrati","doi":"10.1038/s41569-024-01099-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debate exists regarding the best terminology for common presentations of heart diseases caused by epicardial and/or microvascular coronary artery disease with or without myocardial ischaemia. In this Comment, we discuss the pros and cons of a new proposal to replace the vessel-based nomenclature of acute and chronic coronary syndromes with the myocardial-oriented nomenclature of acute and non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes.","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":"22 2","pages":"65-66"},"PeriodicalIF":41.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade-offs between vessel-based and substrate-based nomenclatures for coronary heart diseases\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Byrne, Adnan Kastrati\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41569-024-01099-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debate exists regarding the best terminology for common presentations of heart diseases caused by epicardial and/or microvascular coronary artery disease with or without myocardial ischaemia. In this Comment, we discuss the pros and cons of a new proposal to replace the vessel-based nomenclature of acute and chronic coronary syndromes with the myocardial-oriented nomenclature of acute and non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"65-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":41.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-024-01099-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-024-01099-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于有或无心肌缺血的心外膜和/或微血管冠状动脉疾病引起的心脏病的常见表现的最佳术语存在争议。在这篇评论中，我们讨论了以心肌为导向的急性和非急性心肌缺血综合征命名法取代以血管为基础的急性和慢性冠脉综合征命名法的新建议的利弊。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Trade-offs between vessel-based and substrate-based nomenclatures for coronary heart diseases

查看原文本刊更多论文

Trade-offs between vessel-based and substrate-based nomenclatures for coronary heart diseases

Debate exists regarding the best terminology for common presentations of heart diseases caused by epicardial and/or microvascular coronary artery disease with or without myocardial ischaemia. In this Comment, we discuss the pros and cons of a new proposal to replace the vessel-based nomenclature of acute and chronic coronary syndromes with the myocardial-oriented nomenclature of acute and non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nature Reviews Cardiology 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

53.10

自引率

0.60%

发文量

143

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.