Peter Y Cai, Erin R McNamara, Hatim Thaker, Carlos R Estrada, Hsin-Hsiao S Wang
{"title":"与脊柱裂儿科患者低价值急诊就诊有关的临床和人口学因素。","authors":"Peter Y Cai, Erin R McNamara, Hatim Thaker, Carlos R Estrada, Hsin-Hsiao S Wang","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying factors associated with emergency visits that could be delivered at lower-cost sites may help guide population health strategies for pediatric patients with spina bifida.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Emergency department encounters (2016-2023) by patients with spina bifida (< 18-years-old) in Pediatric Health Information System were identified. Absence of clinical and imaging charges was defined as low-value emergency visit. We utilized a control population of patients (<18-years-old) with obstructive/reflux uropathy who presented for emergency department encounters (2016-2023). Mixed effects (with repeated individual measurements as random effect) logistic regression was fitted to model odds of low-value emergency visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we included 22,672 emergency visits by patients with spina bifida. 20.7% of these emergency visits were low-value versus 17.7% in controls (p<0.001). Costs related to low-value emergency visits account for 3.8% of all costs for emergency visit-related encounters in patients with spina bifida. Low-value emergency visits were associated with younger age [OR 1.05 (1.04 - 1.06) per year younger], Hispanic/Latino [OR 1.21 (1.06 - 1.39) compared to non-Hispanics], black [OR 1.35 (1.16 - 1.58) compared to white], public insurance [OR 1.14 (1.01 - 1.29) compared to private insurance], and genitourinary encounter diagnosis [OR 1.16 (1.04 - 1.30)]. Using a standard patient, we found that the odds of low-value emergency visit across hospitals ranged from 0.31 to 5.36.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Younger age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, black and other race, public insurance, and genitourinary encounter diagnosis were associated with higher odds for low-value emergency visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida. There was wide variation across hospitals that warrants further investigation to elucidate best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004329"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and demographic factors linked to low-value emergency department visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Y Cai, Erin R McNamara, Hatim Thaker, Carlos R Estrada, Hsin-Hsiao S Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying factors associated with emergency visits that could be delivered at lower-cost sites may help guide population health strategies for pediatric patients with spina bifida.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Emergency department encounters (2016-2023) by patients with spina bifida (< 18-years-old) in Pediatric Health Information System were identified. Absence of clinical and imaging charges was defined as low-value emergency visit. We utilized a control population of patients (<18-years-old) with obstructive/reflux uropathy who presented for emergency department encounters (2016-2023). Mixed effects (with repeated individual measurements as random effect) logistic regression was fitted to model odds of low-value emergency visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we included 22,672 emergency visits by patients with spina bifida. 20.7% of these emergency visits were low-value versus 17.7% in controls (p<0.001). Costs related to low-value emergency visits account for 3.8% of all costs for emergency visit-related encounters in patients with spina bifida. Low-value emergency visits were associated with younger age [OR 1.05 (1.04 - 1.06) per year younger], Hispanic/Latino [OR 1.21 (1.06 - 1.39) compared to non-Hispanics], black [OR 1.35 (1.16 - 1.58) compared to white], public insurance [OR 1.14 (1.01 - 1.29) compared to private insurance], and genitourinary encounter diagnosis [OR 1.16 (1.04 - 1.30)]. Using a standard patient, we found that the odds of low-value emergency visit across hospitals ranged from 0.31 to 5.36.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Younger age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, black and other race, public insurance, and genitourinary encounter diagnosis were associated with higher odds for low-value emergency visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida. There was wide variation across hospitals that warrants further investigation to elucidate best practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101097JU0000000000004329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004329\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical and demographic factors linked to low-value emergency department visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida.
Purpose: Identifying factors associated with emergency visits that could be delivered at lower-cost sites may help guide population health strategies for pediatric patients with spina bifida.
Materials and methods: Emergency department encounters (2016-2023) by patients with spina bifida (< 18-years-old) in Pediatric Health Information System were identified. Absence of clinical and imaging charges was defined as low-value emergency visit. We utilized a control population of patients (<18-years-old) with obstructive/reflux uropathy who presented for emergency department encounters (2016-2023). Mixed effects (with repeated individual measurements as random effect) logistic regression was fitted to model odds of low-value emergency visit.
Results: In total, we included 22,672 emergency visits by patients with spina bifida. 20.7% of these emergency visits were low-value versus 17.7% in controls (p<0.001). Costs related to low-value emergency visits account for 3.8% of all costs for emergency visit-related encounters in patients with spina bifida. Low-value emergency visits were associated with younger age [OR 1.05 (1.04 - 1.06) per year younger], Hispanic/Latino [OR 1.21 (1.06 - 1.39) compared to non-Hispanics], black [OR 1.35 (1.16 - 1.58) compared to white], public insurance [OR 1.14 (1.01 - 1.29) compared to private insurance], and genitourinary encounter diagnosis [OR 1.16 (1.04 - 1.30)]. Using a standard patient, we found that the odds of low-value emergency visit across hospitals ranged from 0.31 to 5.36.
Conclusions: Younger age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, black and other race, public insurance, and genitourinary encounter diagnosis were associated with higher odds for low-value emergency visits in pediatric patients with spina bifida. There was wide variation across hospitals that warrants further investigation to elucidate best practices.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.