美国大型医疗系统在实施病理学家指导的综合基因组图谱分析后广泛采用精准抗癌疗法。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00226
Alexa K Dowdell, Ryan C Meng, Ann Vita, Bela Bapat, Douglas Hanes, Shu-Ching Chang, Lauren Harold, Cliff Wong, Hoifung Poon, Brock Schroeder, Roshanthi Weerasinghe, Rom Leidner, Walter J Urba, Carlo B Bifulco, Brian D Piening
{"title":"美国大型医疗系统在实施病理学家指导的综合基因组图谱分析后广泛采用精准抗癌疗法。","authors":"Alexa K Dowdell, Ryan C Meng, Ann Vita, Bela Bapat, Douglas Hanes, Shu-Ching Chang, Lauren Harold, Cliff Wong, Hoifung Poon, Brock Schroeder, Roshanthi Weerasinghe, Rom Leidner, Walter J Urba, Carlo B Bifulco, Brian D Piening","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Precision therapies and immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer care, with novel genomic biomarker-associated therapies being introduced into clinical practice rapidly, resulting in notable gains in patient survival. Despite this, there is significant variability in the utilization of tumor molecular profiling that spans the timing of test ordering, comprehensiveness of gene panels, and clinical decision support through therapy and trial recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To standardize testing, we designed a pathologist-directed test ordering system at the time of diagnosis using a 523-gene DNA/RNA hybrid comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) panel and extensive clinical decision support tools. To comprehensively characterize the clinical impact of this protocol, we developed a novel natural language processing (NLP)-based approach to extract clinical features from physician chart notes. We assessed test actionability rates, therapy choice, and outcomes across a set of 3,216 patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 49% of patients had at least one actionable genomic biomarker-driven-approved and/or guideline-recommended targeted or immunotherapy (IO) and 53% of patients would have been eligible for a precision therapy clinical trial from three large basket trials. When assessing CGP versus an in silico 50-gene panel, 67% of tumors compared with 33% harbored actionable alterations including clinical trials. Among patients with 6 months or more of follow-up, over 52% received a targeted therapy (TT) or IO, versus 32% who received conventional chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, patients receiving TT had significantly improved overall survival compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these data represent a major shift in standard clinical practice toward molecularly guided treatments (targeted and immunotherapies) over conventional systemic chemotherapy. As guidelines continue to evolve and more precision therapeutics gain approval, we expect this gap to continue to widen.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":"20 11","pages":"1523-1532"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Widespread Adoption of Precision Anticancer Therapies After Implementation of Pathologist-Directed Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Across a Large US Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Alexa K Dowdell, Ryan C Meng, Ann Vita, Bela Bapat, Douglas Hanes, Shu-Ching Chang, Lauren Harold, Cliff Wong, Hoifung Poon, Brock Schroeder, Roshanthi Weerasinghe, Rom Leidner, Walter J Urba, Carlo B Bifulco, Brian D Piening\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP.24.00226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Precision therapies and immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer care, with novel genomic biomarker-associated therapies being introduced into clinical practice rapidly, resulting in notable gains in patient survival. Despite this, there is significant variability in the utilization of tumor molecular profiling that spans the timing of test ordering, comprehensiveness of gene panels, and clinical decision support through therapy and trial recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To standardize testing, we designed a pathologist-directed test ordering system at the time of diagnosis using a 523-gene DNA/RNA hybrid comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) panel and extensive clinical decision support tools. To comprehensively characterize the clinical impact of this protocol, we developed a novel natural language processing (NLP)-based approach to extract clinical features from physician chart notes. We assessed test actionability rates, therapy choice, and outcomes across a set of 3,216 patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 49% of patients had at least one actionable genomic biomarker-driven-approved and/or guideline-recommended targeted or immunotherapy (IO) and 53% of patients would have been eligible for a precision therapy clinical trial from three large basket trials. When assessing CGP versus an in silico 50-gene panel, 67% of tumors compared with 33% harbored actionable alterations including clinical trials. Among patients with 6 months or more of follow-up, over 52% received a targeted therapy (TT) or IO, versus 32% who received conventional chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, patients receiving TT had significantly improved overall survival compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these data represent a major shift in standard clinical practice toward molecularly guided treatments (targeted and immunotherapies) over conventional systemic chemotherapy. As guidelines continue to evolve and more precision therapeutics gain approval, we expect this gap to continue to widen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"20 11\",\"pages\":\"1523-1532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623383/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:精准疗法和免疫疗法彻底改变了癌症治疗,与基因组生物标志物相关的新型疗法被迅速引入临床实践,从而显著提高了患者的生存率。尽管如此,肿瘤分子图谱的利用仍存在很大的差异,包括检测订购的时间、基因面板的全面性以及通过治疗和试验建议提供的临床决策支持:为了使检测标准化,我们设计了一个由病理学家指导的检测订购系统,在诊断时使用 523 个基因的 DNA/RNA 混合全面基因组图谱 (CGP) 面板和广泛的临床决策支持工具。为了全面描述该方案的临床影响,我们开发了一种基于自然语言处理(NLP)的新方法,从医生的病历记录中提取临床特征。我们对 3216 名晚期癌症患者的测试可操作性率、疗法选择和结果进行了评估:我们观察到,49%的患者至少有一种可操作的基因组生物标志物驱动的已获批准和/或指南推荐的靶向或免疫疗法(IO),53%的患者有资格参加三个大型篮子试验中的精准治疗临床试验。在评估CGP与硅学50个基因面板时,67%的肿瘤与33%的肿瘤存在包括临床试验在内的可操作改变。在随访6个月或更长时间的患者中,超过52%的患者接受了靶向治疗(TT)或IO,而32%的患者仅接受了传统化疗。此外,与单独接受化疗的患者相比,接受TT治疗的患者的总生存率明显提高(P < .001):总之,这些数据代表了标准临床实践的重大转变,即分子引导治疗(靶向治疗和免疫治疗)优于传统的全身化疗。随着指南的不断发展和更多精准治疗药物获得批准,我们预计这一差距将继续扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Widespread Adoption of Precision Anticancer Therapies After Implementation of Pathologist-Directed Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Across a Large US Health System.

Purpose: Precision therapies and immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer care, with novel genomic biomarker-associated therapies being introduced into clinical practice rapidly, resulting in notable gains in patient survival. Despite this, there is significant variability in the utilization of tumor molecular profiling that spans the timing of test ordering, comprehensiveness of gene panels, and clinical decision support through therapy and trial recommendations.

Methods: To standardize testing, we designed a pathologist-directed test ordering system at the time of diagnosis using a 523-gene DNA/RNA hybrid comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) panel and extensive clinical decision support tools. To comprehensively characterize the clinical impact of this protocol, we developed a novel natural language processing (NLP)-based approach to extract clinical features from physician chart notes. We assessed test actionability rates, therapy choice, and outcomes across a set of 3,216 patients with advanced cancer.

Results: We observed 49% of patients had at least one actionable genomic biomarker-driven-approved and/or guideline-recommended targeted or immunotherapy (IO) and 53% of patients would have been eligible for a precision therapy clinical trial from three large basket trials. When assessing CGP versus an in silico 50-gene panel, 67% of tumors compared with 33% harbored actionable alterations including clinical trials. Among patients with 6 months or more of follow-up, over 52% received a targeted therapy (TT) or IO, versus 32% who received conventional chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, patients receiving TT had significantly improved overall survival compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone (P < .001).

Conclusion: Overall, these data represent a major shift in standard clinical practice toward molecularly guided treatments (targeted and immunotherapies) over conventional systemic chemotherapy. As guidelines continue to evolve and more precision therapeutics gain approval, we expect this gap to continue to widen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信