大学辍学:对主要决定因素的系统回顾(2020-2024 年)。

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.154263.2
Raul Quincho Apumayta, Javier Carrillo Cayllahua, Abraham Ccencho Pari, Vilma Inga Choque, Juan Carlos Cárdenas Valverde, Delsio Huamán Ataypoma
{"title":"大学辍学:对主要决定因素的系统回顾(2020-2024 年)。","authors":"Raul Quincho Apumayta, Javier Carrillo Cayllahua, Abraham Ccencho Pari, Vilma Inga Choque, Juan Carlos Cárdenas Valverde, Delsio Huamán Ataypoma","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.154263.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research is a systematic review aimed at synthesizing scientific evidence on the causes of university dropout, focusing on the subcategories of vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects between 2020 and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Only articles addressing university dropout were considered, analyzing dimensions such as vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects. Articles published in indexed scientific journals with double-blind, double-blind peer, or open reviews between 2020 and June 2024 were included. The main databases used were Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. To assess the risk of bias in qualitative studies, the criteria from the article \"Validity criteria for qualitative research: three epistemological strands for the same purpose\" were used. For quantitative studies, the criteria from the article \"Evaluating survey research in articles published in Library Science journals\" were followed. For mixed-method studies, both sets of criteria were combined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 studies were included: 15 quantitative (65.22%), 3 qualitative (13.04%), and 5 mixed-method (21.74%). All studies (100%) addressed the subcategories of socioeconomic status and institutional aspects. Regarding the academic performance subcategory, 86% of the studies addressed it, while the vocational guidance subcategory was covered by 73.91% of the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects are crucial for reducing university dropout. Providing adequate professional guidance, academic support, financial assistance, and strong institutional support is fundamental to improving student retention and academic success.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"942"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University Dropout: A Systematic Review of the Main Determinant Factors (2020-2024).\",\"authors\":\"Raul Quincho Apumayta, Javier Carrillo Cayllahua, Abraham Ccencho Pari, Vilma Inga Choque, Juan Carlos Cárdenas Valverde, Delsio Huamán Ataypoma\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.154263.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research is a systematic review aimed at synthesizing scientific evidence on the causes of university dropout, focusing on the subcategories of vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects between 2020 and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Only articles addressing university dropout were considered, analyzing dimensions such as vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects. Articles published in indexed scientific journals with double-blind, double-blind peer, or open reviews between 2020 and June 2024 were included. The main databases used were Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. To assess the risk of bias in qualitative studies, the criteria from the article \\\"Validity criteria for qualitative research: three epistemological strands for the same purpose\\\" were used. For quantitative studies, the criteria from the article \\\"Evaluating survey research in articles published in Library Science journals\\\" were followed. For mixed-method studies, both sets of criteria were combined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 studies were included: 15 quantitative (65.22%), 3 qualitative (13.04%), and 5 mixed-method (21.74%). All studies (100%) addressed the subcategories of socioeconomic status and institutional aspects. Regarding the academic performance subcategory, 86% of the studies addressed it, while the vocational guidance subcategory was covered by 73.91% of the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects are crucial for reducing university dropout. Providing adequate professional guidance, academic support, financial assistance, and strong institutional support is fundamental to improving student retention and academic success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561383/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154263.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154263.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本研究是一项系统性综述,旨在归纳 2020 年至 2024 年 6 月间有关大学辍学原因的科学证据,重点关注职业指导、学业成绩、社会经济地位和制度方面等子类别:方法:只考虑涉及大学辍学的文章,并从职业指导、学业成绩、社会经济地位和制度等方面进行分析。研究纳入了 2020 年至 2024 年 6 月期间发表在有索引的科学期刊上的文章,这些文章有双盲、双盲同行评审或公开评审。使用的主要数据库为 Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar。在评估定性研究的偏倚风险时,采用了《定性研究的有效性标准:出于同一目的的三种认识论》一文中的标准。对于定量研究,则采用《评估图书馆学期刊上发表的文章中的调查研究》一文中的标准。对于混合方法研究,则将两套标准结合使用:结果:共纳入 23 项研究:结果:共纳入 23 项研究:15 项定量研究(占 65.22%)、3 项定性研究(占 13.04%)和 5 项混合方法研究(占 21.74%)。所有研究(100%)都涉及社会经济地位和机构方面这两个子类别。关于学习成绩子类别,86%的研究涉及到这一子类别,而 73.91%的研究涉及到职业指导子类别:结论:职业指导、学习成绩、社会经济地位和制度方面对减少大学辍学至关重要。提供充分的专业指导、学业支持、经济援助和强有力的机构支持是提高学生保留率和学业成功率的根本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
University Dropout: A Systematic Review of the Main Determinant Factors (2020-2024).

Introduction: This research is a systematic review aimed at synthesizing scientific evidence on the causes of university dropout, focusing on the subcategories of vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects between 2020 and June 2024.

Methods: Only articles addressing university dropout were considered, analyzing dimensions such as vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects. Articles published in indexed scientific journals with double-blind, double-blind peer, or open reviews between 2020 and June 2024 were included. The main databases used were Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. To assess the risk of bias in qualitative studies, the criteria from the article "Validity criteria for qualitative research: three epistemological strands for the same purpose" were used. For quantitative studies, the criteria from the article "Evaluating survey research in articles published in Library Science journals" were followed. For mixed-method studies, both sets of criteria were combined.

Results: A total of 23 studies were included: 15 quantitative (65.22%), 3 qualitative (13.04%), and 5 mixed-method (21.74%). All studies (100%) addressed the subcategories of socioeconomic status and institutional aspects. Regarding the academic performance subcategory, 86% of the studies addressed it, while the vocational guidance subcategory was covered by 73.91% of the studies.

Conclusions: Vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects are crucial for reducing university dropout. Providing adequate professional guidance, academic support, financial assistance, and strong institutional support is fundamental to improving student retention and academic success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信