用模型拟合加权最小二乘法替代主成分分析法分析能量色散 X 射线光谱图谱。

IF 2.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David Wahlqvist, Martin Ek
{"title":"用模型拟合加权最小二乘法替代主成分分析法分析能量色散 X 射线光谱图谱。","authors":"David Wahlqvist, Martin Ek","doi":"10.1093/mam/ozae106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spectrum imaging with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) has become ubiquitous in material characterization using electron microscopy. Multivariate statistical methods, commonly principal component analysis (PCA), are often used to aid analysis of the resulting multidimensional datasets; PCA can provide denoising prior to further analysis or grouping of pixels into distinct phases with similar signals. However, it is well known that PCA can introduce artifacts at low signal-to-noise ratios. Unfortunately, when evaluating the benefits and risks with PCA, it is often compared only against raw data, where it tends to shine; alternative data analysis methods providing a fair point of comparison are often lacking. Here, we directly compare PCA with a strategy based on (the conceptually and computationally simpler) weighted least squares (WLS). We show that for four representative cases, model fitting of the sum spectrum followed by WLS (mfWLS) consistently outperforms PCA in terms of finding and accurately describing compositional gradients and inclusions and as a preprocessing step to clustering. Additionally, we demonstrate that some common artifacts and biases displayed by PCA are avoided with the mfWLS approach. In summary, mfWLS can provide a superior option to PCA for analysis of EDS spectrum images as the signal is simply and accurately modeled.</p>","PeriodicalId":18625,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-Fitting Weighted Least Squares as an Alternative to Principal Component Analysis for Analyzing Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Spectrum Images.\",\"authors\":\"David Wahlqvist, Martin Ek\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mam/ozae106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spectrum imaging with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) has become ubiquitous in material characterization using electron microscopy. Multivariate statistical methods, commonly principal component analysis (PCA), are often used to aid analysis of the resulting multidimensional datasets; PCA can provide denoising prior to further analysis or grouping of pixels into distinct phases with similar signals. However, it is well known that PCA can introduce artifacts at low signal-to-noise ratios. Unfortunately, when evaluating the benefits and risks with PCA, it is often compared only against raw data, where it tends to shine; alternative data analysis methods providing a fair point of comparison are often lacking. Here, we directly compare PCA with a strategy based on (the conceptually and computationally simpler) weighted least squares (WLS). We show that for four representative cases, model fitting of the sum spectrum followed by WLS (mfWLS) consistently outperforms PCA in terms of finding and accurately describing compositional gradients and inclusions and as a preprocessing step to clustering. Additionally, we demonstrate that some common artifacts and biases displayed by PCA are avoided with the mfWLS approach. In summary, mfWLS can provide a superior option to PCA for analysis of EDS spectrum images as the signal is simply and accurately modeled.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microscopy and Microanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microscopy and Microanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozae106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozae106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用能量色散 X 射线光谱(EDS)进行光谱成像在使用电子显微镜进行材料表征时已变得无处不在。多变量统计方法,通常是主成分分析(PCA),经常被用来帮助分析由此产生的多维数据集;PCA 可以在进一步分析前进行去噪,或将像素归类为具有相似信号的不同相位。然而,众所周知,PCA 在信噪比较低的情况下会产生伪影。遗憾的是,在评估 PCA 的优势和风险时,通常只将其与原始数据进行比较,而原始数据往往是 PCA 的亮点;通常缺乏提供公平比较点的其他数据分析方法。在这里,我们将 PCA 与基于加权最小二乘法(WLS)(概念上和计算上更简单)的策略进行直接比较。我们的研究表明,对于四个具有代表性的案例,采用 WLS(mfWLS)对总谱进行模型拟合,在发现和准确描述成分梯度和夹杂物方面,以及作为聚类的预处理步骤方面,始终优于 PCA。此外,我们还证明了 mfWLS 方法可以避免 PCA 所显示的一些常见假象和偏差。总之,在分析 EDS 光谱图像时,mfWLS 可以提供比 PCA 更优越的选择,因为它可以对信号进行简单而精确的建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model-Fitting Weighted Least Squares as an Alternative to Principal Component Analysis for Analyzing Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Spectrum Images.

Spectrum imaging with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) has become ubiquitous in material characterization using electron microscopy. Multivariate statistical methods, commonly principal component analysis (PCA), are often used to aid analysis of the resulting multidimensional datasets; PCA can provide denoising prior to further analysis or grouping of pixels into distinct phases with similar signals. However, it is well known that PCA can introduce artifacts at low signal-to-noise ratios. Unfortunately, when evaluating the benefits and risks with PCA, it is often compared only against raw data, where it tends to shine; alternative data analysis methods providing a fair point of comparison are often lacking. Here, we directly compare PCA with a strategy based on (the conceptually and computationally simpler) weighted least squares (WLS). We show that for four representative cases, model fitting of the sum spectrum followed by WLS (mfWLS) consistently outperforms PCA in terms of finding and accurately describing compositional gradients and inclusions and as a preprocessing step to clustering. Additionally, we demonstrate that some common artifacts and biases displayed by PCA are avoided with the mfWLS approach. In summary, mfWLS can provide a superior option to PCA for analysis of EDS spectrum images as the signal is simply and accurately modeled.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microscopy and Microanalysis
Microscopy and Microanalysis 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1391
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy and Microanalysis publishes original research papers in the fields of microscopy, imaging, and compositional analysis. This distinguished international forum is intended for microscopists in both biology and materials science. The journal provides significant articles that describe new and existing techniques and instrumentation, as well as the applications of these to the imaging and analysis of microstructure. Microscopy and Microanalysis also includes review articles, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信