An S De Vriese, Sanjeev Sethi, Fernando C Fervenza
{"title":"狼疮性肾炎:重新定义治疗目标","authors":"An S De Vriese, Sanjeev Sethi, Fernando C Fervenza","doi":"10.1016/j.kint.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The course of proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by flares of activity alternating with periods of quiescence, against a background of chronic immune dysregulation. An accurate assessment of disease activity is of unassailable importance to tailor therapy. In the present communication, we discuss the available clinical, serological and histological tools to evaluate disease activity and how they may be applied to redefine the treatment goals in LN. Traditionally, treatment response is judged by the degree of proteinuria reduction and improvement of kidney function, but this fails to differentiate ongoing inflammatory disease from chronic damage. Despite intensive research, no novel biomarker has proved useful for clinical practice, and we continue to rely on anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels (anti-dsDNA) to assess serological activity. Repeat kidney biopsies sometimes reveal persistent inflammation despite apparent clinical remission, giving credibility to the conviction that histological remission should be a treatment goal and protocol biopsies part of the decision-making process. However, the discrepancies between clinical and histological responses to therapy can be explained by persistent systemic autoimmunity with low-grade immune complex deposition or, alternatively, by delayed clearance of intrarenal inflammation once immunological remission has been achieved. Since persistent immune dysregulation is the motor of disease activity in LN, it should be the principal focus of therapy and monitoring. We propose to replace the traditional induction-remission maintenance protocol by a more dynamic and individualized approach, and aim for 3 treatment goals, concomitantly rather than sequentially: 1) Clinical remission, by attenuating renal inflammation, using microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, eGFR and complement levels as biomarkers; 2) Immunological remission, by decreasing immune complex generation, using anti-dsDNA as biomarker; 3) Preservation of kidney function, by curtailing chronic kidney damage, using eGFR slope as biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":17801,"journal":{"name":"Kidney international","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lupus Nephritis: Redefining the treatment goals.\",\"authors\":\"An S De Vriese, Sanjeev Sethi, Fernando C Fervenza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.kint.2024.10.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The course of proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by flares of activity alternating with periods of quiescence, against a background of chronic immune dysregulation. An accurate assessment of disease activity is of unassailable importance to tailor therapy. In the present communication, we discuss the available clinical, serological and histological tools to evaluate disease activity and how they may be applied to redefine the treatment goals in LN. Traditionally, treatment response is judged by the degree of proteinuria reduction and improvement of kidney function, but this fails to differentiate ongoing inflammatory disease from chronic damage. Despite intensive research, no novel biomarker has proved useful for clinical practice, and we continue to rely on anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels (anti-dsDNA) to assess serological activity. Repeat kidney biopsies sometimes reveal persistent inflammation despite apparent clinical remission, giving credibility to the conviction that histological remission should be a treatment goal and protocol biopsies part of the decision-making process. However, the discrepancies between clinical and histological responses to therapy can be explained by persistent systemic autoimmunity with low-grade immune complex deposition or, alternatively, by delayed clearance of intrarenal inflammation once immunological remission has been achieved. Since persistent immune dysregulation is the motor of disease activity in LN, it should be the principal focus of therapy and monitoring. We propose to replace the traditional induction-remission maintenance protocol by a more dynamic and individualized approach, and aim for 3 treatment goals, concomitantly rather than sequentially: 1) Clinical remission, by attenuating renal inflammation, using microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, eGFR and complement levels as biomarkers; 2) Immunological remission, by decreasing immune complex generation, using anti-dsDNA as biomarker; 3) Preservation of kidney function, by curtailing chronic kidney damage, using eGFR slope as biomarker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2024.10.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2024.10.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The course of proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by flares of activity alternating with periods of quiescence, against a background of chronic immune dysregulation. An accurate assessment of disease activity is of unassailable importance to tailor therapy. In the present communication, we discuss the available clinical, serological and histological tools to evaluate disease activity and how they may be applied to redefine the treatment goals in LN. Traditionally, treatment response is judged by the degree of proteinuria reduction and improvement of kidney function, but this fails to differentiate ongoing inflammatory disease from chronic damage. Despite intensive research, no novel biomarker has proved useful for clinical practice, and we continue to rely on anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels (anti-dsDNA) to assess serological activity. Repeat kidney biopsies sometimes reveal persistent inflammation despite apparent clinical remission, giving credibility to the conviction that histological remission should be a treatment goal and protocol biopsies part of the decision-making process. However, the discrepancies between clinical and histological responses to therapy can be explained by persistent systemic autoimmunity with low-grade immune complex deposition or, alternatively, by delayed clearance of intrarenal inflammation once immunological remission has been achieved. Since persistent immune dysregulation is the motor of disease activity in LN, it should be the principal focus of therapy and monitoring. We propose to replace the traditional induction-remission maintenance protocol by a more dynamic and individualized approach, and aim for 3 treatment goals, concomitantly rather than sequentially: 1) Clinical remission, by attenuating renal inflammation, using microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, eGFR and complement levels as biomarkers; 2) Immunological remission, by decreasing immune complex generation, using anti-dsDNA as biomarker; 3) Preservation of kidney function, by curtailing chronic kidney damage, using eGFR slope as biomarker.
期刊介绍:
Kidney International (KI), the official journal of the International Society of Nephrology, is led by Dr. Pierre Ronco (Paris, France) and stands as one of nephrology's most cited and esteemed publications worldwide.
KI provides exceptional benefits for both readers and authors, featuring highly cited original articles, focused reviews, cutting-edge imaging techniques, and lively discussions on controversial topics.
The journal is dedicated to kidney research, serving researchers, clinical investigators, and practicing nephrologists.