泌尿妇科与结肠直肠外科盆底联合诊所成立一年。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Su-Wen Anne Mak, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Simone Meiqi Ong, Cheryl Xi Zi Chong, Hong Liang Chua, Jill Cheng Sim Lee
{"title":"泌尿妇科与结肠直肠外科盆底联合诊所成立一年。","authors":"Su-Wen Anne Mak, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Simone Meiqi Ong, Cheryl Xi Zi Chong, Hong Liang Chua, Jill Cheng Sim Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05968-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study is aimed at characterizing patients seen at a new combined pelvic floor clinic (CPFC) established at a tertiary women's hospital in Singapore. Study goals include identifying patterns of symptom clusters and reviewing management strategies compared with international care standards, improving understanding of complex female pelvic floor dysfunction, and guiding future development of clinical and ancillary support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of medical case record review for all patients seen at the CPFC between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. All patients seen at CPFC during this study period were included for analysis. Data were deidentified and aggregated, with analysis performed for descriptive and summary statistics. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six referrals were made to the CPFC, with 57 patients seen in 11 clinic sessions across the 12-month period. The most common reasons for referral were fecal or flatus incontinence (30, 52.6%), severe constipation or defecatory dysfunction (21.1%), and rectal prolapse (17.5%). Most patients (78.9%) had multiple symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our patient demographic profile aligns with known risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction, presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms-similar to PFCs worldwide. The new workflow and services were well positioned to address patients' needs, including those left previously untreated, or received uncoordinated care. Conservative approaches were first employed, like with other global PFCs. The combined multidisciplinary model of care resulted in good outcomes for patients managed both conservatively and surgically. Future studies to analyze patient satisfaction are planned.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Combined Urogynecology and Colorectal Surgery Pelvic Floor Clinic-1 Year On.\",\"authors\":\"Su-Wen Anne Mak, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Simone Meiqi Ong, Cheryl Xi Zi Chong, Hong Liang Chua, Jill Cheng Sim Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-024-05968-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study is aimed at characterizing patients seen at a new combined pelvic floor clinic (CPFC) established at a tertiary women's hospital in Singapore. Study goals include identifying patterns of symptom clusters and reviewing management strategies compared with international care standards, improving understanding of complex female pelvic floor dysfunction, and guiding future development of clinical and ancillary support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of medical case record review for all patients seen at the CPFC between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. All patients seen at CPFC during this study period were included for analysis. Data were deidentified and aggregated, with analysis performed for descriptive and summary statistics. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six referrals were made to the CPFC, with 57 patients seen in 11 clinic sessions across the 12-month period. The most common reasons for referral were fecal or flatus incontinence (30, 52.6%), severe constipation or defecatory dysfunction (21.1%), and rectal prolapse (17.5%). Most patients (78.9%) had multiple symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our patient demographic profile aligns with known risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction, presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms-similar to PFCs worldwide. The new workflow and services were well positioned to address patients' needs, including those left previously untreated, or received uncoordinated care. Conservative approaches were first employed, like with other global PFCs. The combined multidisciplinary model of care resulted in good outcomes for patients managed both conservatively and surgically. Future studies to analyze patient satisfaction are planned.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05968-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05968-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和假设:本研究旨在了解在新加坡一家三级妇女医院新成立的盆底联合诊所(CPFC)就诊的患者的特征。研究目标包括确定症状群的模式,并与国际护理标准相比审查管理策略,提高对复杂的女性盆底功能障碍的认识,并指导临床和辅助支持的未来发展:这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,对 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 31 日期间在 CPFC 就诊的所有患者的病例记录进行回顾。所有在研究期间在 CPFC 就诊的患者均纳入分析范围。数据经过去标识化和汇总,并进行了描述性和摘要统计分析。研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并放弃了知情同意:在 12 个月的时间里,CPFC 共收到 66 份转诊申请,在 11 次门诊中接诊了 57 名患者。最常见的转诊原因是大便或胀气失禁(30 例,占 52.6%)、严重便秘或排便功能障碍(21.1%)和直肠脱垂(17.5%)。大多数患者(78.9%)有多种症状:我们的患者人口统计学特征符合盆底功能障碍的已知风险因素,并伴有胃肠道症状,这与全球的 PFCs 相似。新的工作流程和服务能够很好地解决患者的需求,包括以前未得到治疗或未得到协调护理的患者。与全球其他初级保健中心一样,首先采用的是保守疗法。多学科综合治疗模式为接受保守治疗和手术治疗的患者带来了良好的治疗效果。今后计划开展研究,分析患者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Combined Urogynecology and Colorectal Surgery Pelvic Floor Clinic-1 Year On.

Introduction and hypothesis: This study is aimed at characterizing patients seen at a new combined pelvic floor clinic (CPFC) established at a tertiary women's hospital in Singapore. Study goals include identifying patterns of symptom clusters and reviewing management strategies compared with international care standards, improving understanding of complex female pelvic floor dysfunction, and guiding future development of clinical and ancillary support.

Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of medical case record review for all patients seen at the CPFC between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. All patients seen at CPFC during this study period were included for analysis. Data were deidentified and aggregated, with analysis performed for descriptive and summary statistics. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent.

Results: Sixty-six referrals were made to the CPFC, with 57 patients seen in 11 clinic sessions across the 12-month period. The most common reasons for referral were fecal or flatus incontinence (30, 52.6%), severe constipation or defecatory dysfunction (21.1%), and rectal prolapse (17.5%). Most patients (78.9%) had multiple symptoms.

Conclusions: Our patient demographic profile aligns with known risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction, presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms-similar to PFCs worldwide. The new workflow and services were well positioned to address patients' needs, including those left previously untreated, or received uncoordinated care. Conservative approaches were first employed, like with other global PFCs. The combined multidisciplinary model of care resulted in good outcomes for patients managed both conservatively and surgically. Future studies to analyze patient satisfaction are planned.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信