粘结螺钉固位种植修复体表面的去污处理:三种不同后处理清洁技术的比较。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hasan Sarfaraz, Pooja P Netalkar, Mallika Shetty, Mohammed Zahid, Rajesh Shetty
{"title":"粘结螺钉固位种植修复体表面的去污处理:三种不同后处理清洁技术的比较。","authors":"Hasan Sarfaraz, Pooja P Netalkar, Mallika Shetty, Mohammed Zahid, Rajesh Shetty","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses may become contaminated during fabrication, leading to biological complications. Studies supporting effective cleaning methods are sparse.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in -vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 different cleaning techniques for the removal of contaminants on the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five screw-retained implant-supported prostheses were divided into 3 groups after their processing in the digital laboratory. Group VS included specimens cleaned using vapor steam, group ME using a multi-enzyme cleaner in an ultrasonic bath, and group 3UC using the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method with different solutions. The presence of contaminants was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) under ×200 and ×500 magnifications and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The ImageJ software program was used to locate and quantify the debris. Statistical tests, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn test were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3 cleaning techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences in the number of surface contaminants were observed at the implant-abutment interface in all 3 groups (P<.05) after each cleaning technique, with the highest mean difference for the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning. Elements such as carbon, oxygen, titanium, and calcium showed statistically significant differences (P<.05) compared with other elements among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All 3 cleaning techniques reduced the contaminants on the surfaces of the screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. The 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method yielded the best results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decontaminating the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant prostheses: A comparison of three different post-processing cleaning techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Sarfaraz, Pooja P Netalkar, Mallika Shetty, Mohammed Zahid, Rajesh Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses may become contaminated during fabrication, leading to biological complications. Studies supporting effective cleaning methods are sparse.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in -vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 different cleaning techniques for the removal of contaminants on the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five screw-retained implant-supported prostheses were divided into 3 groups after their processing in the digital laboratory. Group VS included specimens cleaned using vapor steam, group ME using a multi-enzyme cleaner in an ultrasonic bath, and group 3UC using the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method with different solutions. The presence of contaminants was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) under ×200 and ×500 magnifications and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The ImageJ software program was used to locate and quantify the debris. Statistical tests, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn test were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3 cleaning techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences in the number of surface contaminants were observed at the implant-abutment interface in all 3 groups (P<.05) after each cleaning technique, with the highest mean difference for the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning. Elements such as carbon, oxygen, titanium, and calcium showed statistically significant differences (P<.05) compared with other elements among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All 3 cleaning techniques reduced the contaminants on the surfaces of the screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. The 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method yielded the best results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述:粘结螺钉固位的种植义齿在制作过程中可能会受到污染,从而导致生物并发症。目的:这项体外研究的目的是比较 3 种不同清洁技术去除粘结螺钉固位种植义齿表面污染物的效果:45颗螺钉固位的种植体修复体在数字化实验室处理后被分为3组。VS 组包括使用蒸汽清洗的标本,ME 组使用超声波浴中的多酶清洗剂,3UC 组使用不同溶液的三步超声波清洗法。污染物的存在是通过 ×200 和 ×500 倍率下的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散 X 射线光谱(EDS)来确定的。使用 ImageJ 软件对碎片进行定位和量化。统计检验包括 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Dunn 检验,以评估 3 种清洁技术的有效性:结果:在所有 3 组中,种植体与基台界面的表面污染物数量在统计学上存在明显差异(PC 结论:所有 3 种清洁技术都能减少污染物的数量,但在种植体与基台界面的污染物数量上存在明显差异:所有 3 种清洁技术都能减少螺钉固位种植义齿表面的污染物。三步超声波清洗法的效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decontaminating the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant prostheses: A comparison of three different post-processing cleaning techniques.

Statement of problem: Bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses may become contaminated during fabrication, leading to biological complications. Studies supporting effective cleaning methods are sparse.

Purpose: The purpose of this in -vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 different cleaning techniques for the removal of contaminants on the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant-supported prostheses.

Material and methods: Forty-five screw-retained implant-supported prostheses were divided into 3 groups after their processing in the digital laboratory. Group VS included specimens cleaned using vapor steam, group ME using a multi-enzyme cleaner in an ultrasonic bath, and group 3UC using the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method with different solutions. The presence of contaminants was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) under ×200 and ×500 magnifications and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The ImageJ software program was used to locate and quantify the debris. Statistical tests, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn test were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3 cleaning techniques.

Results: Statistically significant differences in the number of surface contaminants were observed at the implant-abutment interface in all 3 groups (P<.05) after each cleaning technique, with the highest mean difference for the 3-step ultrasonic cleaning. Elements such as carbon, oxygen, titanium, and calcium showed statistically significant differences (P<.05) compared with other elements among the groups.

Conclusions: All 3 cleaning techniques reduced the contaminants on the surfaces of the screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. The 3-step ultrasonic cleaning method yielded the best results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信