左室收缩功能障碍患者新发左束支传导阻滞的预测因素及其预后价值

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
International heart journal Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1536/ihj.24-294
Mu-Zhang Li, Jia-Ying Chen, Shu-Fang Chen, Jin-Tao Wu, Lei-Ming Zhang, Xue-Jie Li, Hai-Tao Yang, Xian-Wei Fan, Jing-Jing Liu, Ling-Juan Meng
{"title":"左室收缩功能障碍患者新发左束支传导阻滞的预测因素及其预后价值","authors":"Mu-Zhang Li, Jia-Ying Chen, Shu-Fang Chen, Jin-Tao Wu, Lei-Ming Zhang, Xue-Jie Li, Hai-Tao Yang, Xian-Wei Fan, Jing-Jing Liu, Ling-Juan Meng","doi":"10.1536/ihj.24-294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It remains unclear whether elevated ventricular wall pressure and left ventricular enlargement in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) can lead to left bundle branch block (LBBB). In this study, 801 consecutive hospitalized patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 50% were enrolled. The primary outcome was the occurrence of new-onset LBBB or heart failure-related hospitalization, all-cause mortality, ventricular tachycardia, or implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) /cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). During a median follow-up of 56 months, 70 cases of new-onset LBBB were observed, with a cumulative incidence rate of 10.1%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.907, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.552-5.444, P = 0.001), coronary artery disease (CAD) (HR 6.680, 95% CI 3.451-12.930, P < 0.001), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (HR 6.394, 95% CI 3.501-11.675, P < 0.001), QRS duration (HR 1.018, 95% CI 1.010-1.027, P < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (HR 1.032, 95% CI 1.006-1.059, P = 0.016), and β-blockers (HR 0.327, 95% CI 0.199-0.536, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of new-onset LBBB. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated that patients with new-onset LBBB had a higher incidence of composite endpoint events (P < 0.001), heart failure-related hospitalization (P < 0.001), and ventricular tachycardia or implantation of an ICD or CRT (P < 0.001) than patients without new-onset LBBB. Moreover, new-onset LBBB (HR 1.603, 95% CI 1.207-2.129, P = 0.001) was an independent predictor of composite endpoint events.DCM, LVEDD, CAD, PAF, and QRS duration were independent predictive factors for the subsequent development of LBBB in patients with LVSD. New-onset LBBB was independently associated with a poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"1025-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Factors for New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Its Prognostic Value.\",\"authors\":\"Mu-Zhang Li, Jia-Ying Chen, Shu-Fang Chen, Jin-Tao Wu, Lei-Ming Zhang, Xue-Jie Li, Hai-Tao Yang, Xian-Wei Fan, Jing-Jing Liu, Ling-Juan Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1536/ihj.24-294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It remains unclear whether elevated ventricular wall pressure and left ventricular enlargement in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) can lead to left bundle branch block (LBBB). In this study, 801 consecutive hospitalized patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 50% were enrolled. The primary outcome was the occurrence of new-onset LBBB or heart failure-related hospitalization, all-cause mortality, ventricular tachycardia, or implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) /cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). During a median follow-up of 56 months, 70 cases of new-onset LBBB were observed, with a cumulative incidence rate of 10.1%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.907, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.552-5.444, P = 0.001), coronary artery disease (CAD) (HR 6.680, 95% CI 3.451-12.930, P < 0.001), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (HR 6.394, 95% CI 3.501-11.675, P < 0.001), QRS duration (HR 1.018, 95% CI 1.010-1.027, P < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (HR 1.032, 95% CI 1.006-1.059, P = 0.016), and β-blockers (HR 0.327, 95% CI 0.199-0.536, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of new-onset LBBB. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated that patients with new-onset LBBB had a higher incidence of composite endpoint events (P < 0.001), heart failure-related hospitalization (P < 0.001), and ventricular tachycardia or implantation of an ICD or CRT (P < 0.001) than patients without new-onset LBBB. Moreover, new-onset LBBB (HR 1.603, 95% CI 1.207-2.129, P = 0.001) was an independent predictor of composite endpoint events.DCM, LVEDD, CAD, PAF, and QRS duration were independent predictive factors for the subsequent development of LBBB in patients with LVSD. New-onset LBBB was independently associated with a poor prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International heart journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1025-1032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-294\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)患者的室壁压力升高和左室增大是否会导致左束支传导阻滞(LBBB),目前仍不清楚。在这项研究中,共有 801 名左心室射血分数小于 50% 的连续住院患者参与了研究。主要结果是发生新发 LBBB 或心衰相关住院、全因死亡率、室性心动过速或植入植入式心律转复除颤器 (ICD) / 心脏再同步化疗法 (CRT)。在中位随访 56 个月期间,共观察到 70 例新发 LBBB,累计发病率为 10.1%。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,阵发性心房颤动(PAF)(危险比 [HR] 2.907,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.552-5.444,P = 0.001)、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)(HR 6.680,95% CI 3.451-12.930,P < 0.001)、扩张型心肌病(DCM)(HR 6.394,95% CI 3.501-11.675,P <0.001)、QRS持续时间(HR 1.018,95% CI 1.010-1.027,P <0.001)、左室舒张末期尺寸(LVEDD)(HR 1.032,95% CI 1.006-1.059,P = 0.016)和β受体阻滞剂(HR 0.327,95% CI 0.199-0.536,P <0.001)是新发 LBBB 的独立预测因素。卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线分析表明,与无新发 LBBB 的患者相比,新发 LBBB 患者发生复合终点事件(P < 0.001)、心衰相关住院(P < 0.001)、室性心动过速或植入 ICD 或 CRT(P < 0.001)的几率更高。此外,新发 LBBB(HR 1.603,95% CI 1.207-2.129,P = 0.001)是复合终点事件的独立预测因素。DCM、LVEDD、CAD、PAF 和 QRS 持续时间是 LVSD 患者随后发生 LBBB 的独立预测因素。新发LBBB与不良预后密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Factors for New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Its Prognostic Value.

It remains unclear whether elevated ventricular wall pressure and left ventricular enlargement in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) can lead to left bundle branch block (LBBB). In this study, 801 consecutive hospitalized patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 50% were enrolled. The primary outcome was the occurrence of new-onset LBBB or heart failure-related hospitalization, all-cause mortality, ventricular tachycardia, or implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) /cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). During a median follow-up of 56 months, 70 cases of new-onset LBBB were observed, with a cumulative incidence rate of 10.1%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.907, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.552-5.444, P = 0.001), coronary artery disease (CAD) (HR 6.680, 95% CI 3.451-12.930, P < 0.001), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (HR 6.394, 95% CI 3.501-11.675, P < 0.001), QRS duration (HR 1.018, 95% CI 1.010-1.027, P < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (HR 1.032, 95% CI 1.006-1.059, P = 0.016), and β-blockers (HR 0.327, 95% CI 0.199-0.536, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of new-onset LBBB. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated that patients with new-onset LBBB had a higher incidence of composite endpoint events (P < 0.001), heart failure-related hospitalization (P < 0.001), and ventricular tachycardia or implantation of an ICD or CRT (P < 0.001) than patients without new-onset LBBB. Moreover, new-onset LBBB (HR 1.603, 95% CI 1.207-2.129, P = 0.001) was an independent predictor of composite endpoint events.DCM, LVEDD, CAD, PAF, and QRS duration were independent predictive factors for the subsequent development of LBBB in patients with LVSD. New-onset LBBB was independently associated with a poor prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信