Linjie Li, Chuanyi Huang, Wennan Liu, Jingge Li, Geru A, Xiaozhi Chen, Shichen Jiang, Yiwen Fang, Roger Sik-Yin Foo, Mark Yan-Yee Chan, Ying Yu, Yongle Li, Qing Yang, Xin Zhou
{"title":"心血管疾病患者从强化降脂治疗中获益的时间。","authors":"Linjie Li, Chuanyi Huang, Wennan Liu, Jingge Li, Geru A, Xiaozhi Chen, Shichen Jiang, Yiwen Fang, Roger Sik-Yin Foo, Mark Yan-Yee Chan, Ying Yu, Yongle Li, Qing Yang, Xin Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timing of the clinical benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), both before and after the advent of novel medications (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor [PCSK9i] and ezetimibe) in 2010, is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the time to benefit (TTB) from intensive lipid-lowering therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The investigators systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating intensive lipid-lowering therapy. The primary outcome was MACEs. Utilizing reconstructed individual participant data, Weibull survival curves were fitted to estimate the TTB for specific absolute risk reduction thresholds (0.002, 0.005, and 0.01).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven trials randomizing 92,180 adults aged between 58.2 and 63.6 years were identified. A TTB of 19.6 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 12.3 to 31.4) of intensive lipid-lowering was needed to prevent 1 MACE per 100 patients. Before 2010, when statin as the only option, a TTB for high-intensity statin therapy of 15.2 months (95 % CI: 6.52 to 35.5) was needed. After 2010, the TTB for PCSK9i-based, ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering on a background of statin therapy was 17.7 (95 % CI: 12.2 to 25.6) and 47.3 (95 % CI: 20.4 to 110) months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contemporary practice, to prevent 1 MACE in 100 individuals with established CVD, a TTB of 17.7 and 47.3 months was needed for PCSK9i-based and ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering therapy on a background of statin therapy, respectively. The observed variations across different drug regimens highlight the need for a personalized approach to treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to benefit of intensive lipid lowering therapy in individuals with cardiovascular disease.\",\"authors\":\"Linjie Li, Chuanyi Huang, Wennan Liu, Jingge Li, Geru A, Xiaozhi Chen, Shichen Jiang, Yiwen Fang, Roger Sik-Yin Foo, Mark Yan-Yee Chan, Ying Yu, Yongle Li, Qing Yang, Xin Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timing of the clinical benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), both before and after the advent of novel medications (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor [PCSK9i] and ezetimibe) in 2010, is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the time to benefit (TTB) from intensive lipid-lowering therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The investigators systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating intensive lipid-lowering therapy. The primary outcome was MACEs. Utilizing reconstructed individual participant data, Weibull survival curves were fitted to estimate the TTB for specific absolute risk reduction thresholds (0.002, 0.005, and 0.01).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven trials randomizing 92,180 adults aged between 58.2 and 63.6 years were identified. A TTB of 19.6 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 12.3 to 31.4) of intensive lipid-lowering was needed to prevent 1 MACE per 100 patients. Before 2010, when statin as the only option, a TTB for high-intensity statin therapy of 15.2 months (95 % CI: 6.52 to 35.5) was needed. After 2010, the TTB for PCSK9i-based, ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering on a background of statin therapy was 17.7 (95 % CI: 12.2 to 25.6) and 47.3 (95 % CI: 20.4 to 110) months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contemporary practice, to prevent 1 MACE in 100 individuals with established CVD, a TTB of 17.7 and 47.3 months was needed for PCSK9i-based and ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering therapy on a background of statin therapy, respectively. The observed variations across different drug regimens highlight the need for a personalized approach to treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Time to benefit of intensive lipid lowering therapy in individuals with cardiovascular disease.
Background: The timing of the clinical benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), both before and after the advent of novel medications (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor [PCSK9i] and ezetimibe) in 2010, is unclear.
Objective: To evaluate the time to benefit (TTB) from intensive lipid-lowering therapy.
Methods: The investigators systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating intensive lipid-lowering therapy. The primary outcome was MACEs. Utilizing reconstructed individual participant data, Weibull survival curves were fitted to estimate the TTB for specific absolute risk reduction thresholds (0.002, 0.005, and 0.01).
Results: Seven trials randomizing 92,180 adults aged between 58.2 and 63.6 years were identified. A TTB of 19.6 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 12.3 to 31.4) of intensive lipid-lowering was needed to prevent 1 MACE per 100 patients. Before 2010, when statin as the only option, a TTB for high-intensity statin therapy of 15.2 months (95 % CI: 6.52 to 35.5) was needed. After 2010, the TTB for PCSK9i-based, ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering on a background of statin therapy was 17.7 (95 % CI: 12.2 to 25.6) and 47.3 (95 % CI: 20.4 to 110) months, respectively.
Conclusions: In contemporary practice, to prevent 1 MACE in 100 individuals with established CVD, a TTB of 17.7 and 47.3 months was needed for PCSK9i-based and ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering therapy on a background of statin therapy, respectively. The observed variations across different drug regimens highlight the need for a personalized approach to treatment decisions.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. While preference is given to material of immediate practical concern, the science that underpins lipidology is forwarded by expert contributors so that evidence-based approaches to reducing cardiovascular and coronary heart disease can be made immediately available to our readers. Sections of the Journal will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.