MetaCompare 2.0:生态和人类健康抗蚀体风险的差异排序。

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Monjura Afrin Rumi, Min Oh, Benjamin C Davis, Connor L Brown, Adheesh Juvekar, Peter J Vikesland, Amy Pruden, Liqing Zhang
{"title":"MetaCompare 2.0:生态和人类健康抗蚀体风险的差异排序。","authors":"Monjura Afrin Rumi, Min Oh, Benjamin C Davis, Connor L Brown, Adheesh Juvekar, Peter J Vikesland, Amy Pruden, Liqing Zhang","doi":"10.1093/femsec/fiae155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While numerous environmental factors contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), quantifying their relative contributions remains a fundamental challenge. Similarly, it is important to differentiate acute human health risks from environmental exposure, versus broader ecological risk of ARG evolution and spread across microbial taxa. Recent studies have proposed various methods for achieving such aims. Here, we introduce MetaCompare 2.0, which improves upon original MetaCompare pipeline by differentiating indicators of human health resistome risk (HHRR, potential for human pathogens of acute resistance concern to acquire ARGs) from ecological resistome risk (ERR, overall mobility of ARGs and potential for pathogen acquisition). The updated pipeline's sensitivity was demonstrated by analyzing diverse publicly-available metagenomes from wastewater, surface water, soil, sediment, human gut, and synthetic microbial communities. MetaCompare 2.0 provided distinct rankings of the metagenomes according to both HHRR and ERR, with both scores trending higher when influenced by anthropogenic impact or other stress. We evaluated the robustness of the pipeline to sequence assembly methods, sequencing depth, contig count, and metagenomic library coverage bias. The risk scores were remarkably consistent despite variations in these technological aspects. We packaged the improved pipeline into a publicly-available web service (http://metacompare.cs.vt.edu/) that provides an easy-to-use interface for computing resistome risk scores and visualizing results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12312,"journal":{"name":"FEMS microbiology ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MetaCompare 2.0: Differential ranking of ecological and human health resistome risks.\",\"authors\":\"Monjura Afrin Rumi, Min Oh, Benjamin C Davis, Connor L Brown, Adheesh Juvekar, Peter J Vikesland, Amy Pruden, Liqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/femsec/fiae155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While numerous environmental factors contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), quantifying their relative contributions remains a fundamental challenge. Similarly, it is important to differentiate acute human health risks from environmental exposure, versus broader ecological risk of ARG evolution and spread across microbial taxa. Recent studies have proposed various methods for achieving such aims. Here, we introduce MetaCompare 2.0, which improves upon original MetaCompare pipeline by differentiating indicators of human health resistome risk (HHRR, potential for human pathogens of acute resistance concern to acquire ARGs) from ecological resistome risk (ERR, overall mobility of ARGs and potential for pathogen acquisition). The updated pipeline's sensitivity was demonstrated by analyzing diverse publicly-available metagenomes from wastewater, surface water, soil, sediment, human gut, and synthetic microbial communities. MetaCompare 2.0 provided distinct rankings of the metagenomes according to both HHRR and ERR, with both scores trending higher when influenced by anthropogenic impact or other stress. We evaluated the robustness of the pipeline to sequence assembly methods, sequencing depth, contig count, and metagenomic library coverage bias. The risk scores were remarkably consistent despite variations in these technological aspects. We packaged the improved pipeline into a publicly-available web service (http://metacompare.cs.vt.edu/) that provides an easy-to-use interface for computing resistome risk scores and visualizing results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEMS microbiology ecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEMS microbiology ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiae155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEMS microbiology ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiae155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有许多环境因素会导致抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的传播,但量化这些因素的相对作用仍然是一个基本挑战。同样,重要的是要区分环境暴露对人类健康造成的急性风险,以及 ARG 在微生物类群中进化和传播所带来的更广泛的生态风险。最近的研究提出了各种方法来实现这一目标。在此,我们介绍 MetaCompare 2.0,它通过区分人类健康抗性组风险指标(HHRR,急性抗性关注的人类病原体获得 ARGs 的可能性)和生态抗性组风险指标(ERR,ARGs 的整体流动性和病原体获得的可能性),对原来的 MetaCompare 管道进行了改进。通过分析来自废水、地表水、土壤、沉积物、人类肠道和合成微生物群落的各种公开的元基因组,证明了更新管道的灵敏度。MetaCompare 2.0 根据 HHRR 和 ERR 对元基因组进行了不同的排序,当受到人为影响或其他压力时,这两个分数都呈上升趋势。我们评估了该管道对序列组装方法、测序深度、等位基因数和元基因组文库覆盖偏差的稳健性。尽管这些技术方面存在差异,但风险评分却非常一致。我们将改进后的管道打包成一个公开的网络服务 (http://metacompare.cs.vt.edu/),为计算抗性组风险得分和可视化结果提供了一个易于使用的界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MetaCompare 2.0: Differential ranking of ecological and human health resistome risks.

While numerous environmental factors contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), quantifying their relative contributions remains a fundamental challenge. Similarly, it is important to differentiate acute human health risks from environmental exposure, versus broader ecological risk of ARG evolution and spread across microbial taxa. Recent studies have proposed various methods for achieving such aims. Here, we introduce MetaCompare 2.0, which improves upon original MetaCompare pipeline by differentiating indicators of human health resistome risk (HHRR, potential for human pathogens of acute resistance concern to acquire ARGs) from ecological resistome risk (ERR, overall mobility of ARGs and potential for pathogen acquisition). The updated pipeline's sensitivity was demonstrated by analyzing diverse publicly-available metagenomes from wastewater, surface water, soil, sediment, human gut, and synthetic microbial communities. MetaCompare 2.0 provided distinct rankings of the metagenomes according to both HHRR and ERR, with both scores trending higher when influenced by anthropogenic impact or other stress. We evaluated the robustness of the pipeline to sequence assembly methods, sequencing depth, contig count, and metagenomic library coverage bias. The risk scores were remarkably consistent despite variations in these technological aspects. We packaged the improved pipeline into a publicly-available web service (http://metacompare.cs.vt.edu/) that provides an easy-to-use interface for computing resistome risk scores and visualizing results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FEMS microbiology ecology
FEMS microbiology ecology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
132
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: FEMS Microbiology Ecology aims to ensure efficient publication of high-quality papers that are original and provide a significant contribution to the understanding of microbial ecology. The journal contains Research Articles and MiniReviews on fundamental aspects of the ecology of microorganisms in natural soil, aquatic and atmospheric habitats, including extreme environments, and in artificial or managed environments. Research papers on pure cultures and in the areas of plant pathology and medical, food or veterinary microbiology will be published where they provide valuable generic information on microbial ecology. Papers can deal with culturable and non-culturable forms of any type of microorganism: bacteria, archaea, filamentous fungi, yeasts, protozoa, cyanobacteria, algae or viruses. In addition, the journal will publish Perspectives, Current Opinion and Controversy Articles, Commentaries and Letters to the Editor on topical issues in microbial ecology. - Application of ecological theory to microbial ecology - Interactions and signalling between microorganisms and with plants and animals - Interactions between microorganisms and their physicochemical enviornment - Microbial aspects of biogeochemical cycles and processes - Microbial community ecology - Phylogenetic and functional diversity of microbial communities - Evolutionary biology of microorganisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信