肉类和脂肪含量对汉堡肉特征的影响:使用成像和感官技术的综合方法。

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
María Cardona, Jose M Barat, Isabel Fernández-Segovia, Raúl Grau
{"title":"肉类和脂肪含量对汉堡肉特征的影响:使用成像和感官技术的综合方法。","authors":"María Cardona, Jose M Barat, Isabel Fernández-Segovia, Raúl Grau","doi":"10.1177/10820132241297672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fat level and meat cut type on burger meat through color, texture, image, and sensory analyses, and to explore the ability of the imaging technique as a complementary tool for consumer quality perception. For this purpose, burger meat samples were prepared by combining pork and beef meat (50/50%) with other nonmeat ingredients. The differences between samples were fat level: around 15 g fat/100 g (code HF) or 10.5 g fat/100 g (code LF); cut types: from cow carcasses (code C) or yearling (code Y). Instrumental color and texture measures analysis, an image analysis, and a sensory evaluation were carried out on samples (raw and cooked) at two times: day 0 and day 1 before expiry dates. The results showed that the samples made with meat from cows presented lower L* and higher a* and b* values than the samples made from yearling. However, the fat level did not affect this parameter. This same pattern was observed for the image measurements. Regarding texture, the samples with higher fat content (and lower moisture content) had higher hardness values. Generally, meat type had no effect on textural parameters. The samples that consumers gave the highest overall acceptance scores were those made of cow meat at both fat content levels. These samples also had the highest raw and cooked color scores. The fat level slightly affected hardness, with the same pattern observed for the instrumental measures of texture. The analyses showed a good correlation between instrumental techniques and sensory evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12331,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Technology International","volume":" ","pages":"10820132241297672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of meat type and fat level on burger meat characteristics: A combined approach using imaging and sensory techniques.\",\"authors\":\"María Cardona, Jose M Barat, Isabel Fernández-Segovia, Raúl Grau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10820132241297672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fat level and meat cut type on burger meat through color, texture, image, and sensory analyses, and to explore the ability of the imaging technique as a complementary tool for consumer quality perception. For this purpose, burger meat samples were prepared by combining pork and beef meat (50/50%) with other nonmeat ingredients. The differences between samples were fat level: around 15 g fat/100 g (code HF) or 10.5 g fat/100 g (code LF); cut types: from cow carcasses (code C) or yearling (code Y). Instrumental color and texture measures analysis, an image analysis, and a sensory evaluation were carried out on samples (raw and cooked) at two times: day 0 and day 1 before expiry dates. The results showed that the samples made with meat from cows presented lower L* and higher a* and b* values than the samples made from yearling. However, the fat level did not affect this parameter. This same pattern was observed for the image measurements. Regarding texture, the samples with higher fat content (and lower moisture content) had higher hardness values. Generally, meat type had no effect on textural parameters. The samples that consumers gave the highest overall acceptance scores were those made of cow meat at both fat content levels. These samples also had the highest raw and cooked color scores. The fat level slightly affected hardness, with the same pattern observed for the instrumental measures of texture. The analyses showed a good correlation between instrumental techniques and sensory evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Technology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10820132241297672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Technology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132241297672\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Technology International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132241297672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过颜色、质地、图像和感官分析,评估脂肪含量和切肉类型对汉堡肉的影响,并探索成像技术作为消费者质量感知辅助工具的能力。为此,我们将猪肉和牛肉(各占 50%)与其他非肉类配料混合制成汉堡肉样品。样品之间的差异在于脂肪含量:约 15 克脂肪/100 克(代码 HF)或 10.5 克脂肪/100 克(代码 LF);切割类型:来自牛胴体(代码 C)或一岁牛(代码 Y)。在保质期前的第 0 天和第 1 天这两个时间段,对样品(生的和熟的)进行了色泽和质地测量分析、图像分析和感官评估。结果表明,用奶牛肉制作的样品比用一岁羔羊肉制作的样品的 L* 值低,a* 和 b* 值高。然而,脂肪含量并不影响这一参数。在图像测量中也观察到了同样的模式。在质地方面,脂肪含量较高(水分含量较低)的样品硬度值较高。一般来说,肉的种类对质地参数没有影响。消费者总体接受度得分最高的样品是两种脂肪含量水平下都由牛肉制成的样品。这些样品的生熟色泽得分也最高。脂肪含量对硬度略有影响,质地的仪器测量结果也是如此。分析表明,仪器技术与感官评价之间存在良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of meat type and fat level on burger meat characteristics: A combined approach using imaging and sensory techniques.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fat level and meat cut type on burger meat through color, texture, image, and sensory analyses, and to explore the ability of the imaging technique as a complementary tool for consumer quality perception. For this purpose, burger meat samples were prepared by combining pork and beef meat (50/50%) with other nonmeat ingredients. The differences between samples were fat level: around 15 g fat/100 g (code HF) or 10.5 g fat/100 g (code LF); cut types: from cow carcasses (code C) or yearling (code Y). Instrumental color and texture measures analysis, an image analysis, and a sensory evaluation were carried out on samples (raw and cooked) at two times: day 0 and day 1 before expiry dates. The results showed that the samples made with meat from cows presented lower L* and higher a* and b* values than the samples made from yearling. However, the fat level did not affect this parameter. This same pattern was observed for the image measurements. Regarding texture, the samples with higher fat content (and lower moisture content) had higher hardness values. Generally, meat type had no effect on textural parameters. The samples that consumers gave the highest overall acceptance scores were those made of cow meat at both fat content levels. These samples also had the highest raw and cooked color scores. The fat level slightly affected hardness, with the same pattern observed for the instrumental measures of texture. The analyses showed a good correlation between instrumental techniques and sensory evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science and Technology International
Food Science and Technology International 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science and Technology International (FSTI) shares knowledge from leading researchers of food science and technology. Covers food processing and engineering, food safety and preservation, food biotechnology, and physical, chemical and sensory properties of foods. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信