[骨折预防:打破准则?]

Q4 Medicine
Thomas Merlijn, Petra J M Elders, Henriëtte E van der Horst
{"title":"[骨折预防:打破准则?]","authors":"Thomas Merlijn, Petra J M Elders, Henriëtte E van der Horst","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have evaluated the merits and scientific underpinning of two different forms of fracture prevention. The first is the fracture liaison service(FLS), in which persons aged 50 years or older who have suffered a fracture are assessed and treated. The second is a stepped screening program for women aged 65 years or older, utilizing questionnaires and bone densitometry to identify those with the highest fracture risk for treatment. The FLS approach is based on indirect evidence and has not been studied in randomised studies. There is a lack of evidence for effectiveness in the younger age group of 50-65 years. A meta-analysis of three randomised studies in older women showed a 20% risk reduction of hip fractures. We suggest that FLS should focus on the group >65 years and that an additional once in a life time fracture risk screening program in women of 75-80 year should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Fracture prevention: breaking with the guideline?]\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Merlijn, Petra J M Elders, Henriëtte E van der Horst\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have evaluated the merits and scientific underpinning of two different forms of fracture prevention. The first is the fracture liaison service(FLS), in which persons aged 50 years or older who have suffered a fracture are assessed and treated. The second is a stepped screening program for women aged 65 years or older, utilizing questionnaires and bone densitometry to identify those with the highest fracture risk for treatment. The FLS approach is based on indirect evidence and has not been studied in randomised studies. There is a lack of evidence for effectiveness in the younger age group of 50-65 years. A meta-analysis of three randomised studies in older women showed a 20% risk reduction of hip fractures. We suggest that FLS should focus on the group >65 years and that an additional once in a life time fracture risk screening program in women of 75-80 year should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对两种不同形式的骨折预防措施的优点和科学依据进行了评估。第一种是骨折联络服务(FLS),对 50 岁或以上的骨折患者进行评估和治疗。第二种是针对 65 岁或以上妇女的阶梯式筛查计划,利用问卷调查和骨密度测量来确定哪些人骨折风险最高,以便进行治疗。FLS 方法以间接证据为基础,尚未经过随机研究。对于 50-65 岁的年轻群体,缺乏有效的证据。对三项针对老年妇女的随机研究进行的荟萃分析表明,髋部骨折的风险降低了 20%。我们建议,FLS 应重点关注年龄大于 65 岁的人群,并应考虑在 75-80 岁的女性中增加终身一次的骨折风险筛查计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Fracture prevention: breaking with the guideline?]

We have evaluated the merits and scientific underpinning of two different forms of fracture prevention. The first is the fracture liaison service(FLS), in which persons aged 50 years or older who have suffered a fracture are assessed and treated. The second is a stepped screening program for women aged 65 years or older, utilizing questionnaires and bone densitometry to identify those with the highest fracture risk for treatment. The FLS approach is based on indirect evidence and has not been studied in randomised studies. There is a lack of evidence for effectiveness in the younger age group of 50-65 years. A meta-analysis of three randomised studies in older women showed a 20% risk reduction of hip fractures. We suggest that FLS should focus on the group >65 years and that an additional once in a life time fracture risk screening program in women of 75-80 year should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信