Linjie Li MD , Chuanyi Huang MD , Wennan Liu MD , Jingge Li MD , Geru A MD , Xiaozhi Chen MD , Shichen Jiang MD , Yiwen Fang MD , Roger Sik-Yin Foo MD, PhD , Mark Yan-Yee Chan MD, PhD , Ying Yu MD, PhD , Yongle Li MD, PhD , Qing Yang MD, PhD , Xin Zhou MD, PhD
{"title":"心血管疾病患者从强化降脂治疗中获益的时间。","authors":"Linjie Li MD , Chuanyi Huang MD , Wennan Liu MD , Jingge Li MD , Geru A MD , Xiaozhi Chen MD , Shichen Jiang MD , Yiwen Fang MD , Roger Sik-Yin Foo MD, PhD , Mark Yan-Yee Chan MD, PhD , Ying Yu MD, PhD , Yongle Li MD, PhD , Qing Yang MD, PhD , Xin Zhou MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>The timing of the clinical benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), both before and after the advent of novel medications (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor [PCSK9i] and ezetimibe) in 2010, is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To evaluate the time to benefit (TTB) from intensive lipid-lowering therapy.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The investigators systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating intensive lipid-lowering therapy. The primary outcome was MACE. Utilizing reconstructed individual participant data, Weibull survival curves were fitted to estimate the TTB for specific absolute risk reduction thresholds (0.002, 0.005, and 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Seven trials randomizing 92,180 adults aged between 58.2 and 63.6 years were identified. A TTB of 19.6 months (95% CI: 12.3–31.4) of intensive lipid-lowering was needed to prevent 1 MACE per 100 patients. Before 2010, when statin was the only option, a TTB for high-intensity statin therapy of 15.2 months (95% CI: 6.52–35.5) was needed. After 2010, the TTB for PCSK9i-based, ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering on a background of statin therapy was 17.7 (95% CI: 12.2–25.6) and 47.3 (95% CI: 20.4–110) months, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>In contemporary practice, to prevent 1 MACE in 100 individuals with established CVD, a TTB of 17.7 and 47.3 months was needed for PCSK9i-based and ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering therapy on a background of statin therapy, respectively. The observed variations across different drug regimens highlight the need for a personalized approach to treatment decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to benefit of intensive lipid lowering therapy in individuals with cardiovascular disease\",\"authors\":\"Linjie Li MD , Chuanyi Huang MD , Wennan Liu MD , Jingge Li MD , Geru A MD , Xiaozhi Chen MD , Shichen Jiang MD , Yiwen Fang MD , Roger Sik-Yin Foo MD, PhD , Mark Yan-Yee Chan MD, PhD , Ying Yu MD, PhD , Yongle Li MD, PhD , Qing Yang MD, PhD , Xin Zhou MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>The timing of the clinical benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), both before and after the advent of novel medications (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor [PCSK9i] and ezetimibe) in 2010, is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To evaluate the time to benefit (TTB) from intensive lipid-lowering therapy.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The investigators systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating intensive lipid-lowering therapy. The primary outcome was MACE. Utilizing reconstructed individual participant data, Weibull survival curves were fitted to estimate the TTB for specific absolute risk reduction thresholds (0.002, 0.005, and 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Seven trials randomizing 92,180 adults aged between 58.2 and 63.6 years were identified. A TTB of 19.6 months (95% CI: 12.3–31.4) of intensive lipid-lowering was needed to prevent 1 MACE per 100 patients. Before 2010, when statin was the only option, a TTB for high-intensity statin therapy of 15.2 months (95% CI: 6.52–35.5) was needed. After 2010, the TTB for PCSK9i-based, ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering on a background of statin therapy was 17.7 (95% CI: 12.2–25.6) and 47.3 (95% CI: 20.4–110) months, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>In contemporary practice, to prevent 1 MACE in 100 individuals with established CVD, a TTB of 17.7 and 47.3 months was needed for PCSK9i-based and ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering therapy on a background of statin therapy, respectively. The observed variations across different drug regimens highlight the need for a personalized approach to treatment decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287424002599\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287424002599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Time to benefit of intensive lipid lowering therapy in individuals with cardiovascular disease
BACKGROUND
The timing of the clinical benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), both before and after the advent of novel medications (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor [PCSK9i] and ezetimibe) in 2010, is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the time to benefit (TTB) from intensive lipid-lowering therapy.
METHODS
The investigators systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating intensive lipid-lowering therapy. The primary outcome was MACE. Utilizing reconstructed individual participant data, Weibull survival curves were fitted to estimate the TTB for specific absolute risk reduction thresholds (0.002, 0.005, and 0.01).
RESULTS
Seven trials randomizing 92,180 adults aged between 58.2 and 63.6 years were identified. A TTB of 19.6 months (95% CI: 12.3–31.4) of intensive lipid-lowering was needed to prevent 1 MACE per 100 patients. Before 2010, when statin was the only option, a TTB for high-intensity statin therapy of 15.2 months (95% CI: 6.52–35.5) was needed. After 2010, the TTB for PCSK9i-based, ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering on a background of statin therapy was 17.7 (95% CI: 12.2–25.6) and 47.3 (95% CI: 20.4–110) months, respectively.
CONCLUSION
In contemporary practice, to prevent 1 MACE in 100 individuals with established CVD, a TTB of 17.7 and 47.3 months was needed for PCSK9i-based and ezetimibe-based intensive lipid-lowering therapy on a background of statin therapy, respectively. The observed variations across different drug regimens highlight the need for a personalized approach to treatment decisions.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner.
Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.