欧洲各国在神经电生理学培训和认证方面存在的差异:RRFS/EAN 调查。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1464946
Vlad Tiu, João Durães, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Nina Vashchenko, Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez, Alice Accorroni, Vanessa Carvalho, Giacomo Sferruzza, Luca Cuffaro
{"title":"欧洲各国在神经电生理学培训和认证方面存在的差异:RRFS/EAN 调查。","authors":"Vlad Tiu, João Durães, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Nina Vashchenko, Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez, Alice Accorroni, Vanessa Carvalho, Giacomo Sferruzza, Luca Cuffaro","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1464946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurosonology is a vital paraclinical investigation in modern neurology. However, access to education and certification in neurosonology for neurology residents and young specialists in Europe is challenging, and comprehensive data regarding this topic are scarce. Information regarding difficulties in neurosonology training across Europe may help bring this topic under the spotlight and act as a call for the harmonization of curricula across the continent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an online survey targeting European neurology residents and young specialists, focusing on neurosonology training and certification. The survey was conducted between May and September 2023 and received responses from 282 participants representing 37 European countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were disparities in neurosonology training during residency, with 6 (16.2%) out of 37 countries reporting a dedicated curriculum. The respondents expressed an overall lack of satisfaction with theoretical knowledge (rating their experience as very poor 28.0%, poor 20.2%, neutral 25.9%, good 19.3%, and very good 6.6%) and practical skills gained during their training (rating their experience as very poor 30.9%, poor 18.9%, neutral 22.6%, good 18.1%, and very good 9.5%). A total of 282 respondents (5.7%), 16 held a national certification in neurosonology, claiming obstacles such as high costs of certification and a limited number of certifying centers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This survey reveals significant variations in neurosonology training across Europe, indicating difficulties in obtaining certification. Despite the increasing importance of neurosonology, many neurologists feel inadequately prepared and lack practical training during residency, emphasizing the need for better and more standardized access.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey underscores challenges and disparities in neurosonology training and certification in Europe. Standardization of curricula and increased awareness about available certifications are crucial to address these issues. The interest in European Certification suggests a potential solution for enhancing neurosonology training at the international level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1464946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived discrepancies in neurosonology training and certification across Europe: a RRFS/EAN survey.\",\"authors\":\"Vlad Tiu, João Durães, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Nina Vashchenko, Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez, Alice Accorroni, Vanessa Carvalho, Giacomo Sferruzza, Luca Cuffaro\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneur.2024.1464946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurosonology is a vital paraclinical investigation in modern neurology. However, access to education and certification in neurosonology for neurology residents and young specialists in Europe is challenging, and comprehensive data regarding this topic are scarce. Information regarding difficulties in neurosonology training across Europe may help bring this topic under the spotlight and act as a call for the harmonization of curricula across the continent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an online survey targeting European neurology residents and young specialists, focusing on neurosonology training and certification. The survey was conducted between May and September 2023 and received responses from 282 participants representing 37 European countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were disparities in neurosonology training during residency, with 6 (16.2%) out of 37 countries reporting a dedicated curriculum. The respondents expressed an overall lack of satisfaction with theoretical knowledge (rating their experience as very poor 28.0%, poor 20.2%, neutral 25.9%, good 19.3%, and very good 6.6%) and practical skills gained during their training (rating their experience as very poor 30.9%, poor 18.9%, neutral 22.6%, good 18.1%, and very good 9.5%). A total of 282 respondents (5.7%), 16 held a national certification in neurosonology, claiming obstacles such as high costs of certification and a limited number of certifying centers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This survey reveals significant variations in neurosonology training across Europe, indicating difficulties in obtaining certification. Despite the increasing importance of neurosonology, many neurologists feel inadequately prepared and lack practical training during residency, emphasizing the need for better and more standardized access.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey underscores challenges and disparities in neurosonology training and certification in Europe. Standardization of curricula and increased awareness about available certifications are crucial to address these issues. The interest in European Certification suggests a potential solution for enhancing neurosonology training at the international level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1464946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1464946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1464946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介神经电生理学是现代神经病学中一项重要的准临床研究。然而,在欧洲,神经病学住院医师和年轻专家获得神经电生理学教育和认证的机会却很难获得,而且有关这一主题的综合数据也很少。有关欧洲各国神经电生理学培训困难的信息可能有助于使这一话题成为关注焦点,并呼吁协调整个欧洲大陆的课程:我们针对欧洲神经病学住院医师和年轻专家进行了一次在线调查,重点是神经电生理学培训和认证。调查于 2023 年 5 月至 9 月进行,收到了来自 37 个欧洲国家的 282 位参与者的回复:结果:住院医师培训期间的神经电生理学培训存在差异,37 个国家中有 6 个国家(16.2%)报告有专门的课程。受访者对培训期间获得的理论知识和实践技能总体不满意(分别为非常差 28.0%、差 20.2%、中性 25.9%、好 19.3%、非常好 6.6%)(分别为非常差 30.9%、差 18.9%、中性 22.6%、好 18.1%、非常好 9.5%)。共有 282 名受访者(5.7%)中有 16 人持有神经电生理学国家认证,他们声称存在认证费用高昂和认证中心数量有限等障碍:讨论:这项调查显示,欧洲各国在神经电生理学培训方面存在很大差异,这表明在获得认证方面存在困难。尽管神经电生理学的重要性与日俱增,但许多神经科医生认为自己准备不足,在住院医师培训期间缺乏实践培训,因此强调需要更好、更标准化的培训机会:调查强调了欧洲在神经电生理学培训和认证方面存在的挑战和差异。课程标准化和提高对现有认证的认识对解决这些问题至关重要。对欧洲认证的兴趣为在国际层面加强神经电生理学培训提供了一个潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived discrepancies in neurosonology training and certification across Europe: a RRFS/EAN survey.

Introduction: Neurosonology is a vital paraclinical investigation in modern neurology. However, access to education and certification in neurosonology for neurology residents and young specialists in Europe is challenging, and comprehensive data regarding this topic are scarce. Information regarding difficulties in neurosonology training across Europe may help bring this topic under the spotlight and act as a call for the harmonization of curricula across the continent.

Methods: We performed an online survey targeting European neurology residents and young specialists, focusing on neurosonology training and certification. The survey was conducted between May and September 2023 and received responses from 282 participants representing 37 European countries.

Results: There were disparities in neurosonology training during residency, with 6 (16.2%) out of 37 countries reporting a dedicated curriculum. The respondents expressed an overall lack of satisfaction with theoretical knowledge (rating their experience as very poor 28.0%, poor 20.2%, neutral 25.9%, good 19.3%, and very good 6.6%) and practical skills gained during their training (rating their experience as very poor 30.9%, poor 18.9%, neutral 22.6%, good 18.1%, and very good 9.5%). A total of 282 respondents (5.7%), 16 held a national certification in neurosonology, claiming obstacles such as high costs of certification and a limited number of certifying centers.

Discussion: This survey reveals significant variations in neurosonology training across Europe, indicating difficulties in obtaining certification. Despite the increasing importance of neurosonology, many neurologists feel inadequately prepared and lack practical training during residency, emphasizing the need for better and more standardized access.

Conclusion: The survey underscores challenges and disparities in neurosonology training and certification in Europe. Standardization of curricula and increased awareness about available certifications are crucial to address these issues. The interest in European Certification suggests a potential solution for enhancing neurosonology training at the international level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信