中老年人家庭固体燃料使用与多病症轨迹之间的关系:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446688
Yiting Li, Bingjie Wu, Bingbing Fan, Jiali Lv, Chunxia Li, Chang Su, Aidong Liu, Tao Zhang
{"title":"中老年人家庭固体燃料使用与多病症轨迹之间的关系:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。","authors":"Yiting Li, Bingjie Wu, Bingbing Fan, Jiali Lv, Chunxia Li, Chang Su, Aidong Liu, Tao Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effect of household solid fuel usage on the multimorbidity trajectories among middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the 2011-2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, the group-based trajectory modeling and the multinomial logistic regression model were used to explore the relationship between multimorbidity trajectories of older adults with different fuel types, duration of solid fuel usage, and potential interaction with PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Three multimorbidity trajectory patterns were identified by group-based trajectory modeling and labeled as \"non-chronic morbidity\" (no disease increase), \"newly developing multimorbidity\" (diseases grew from 0 to 2), and \"multi-chronic multimorbidity\" (diseases grew from 2 to 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to \"Non-chronic morbidity,\" solid fuel was significantly associated with adverse multimorbidity trajectories, with an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.33 (1.11, 1.60) and 1.35 (1.18, 1.55) for newly developing and multi-chronic group, respectively. An adverse multimorbidity trajectory tended to be established with longer durations of solid fuel usage than \"Non-chronic morbidity.\" For \"Newly-developing multimorbidity,\" the ORs (95% CI) for 1-7 years and ≥ 8 years of solid fuel usage were 1.16 (0.94, 1.42) and 1.41 (1.12, 1.76), respectively, with <i>P</i> trend=0.001, while in \"Multi-chronic multimorbidity,\" those were 1.25 (1.07, 1.47) and 1.68 (1.41, 2.00), respectively, with <i>P</i> trend <0.001. In the interaction analysis, the association between solid fuel usage and trajectories was significant only in areas where PM<sub>2.5</sub> was lower than 50 μg/m<sup>3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the middle-aged and older Chinese population, a higher risk of multimorbidity trajectory is associated with household solid fuel usage, especially in the areas with lower PM<sub>2.5</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1446688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between household solid fuel usage and trajectories of multimorbidity among middle-aged and older adults: a nationwide population-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yiting Li, Bingjie Wu, Bingbing Fan, Jiali Lv, Chunxia Li, Chang Su, Aidong Liu, Tao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effect of household solid fuel usage on the multimorbidity trajectories among middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the 2011-2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, the group-based trajectory modeling and the multinomial logistic regression model were used to explore the relationship between multimorbidity trajectories of older adults with different fuel types, duration of solid fuel usage, and potential interaction with PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Three multimorbidity trajectory patterns were identified by group-based trajectory modeling and labeled as \\\"non-chronic morbidity\\\" (no disease increase), \\\"newly developing multimorbidity\\\" (diseases grew from 0 to 2), and \\\"multi-chronic multimorbidity\\\" (diseases grew from 2 to 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to \\\"Non-chronic morbidity,\\\" solid fuel was significantly associated with adverse multimorbidity trajectories, with an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.33 (1.11, 1.60) and 1.35 (1.18, 1.55) for newly developing and multi-chronic group, respectively. An adverse multimorbidity trajectory tended to be established with longer durations of solid fuel usage than \\\"Non-chronic morbidity.\\\" For \\\"Newly-developing multimorbidity,\\\" the ORs (95% CI) for 1-7 years and ≥ 8 years of solid fuel usage were 1.16 (0.94, 1.42) and 1.41 (1.12, 1.76), respectively, with <i>P</i> trend=0.001, while in \\\"Multi-chronic multimorbidity,\\\" those were 1.25 (1.07, 1.47) and 1.68 (1.41, 2.00), respectively, with <i>P</i> trend <0.001. In the interaction analysis, the association between solid fuel usage and trajectories was significant only in areas where PM<sub>2.5</sub> was lower than 50 μg/m<sup>3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the middle-aged and older Chinese population, a higher risk of multimorbidity trajectory is associated with household solid fuel usage, especially in the areas with lower PM<sub>2.5</sub>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1446688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551997/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446688\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在探讨家庭固体燃料使用情况对中老年人多病性轨迹的影响:方法:基于2011-2018年中国健康与退休纵向研究,采用基于组的轨迹模型和多项式逻辑回归模型,探讨不同燃料类型、使用固体燃料的持续时间以及与PM2.5的潜在交互作用对中老年人多发病轨迹的影响。通过基于分组的轨迹建模,确定了三种多病模式,分别为 "非慢性发病"(疾病没有增加)、"新发多病"(疾病从 0 增加到 2)和 "多慢性多病"(疾病从 2 增加到 4):与 "非慢性发病率 "相比,固体燃料与不良多病化轨迹显著相关,新发病组和多病组的几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)分别为 1.33(1.11, 1.60)和 1.35(1.18, 1.55)。与 "非慢性发病率 "相比,使用固体燃料的时间越长,多发病的不良轨迹越明显。对于 "新发多病",使用固体燃料 1-7 年和≥ 8 年的 ORs(95% CI)分别为 1.16(0.94,1.42)和 1.41(1.12,1.76),P 趋势=0.001;而对于 "多慢性多病",使用固体燃料 1-7 年和≥ 8 年的 ORs(95% CI)分别为 1.25(1.07,1.47)和 1.68(1.41,2.00),P 趋势 2.5 低于 50 μg/m3:结论:对于中国中老年人群而言,家庭固体燃料的使用与较高的多病风险轨迹有关,尤其是在 PM2.5 较低的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between household solid fuel usage and trajectories of multimorbidity among middle-aged and older adults: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Background: This study aimed to explore the effect of household solid fuel usage on the multimorbidity trajectories among middle-aged and older adults.

Methods: Based on the 2011-2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, the group-based trajectory modeling and the multinomial logistic regression model were used to explore the relationship between multimorbidity trajectories of older adults with different fuel types, duration of solid fuel usage, and potential interaction with PM2.5. Three multimorbidity trajectory patterns were identified by group-based trajectory modeling and labeled as "non-chronic morbidity" (no disease increase), "newly developing multimorbidity" (diseases grew from 0 to 2), and "multi-chronic multimorbidity" (diseases grew from 2 to 4).

Results: Compared to "Non-chronic morbidity," solid fuel was significantly associated with adverse multimorbidity trajectories, with an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.33 (1.11, 1.60) and 1.35 (1.18, 1.55) for newly developing and multi-chronic group, respectively. An adverse multimorbidity trajectory tended to be established with longer durations of solid fuel usage than "Non-chronic morbidity." For "Newly-developing multimorbidity," the ORs (95% CI) for 1-7 years and ≥ 8 years of solid fuel usage were 1.16 (0.94, 1.42) and 1.41 (1.12, 1.76), respectively, with P trend=0.001, while in "Multi-chronic multimorbidity," those were 1.25 (1.07, 1.47) and 1.68 (1.41, 2.00), respectively, with P trend <0.001. In the interaction analysis, the association between solid fuel usage and trajectories was significant only in areas where PM2.5 was lower than 50 μg/m3.

Conclusion: For the middle-aged and older Chinese population, a higher risk of multimorbidity trajectory is associated with household solid fuel usage, especially in the areas with lower PM2.5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信