根据设备与动脉瘤体积比确定 Woven EndoBridge 尺寸的有效性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Elliot Pressman, Joshua H Weinberg, Ammad A Baig, Gersham J Rainone, Samantha Schimmel Ba, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Teagen Smith, Patrick Youssef, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui, Elad I Levy, Waldo R Guerrero, Maxim Mokin, Kunal Vakharia
{"title":"根据设备与动脉瘤体积比确定 Woven EndoBridge 尺寸的有效性。","authors":"Elliot Pressman, Joshua H Weinberg, Ammad A Baig, Gersham J Rainone, Samantha Schimmel Ba, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Teagen Smith, Patrick Youssef, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui, Elad I Levy, Waldo R Guerrero, Maxim Mokin, Kunal Vakharia","doi":"10.1177/15910199241298327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is a treatment modality available for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, specifically beneficial in wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. Conventional sizing methods rely on the manipulation of aneurysm width and height measurements. This results in frequent need for re-sizing after initial WEB insertion attempts. Previous studies have suggested that volume-based sizing may decrease this rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in three complex vascular centers in the United States from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2023. All patients who underwent attempted aneurysmal WEB embolization were included. Using three-dimensional angiogram reconstructions, we measured the aneurysm volume. We calculated the WEB volume and measured the WEB-aneurysm volume (WAVe) ratio. The primary outcome was whether a WEB required re-sizing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 cases were identified, 114 correctly sized and 19 incorrectly sized. Twelve patients (9.0%) required additional stent placement during WEB insertion. One patient (0.8%) had WEB abandonment. There were no differences in demographic or baseline characteristics between the size/re-sizing cohorts aside from aneurysm location (\"other\" and basilar locations increased the rate of re-sizing). The median WAVe ratio in our appropriately sized cohort was 0.997 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.826, 1.30) versus 1.14 in our re-sizing cohort (IQR 0.734, 1.51; <i>p</i> = 0.728). Using logistic regression, we identified a WAVe ratio ranging from 0.76 to 1.24 yielding > 80% probability of a successful sizing with 95% confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating volume-based measurements in aneurysm embolization with WEBs may improve rates of re-sizing but has an unclear effect on aneurysm occlusion. A WAVe ratio of 0.76-1.24 provides the greatest probability of appropriate initial WEB sizing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Woven EndoBridge sizing based on the device-to-aneurysm volume ratio.\",\"authors\":\"Elliot Pressman, Joshua H Weinberg, Ammad A Baig, Gersham J Rainone, Samantha Schimmel Ba, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Teagen Smith, Patrick Youssef, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui, Elad I Levy, Waldo R Guerrero, Maxim Mokin, Kunal Vakharia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241298327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is a treatment modality available for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, specifically beneficial in wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. Conventional sizing methods rely on the manipulation of aneurysm width and height measurements. This results in frequent need for re-sizing after initial WEB insertion attempts. Previous studies have suggested that volume-based sizing may decrease this rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in three complex vascular centers in the United States from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2023. All patients who underwent attempted aneurysmal WEB embolization were included. Using three-dimensional angiogram reconstructions, we measured the aneurysm volume. We calculated the WEB volume and measured the WEB-aneurysm volume (WAVe) ratio. The primary outcome was whether a WEB required re-sizing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 cases were identified, 114 correctly sized and 19 incorrectly sized. Twelve patients (9.0%) required additional stent placement during WEB insertion. One patient (0.8%) had WEB abandonment. There were no differences in demographic or baseline characteristics between the size/re-sizing cohorts aside from aneurysm location (\\\"other\\\" and basilar locations increased the rate of re-sizing). The median WAVe ratio in our appropriately sized cohort was 0.997 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.826, 1.30) versus 1.14 in our re-sizing cohort (IQR 0.734, 1.51; <i>p</i> = 0.728). Using logistic regression, we identified a WAVe ratio ranging from 0.76 to 1.24 yielding > 80% probability of a successful sizing with 95% confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating volume-based measurements in aneurysm embolization with WEBs may improve rates of re-sizing but has an unclear effect on aneurysm occlusion. A WAVe ratio of 0.76-1.24 provides the greatest probability of appropriate initial WEB sizing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241298327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241298327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Woven EndoBridge(WEB)是一种可用于治疗颅内动脉瘤的治疗方法,尤其对宽颈分叉动脉瘤有益。传统的尺寸测量方法依赖于对动脉瘤宽度和高度的测量。这导致在初次尝试插入 WEB 后,经常需要重新调整尺寸。之前的研究表明,基于容积的尺寸调整可能会降低这一比例:我们从 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日在美国的三个复杂血管中心开展了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。所有尝试过动脉瘤 WEB 栓塞术的患者都被纳入其中。通过三维血管造影重建,我们测量了动脉瘤的体积。我们计算了WEB体积,并测量了WEB-动脉瘤体积(WAVe)比值。主要结果是 WEB 是否需要重新调整大小:结果:共确定了 133 个病例,其中 114 例大小正确,19 例大小错误。12名患者(9.0%)在插入WEB时需要额外放置支架。一名患者(0.8%)放弃了 WEB。除了动脉瘤位置("其他 "和基底动脉瘤位置会增加重新调整大小的比例)外,大小/重新调整大小的组别之间在人口统计学或基线特征方面没有差异。大小合适队列的 WAVe 比率中位数为 0.997(四分位数间距 (IQR) 0.826,1.30),而大小调整队列的 WAVe 比率中位数为 1.14(四分位数间距 (IQR) 0.734,1.51;P = 0.728)。通过逻辑回归,我们确定了从 0.76 到 1.24 的 WAVe 比值,在 95% 的置信度下,成功调整大小的概率大于 80%:结论:在使用 WEB 进行动脉瘤栓塞时加入基于容积的测量可提高重新调整大小的成功率,但对动脉瘤闭塞的影响尚不明确。WAVe比值为0.76-1.24时,初始WEB尺寸合适的可能性最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of Woven EndoBridge sizing based on the device-to-aneurysm volume ratio.

Background: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is a treatment modality available for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, specifically beneficial in wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. Conventional sizing methods rely on the manipulation of aneurysm width and height measurements. This results in frequent need for re-sizing after initial WEB insertion attempts. Previous studies have suggested that volume-based sizing may decrease this rate.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in three complex vascular centers in the United States from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2023. All patients who underwent attempted aneurysmal WEB embolization were included. Using three-dimensional angiogram reconstructions, we measured the aneurysm volume. We calculated the WEB volume and measured the WEB-aneurysm volume (WAVe) ratio. The primary outcome was whether a WEB required re-sizing.

Results: A total of 133 cases were identified, 114 correctly sized and 19 incorrectly sized. Twelve patients (9.0%) required additional stent placement during WEB insertion. One patient (0.8%) had WEB abandonment. There were no differences in demographic or baseline characteristics between the size/re-sizing cohorts aside from aneurysm location ("other" and basilar locations increased the rate of re-sizing). The median WAVe ratio in our appropriately sized cohort was 0.997 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.826, 1.30) versus 1.14 in our re-sizing cohort (IQR 0.734, 1.51; p = 0.728). Using logistic regression, we identified a WAVe ratio ranging from 0.76 to 1.24 yielding > 80% probability of a successful sizing with 95% confidence.

Conclusions: Incorporating volume-based measurements in aneurysm embolization with WEBs may improve rates of re-sizing but has an unclear effect on aneurysm occlusion. A WAVe ratio of 0.76-1.24 provides the greatest probability of appropriate initial WEB sizing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信