开发基于外周血 RNA-seq 的 NETseq 组合分类器:用于接受 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT 的神经内分泌肿瘤患者的无创检测和治疗反应评估的潜在新型工具。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mahesh K Padwal, Rahul V Parghane, Avik Chakraborty, Aman Kumar Ujaoney, Narasimha Anaganti, Sandip Basu, Bhakti Basu
{"title":"开发基于外周血 RNA-seq 的 NETseq 组合分类器:用于接受 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT 的神经内分泌肿瘤患者的无创检测和治疗反应评估的潜在新型工具。","authors":"Mahesh K Padwal, Rahul V Parghane, Avik Chakraborty, Aman Kumar Ujaoney, Narasimha Anaganti, Sandip Basu, Bhakti Basu","doi":"10.1111/jne.13462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are presented with metastases due to delayed diagnosis. We aimed to identify NET-related biomarkers from peripheral blood. The development and validation of a multi-gene NETseq ensemble classifier using peripheral blood RNA-Seq is reported. RNA-Seq was performed on peripheral blood samples from 178 NET patients and 73 healthy donors. Distinguishing gene features were identified from a learning cohort (59 PRRT-naïve GEP-NET patients and 38 healthy donors). Ensemble classifier combining the output of five machine learning algorithms viz. Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBOOST), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR) were trained and independently validated in the evaluation cohort (n = 106). The response to PRRT was evaluated in the PRRT cohort (n = 46) and the PRRT response monitoring cohort (n = 16). The response to <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE PRRT was assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria. The Ensemble classifier trained on 61 gene features, distinguished NET from healthy samples with 100% accuracy in the learning cohort. In an evaluation cohort, the classifier achieved 93% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.8%-98.03%) and 91.4% specificity (95% CI: 82.1%-100%) for PRRT-naïve GEP-NETs (AUROC = 95.4%). The classifier returned >87.5% sensitivity across different tumor characteristics and outperformed serum Chromogranin A sensitivity (χ<sup>2</sup> = 21.89, p = 4.161e-6). In the PRRT cohort, RECIST 1.1 responders showed significantly lower NETseq prediction scores after <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE PRRT, in comparison to the non-responders. In an independent response monitoring cohort, paired samples (before PRRT and after 2nd or 3rd cycle of PRRT) were analyzed. The NETseq prediction score significantly decreased in partial responders (p = .002) and marginally reduced in stable disease (p = .068). The NETseq ensemble classifier identified PRRT-naïve GEP-NETs with high accuracy (≥92%) and demonstrated a potential role in early treatment response monitoring in the PRRT setting. This blood-based, non-invasive, multi-analyte molecular method could be developed as a valuable adjunct to conventional methods in the detection and treatment response assessment in NET patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroendocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"e13462"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a peripheral blood RNA-seq based NETseq ensemble classifier: A potential novel tool for non-invasive detection and treatment response assessment in neuroendocrine tumor patients receiving <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE PRRT.\",\"authors\":\"Mahesh K Padwal, Rahul V Parghane, Avik Chakraborty, Aman Kumar Ujaoney, Narasimha Anaganti, Sandip Basu, Bhakti Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jne.13462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are presented with metastases due to delayed diagnosis. We aimed to identify NET-related biomarkers from peripheral blood. The development and validation of a multi-gene NETseq ensemble classifier using peripheral blood RNA-Seq is reported. RNA-Seq was performed on peripheral blood samples from 178 NET patients and 73 healthy donors. Distinguishing gene features were identified from a learning cohort (59 PRRT-naïve GEP-NET patients and 38 healthy donors). Ensemble classifier combining the output of five machine learning algorithms viz. Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBOOST), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR) were trained and independently validated in the evaluation cohort (n = 106). The response to PRRT was evaluated in the PRRT cohort (n = 46) and the PRRT response monitoring cohort (n = 16). The response to <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE PRRT was assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria. The Ensemble classifier trained on 61 gene features, distinguished NET from healthy samples with 100% accuracy in the learning cohort. In an evaluation cohort, the classifier achieved 93% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.8%-98.03%) and 91.4% specificity (95% CI: 82.1%-100%) for PRRT-naïve GEP-NETs (AUROC = 95.4%). The classifier returned >87.5% sensitivity across different tumor characteristics and outperformed serum Chromogranin A sensitivity (χ<sup>2</sup> = 21.89, p = 4.161e-6). In the PRRT cohort, RECIST 1.1 responders showed significantly lower NETseq prediction scores after <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE PRRT, in comparison to the non-responders. In an independent response monitoring cohort, paired samples (before PRRT and after 2nd or 3rd cycle of PRRT) were analyzed. The NETseq prediction score significantly decreased in partial responders (p = .002) and marginally reduced in stable disease (p = .068). The NETseq ensemble classifier identified PRRT-naïve GEP-NETs with high accuracy (≥92%) and demonstrated a potential role in early treatment response monitoring in the PRRT setting. This blood-based, non-invasive, multi-analyte molecular method could be developed as a valuable adjunct to conventional methods in the detection and treatment response assessment in NET patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroendocrinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroendocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13462\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)因诊断延迟而出现转移。我们的目标是从外周血中找出与NET相关的生物标志物。本文报告了利用外周血 RNA-Seq 开发和验证多基因 NETseq 组合分类器的情况。对 178 名 NET 患者和 73 名健康供体的外周血样本进行了 RNA-Seq 扩增。从学习队列(59 名 PRRT-naïve GEP-NET 患者和 38 名健康捐献者)中确定了可区分的基因特征。结合随机森林(RF)、极梯度提升(XGBOOST)、梯度提升机(GBM)、支持向量机(SVM)和逻辑回归(LR)等五种机器学习算法的输出结果,对评估队列(n = 106)进行了训练和独立验证。在 PRRT 队列(n = 46)和 PRRT 反应监测队列(n = 16)中评估了 PRRT 反应。对177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT的反应采用RECIST 1.1标准进行评估。在学习队列中,根据 61 个基因特征训练的集合分类器区分 NET 和健康样本的准确率为 100%。在评估队列中,分类器对未经 PRRT 治疗的 GEP-NET 的灵敏度为 93%(95% CI:87.8%-98.03%),特异度为 91.4%(95% CI:82.1%-100%)(AUROC = 95.4%)。该分类器对不同肿瘤特征的灵敏度大于 87.5%,且优于血清 Chromogranin A 灵敏度(χ2 = 21.89,p = 4.161e-6)。在PRRT队列中,与无应答者相比,RECIST 1.1应答者在177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT后的NETseq预测得分明显较低。在一个独立的反应监测队列中,对配对样本(PRRT 前和 PRRT 第 2 或第 3 周期后)进行了分析。部分应答者的NETseq预测得分明显下降(p = .002),病情稳定者的NETseq预测得分略有下降(p = .068)。NETseq集合分类器识别PRRT无效GEP-NET的准确率很高(≥92%),在PRRT早期治疗反应监测中具有潜在作用。这种基于血液的非侵入性多分析分子方法可作为传统方法的重要辅助手段,用于检测和评估NET患者的治疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a peripheral blood RNA-seq based NETseq ensemble classifier: A potential novel tool for non-invasive detection and treatment response assessment in neuroendocrine tumor patients receiving 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are presented with metastases due to delayed diagnosis. We aimed to identify NET-related biomarkers from peripheral blood. The development and validation of a multi-gene NETseq ensemble classifier using peripheral blood RNA-Seq is reported. RNA-Seq was performed on peripheral blood samples from 178 NET patients and 73 healthy donors. Distinguishing gene features were identified from a learning cohort (59 PRRT-naïve GEP-NET patients and 38 healthy donors). Ensemble classifier combining the output of five machine learning algorithms viz. Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBOOST), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR) were trained and independently validated in the evaluation cohort (n = 106). The response to PRRT was evaluated in the PRRT cohort (n = 46) and the PRRT response monitoring cohort (n = 16). The response to 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT was assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria. The Ensemble classifier trained on 61 gene features, distinguished NET from healthy samples with 100% accuracy in the learning cohort. In an evaluation cohort, the classifier achieved 93% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.8%-98.03%) and 91.4% specificity (95% CI: 82.1%-100%) for PRRT-naïve GEP-NETs (AUROC = 95.4%). The classifier returned >87.5% sensitivity across different tumor characteristics and outperformed serum Chromogranin A sensitivity (χ2 = 21.89, p = 4.161e-6). In the PRRT cohort, RECIST 1.1 responders showed significantly lower NETseq prediction scores after 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT, in comparison to the non-responders. In an independent response monitoring cohort, paired samples (before PRRT and after 2nd or 3rd cycle of PRRT) were analyzed. The NETseq prediction score significantly decreased in partial responders (p = .002) and marginally reduced in stable disease (p = .068). The NETseq ensemble classifier identified PRRT-naïve GEP-NETs with high accuracy (≥92%) and demonstrated a potential role in early treatment response monitoring in the PRRT setting. This blood-based, non-invasive, multi-analyte molecular method could be developed as a valuable adjunct to conventional methods in the detection and treatment response assessment in NET patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Journal of Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neuroendocrinology provides the principal international focus for the newest ideas in classical neuroendocrinology and its expanding interface with the regulation of behavioural, cognitive, developmental, degenerative and metabolic processes. Through the rapid publication of original manuscripts and provocative review articles, it provides essential reading for basic scientists and clinicians researching in this rapidly expanding field. In determining content, the primary considerations are excellence, relevance and novelty. While Journal of Neuroendocrinology reflects the broad scientific and clinical interests of the BSN membership, the editorial team, led by Professor Julian Mercer, ensures that the journal’s ethos, authorship, content and purpose are those expected of a leading international publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信