嫁接系统中植物源微生物土壤遗产的影响--好转。

IF 13.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Tingting Wang, Yang Ruan, Qicheng Xu, Qirong Shen, Ning Ling, Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse
{"title":"嫁接系统中植物源微生物土壤遗产的影响--好转。","authors":"Tingting Wang, Yang Ruan, Qicheng Xu, Qirong Shen, Ning Ling, Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse","doi":"10.1186/s40168-024-01938-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plant-soil feedback arises from microbial legacies left by plants in the soil. Grafting is a common technique used to prevent yield declines in monocultures. Yet, our understanding of how grafting alters the composition of soil microbiota and how these changes affect subsequent crop performance remains limited. Our experiment involved monoculturing ungrafted and grafted watermelons to obtain conditioned soils, followed by growing the watermelons on the conditioned soils to investigate plant-soil feedback effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ungrafted plants grew better in soil previously conditioned by a different plant (heterospecific soil) while grafted plants grew better in soil conditioned by the same plant (conspecific soil). We demonstrated experimentally that these differences in growth were linked to changes in microorganisms. Using a supervised machine learning algorithm, we showed that differences in the relative abundance of certain genera, such as Rhizobium, Chryseobacterium, Fusarium, and Aspergillus, significantly influenced the conspecific plant-soil feedback. Metabolomic analyses revealed that ungrafted plants in heterospecific soil enriched arginine biosynthesis, whereas grafted plants in conspecific soil increased sphingolipid metabolism. Elsewhere, the metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of ungrafted plants identified in heterospecific soil include Chryseobacterium and Lysobacter, microorganisms having been prominently identified in earlier research as contributors to plant growth. Metabolic reconstruction revealed the putative ability of Chryseobacterium to convert D-glucono-1,5-lactone to gluconic acid, pointing to distinct disease-suppressive mechanisms and hence distinct microbial functional legacies between grafted and ungrafted plants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show a deep impact of the soil microbial reservoir on plant growth and suggest the necessity to protect and improve this microbial community in agricultural soils. The work also suggests possibilities of optimizing microbiota-mediated benefits through grafting herein, a way that \"engineered\" soil microbial communities for better plant growth. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of plant-derived microbial soil legacy in a grafting system-a turn for the better.\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Wang, Yang Ruan, Qicheng Xu, Qirong Shen, Ning Ling, Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40168-024-01938-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plant-soil feedback arises from microbial legacies left by plants in the soil. Grafting is a common technique used to prevent yield declines in monocultures. Yet, our understanding of how grafting alters the composition of soil microbiota and how these changes affect subsequent crop performance remains limited. Our experiment involved monoculturing ungrafted and grafted watermelons to obtain conditioned soils, followed by growing the watermelons on the conditioned soils to investigate plant-soil feedback effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ungrafted plants grew better in soil previously conditioned by a different plant (heterospecific soil) while grafted plants grew better in soil conditioned by the same plant (conspecific soil). We demonstrated experimentally that these differences in growth were linked to changes in microorganisms. Using a supervised machine learning algorithm, we showed that differences in the relative abundance of certain genera, such as Rhizobium, Chryseobacterium, Fusarium, and Aspergillus, significantly influenced the conspecific plant-soil feedback. Metabolomic analyses revealed that ungrafted plants in heterospecific soil enriched arginine biosynthesis, whereas grafted plants in conspecific soil increased sphingolipid metabolism. Elsewhere, the metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of ungrafted plants identified in heterospecific soil include Chryseobacterium and Lysobacter, microorganisms having been prominently identified in earlier research as contributors to plant growth. Metabolic reconstruction revealed the putative ability of Chryseobacterium to convert D-glucono-1,5-lactone to gluconic acid, pointing to distinct disease-suppressive mechanisms and hence distinct microbial functional legacies between grafted and ungrafted plants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show a deep impact of the soil microbial reservoir on plant growth and suggest the necessity to protect and improve this microbial community in agricultural soils. The work also suggests possibilities of optimizing microbiota-mediated benefits through grafting herein, a way that \\\"engineered\\\" soil microbial communities for better plant growth. Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiome\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01938-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01938-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:植物-土壤反馈来自植物在土壤中留下的微生物遗产。嫁接是防止单一作物产量下降的常用技术。然而,我们对嫁接如何改变土壤微生物群的组成以及这些变化如何影响后续作物表现的了解仍然有限。我们的实验包括对未嫁接和已嫁接的西瓜进行单株栽培,以获得调理土壤,然后在调理土壤上种植西瓜,以研究植物与土壤的反馈效应:结果:未嫁接植株在之前由不同植株调节过的土壤(异种土壤)中生长得更好,而嫁接植株在由相同植株调节过的土壤(同种土壤)中生长得更好。我们通过实验证明,这些生长差异与微生物的变化有关。我们使用一种有监督的机器学习算法证明,某些菌属,如根瘤菌属、壳针孢菌属、镰刀菌属和曲霉菌属的相对丰度差异会显著影响同种植物-土壤反馈。代谢组分析表明,异种土壤中的未嫁接植物富集了精氨酸生物合成,而同种土壤中的嫁接植物则增加了鞘脂代谢。另外,在异种土壤中发现的未嫁接植物的元基因组(MAGs)包括金合欢杆菌(Chryseobacterium)和溶菌酶(Lysobacter),这些微生物在早期的研究中被认为是植物生长的主要贡献者。代谢重建揭示了 Chryseobacterium 将 D-葡萄糖酮-1,5-内酯转化为葡萄糖酸的推定能力,这表明嫁接植物和非嫁接植物之间存在不同的病害抑制机制,因此也存在不同的微生物功能遗产:我们的研究结果表明了土壤微生物库对植物生长的深刻影响,并表明有必要保护和改善农业土壤中的微生物群落。这项工作还提出了通过嫁接优化微生物群介导的益处的可能性,这是一种 "设计 "土壤微生物群落以改善植物生长的方式。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of plant-derived microbial soil legacy in a grafting system-a turn for the better.

Background: Plant-soil feedback arises from microbial legacies left by plants in the soil. Grafting is a common technique used to prevent yield declines in monocultures. Yet, our understanding of how grafting alters the composition of soil microbiota and how these changes affect subsequent crop performance remains limited. Our experiment involved monoculturing ungrafted and grafted watermelons to obtain conditioned soils, followed by growing the watermelons on the conditioned soils to investigate plant-soil feedback effects.

Results: Ungrafted plants grew better in soil previously conditioned by a different plant (heterospecific soil) while grafted plants grew better in soil conditioned by the same plant (conspecific soil). We demonstrated experimentally that these differences in growth were linked to changes in microorganisms. Using a supervised machine learning algorithm, we showed that differences in the relative abundance of certain genera, such as Rhizobium, Chryseobacterium, Fusarium, and Aspergillus, significantly influenced the conspecific plant-soil feedback. Metabolomic analyses revealed that ungrafted plants in heterospecific soil enriched arginine biosynthesis, whereas grafted plants in conspecific soil increased sphingolipid metabolism. Elsewhere, the metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of ungrafted plants identified in heterospecific soil include Chryseobacterium and Lysobacter, microorganisms having been prominently identified in earlier research as contributors to plant growth. Metabolic reconstruction revealed the putative ability of Chryseobacterium to convert D-glucono-1,5-lactone to gluconic acid, pointing to distinct disease-suppressive mechanisms and hence distinct microbial functional legacies between grafted and ungrafted plants.

Conclusions: Our findings show a deep impact of the soil microbial reservoir on plant growth and suggest the necessity to protect and improve this microbial community in agricultural soils. The work also suggests possibilities of optimizing microbiota-mediated benefits through grafting herein, a way that "engineered" soil microbial communities for better plant growth. Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信