[效率研究与临床指南的一致性。改进的机会在哪里?]

Q4 Medicine
Gerjanne Vianen, Romy Zwarts-van de Putte, Mirte Brom, Teus van Barneveld
{"title":"[效率研究与临床指南的一致性。改进的机会在哪里?]","authors":"Gerjanne Vianen, Romy Zwarts-van de Putte, Mirte Brom, Teus van Barneveld","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide insight as well as challenges and opportunities to more effectively align Dutch efficiency research with clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Evaluation research METHOD: The alignment with existing clinical guidelines regarding medical specialist care was analyzed for 111 efficiency studies funded by the Dutch national health care research programme, and completed between 2018-2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety percent of the studies could be linked to a clinical guideline. A limited number (19%) were actually integrated in a guideline, whereas 22% of the studies did not (sufficiently) align with the related questions from the clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By providing insight into the processes, it becomes clear that choices must be made in various stages. The results show that the alignment of efficiency research with clinical guidelines is (still) suboptimal. Close collaboration between ZonMw, the Knowledge Institute and relevant stakeholders is therefore essential. The goal is to optimize the processes and make current, well-defined knowledge quickly and effectively available for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The alignment of efficiency studies with clinical guidelines. Where are the opportunities for improvement?]\",\"authors\":\"Gerjanne Vianen, Romy Zwarts-van de Putte, Mirte Brom, Teus van Barneveld\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide insight as well as challenges and opportunities to more effectively align Dutch efficiency research with clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Evaluation research METHOD: The alignment with existing clinical guidelines regarding medical specialist care was analyzed for 111 efficiency studies funded by the Dutch national health care research programme, and completed between 2018-2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety percent of the studies could be linked to a clinical guideline. A limited number (19%) were actually integrated in a guideline, whereas 22% of the studies did not (sufficiently) align with the related questions from the clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By providing insight into the processes, it becomes clear that choices must be made in various stages. The results show that the alignment of efficiency research with clinical guidelines is (still) suboptimal. Close collaboration between ZonMw, the Knowledge Institute and relevant stakeholders is therefore essential. The goal is to optimize the processes and make current, well-defined knowledge quickly and effectively available for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为更有效地使荷兰效率研究与临床指南保持一致提供见解以及挑战和机遇:评估研究 方法:对2018-2023年间完成的、由荷兰国家医疗保健研究计划资助的111项效率研究与现有医疗专家护理临床指南的一致性进行分析:90%的研究可与临床指南相联系。少数研究(19%)实际纳入了指南,而22%的研究与临床指南中的相关问题不(充分)一致:通过对过程的深入了解,我们清楚地认识到必须在不同阶段做出选择。结果表明,效率研究与临床指南的一致性(仍然)不够理想。因此,ZonMw、知识研究所和相关利益方之间的密切合作至关重要。我们的目标是优化流程,为临床实践快速有效地提供最新的、定义明确的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The alignment of efficiency studies with clinical guidelines. Where are the opportunities for improvement?]

Objective: To provide insight as well as challenges and opportunities to more effectively align Dutch efficiency research with clinical guidelines.

Design: Evaluation research METHOD: The alignment with existing clinical guidelines regarding medical specialist care was analyzed for 111 efficiency studies funded by the Dutch national health care research programme, and completed between 2018-2023.

Results: Ninety percent of the studies could be linked to a clinical guideline. A limited number (19%) were actually integrated in a guideline, whereas 22% of the studies did not (sufficiently) align with the related questions from the clinical guidelines.

Conclusion: By providing insight into the processes, it becomes clear that choices must be made in various stages. The results show that the alignment of efficiency research with clinical guidelines is (still) suboptimal. Close collaboration between ZonMw, the Knowledge Institute and relevant stakeholders is therefore essential. The goal is to optimize the processes and make current, well-defined knowledge quickly and effectively available for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信