肺癌和戒烟个性化护理的基因组学见解:激励高危人群采取循证健康措施。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Tony Chen, Giang Pham, Louis Fox, Nina Adler, Xiaoyu Wang, Jingning Zhang, Jinyoung Byun, Younghun Han, Gretchen R B Saunders, Dajiang Liu, Michael J Bray, Alex T Ramsey, James McKay, Laura J Bierut, Christopher I Amos, Rayjean J Hung, Xihong Lin, Haoyu Zhang, Li-Shiun Chen
{"title":"肺癌和戒烟个性化护理的基因组学见解:激励高危人群采取循证健康措施。","authors":"Tony Chen, Giang Pham, Louis Fox, Nina Adler, Xiaoyu Wang, Jingning Zhang, Jinyoung Byun, Younghun Han, Gretchen R B Saunders, Dajiang Liu, Michael J Bray, Alex T Ramsey, James McKay, Laura J Bierut, Christopher I Amos, Rayjean J Hung, Xihong Lin, Haoyu Zhang, Li-Shiun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer and tobacco use pose significant global health challenges, necessitating a comprehensive translational roadmap for improved prevention strategies such as cancer screening and tobacco treatment, which are currently under-utilised. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) may further motivate health behaviour change in primary care for lung cancer in diverse populations. In this work, we introduce the GREAT care paradigm, which integrates PRSs within comprehensive patient risk profiles to motivate positive health behaviour changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed PRSs using large-scale multi-ancestry genome-wide association studies and standardised PRS distributions across all ancestries. We validated our PRSs in 561,776 individuals of diverse ancestry from the GISC Trial, UK Biobank (UKBB), and All of Us Research Program (AoU).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Significant odds ratios (ORs) for lung cancer and difficulty quitting smoking were observed in both UKBB and AoU. For lung cancer, the ORs for individuals in the highest risk group (top 20% versus bottom 20%) were 1.85 (95% CI: 1.58-2.18) in UKBB and 2.39 (95% CI: 1.93-2.97) in AoU. For difficulty quitting smoking, the ORs (top 33% versus bottom 33%) were 1.36 (95% CI: 1.32-1.41) in UKBB and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.28-1.36) in AoU.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our PRS-based intervention model leverages large-scale genetic data for robust risk assessment across populations, which will be evaluated in two cluster-randomised clinical trials. This approach integrates genomic insights into primary care, promising improved outcomes in cancer prevention and tobacco treatment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health, NIH Intramural Research Program, National Science Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"110 ","pages":"105441"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic insights for personalised care in lung cancer and smoking cessation: motivating at-risk individuals toward evidence-based health practices.\",\"authors\":\"Tony Chen, Giang Pham, Louis Fox, Nina Adler, Xiaoyu Wang, Jingning Zhang, Jinyoung Byun, Younghun Han, Gretchen R B Saunders, Dajiang Liu, Michael J Bray, Alex T Ramsey, James McKay, Laura J Bierut, Christopher I Amos, Rayjean J Hung, Xihong Lin, Haoyu Zhang, Li-Shiun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer and tobacco use pose significant global health challenges, necessitating a comprehensive translational roadmap for improved prevention strategies such as cancer screening and tobacco treatment, which are currently under-utilised. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) may further motivate health behaviour change in primary care for lung cancer in diverse populations. In this work, we introduce the GREAT care paradigm, which integrates PRSs within comprehensive patient risk profiles to motivate positive health behaviour changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed PRSs using large-scale multi-ancestry genome-wide association studies and standardised PRS distributions across all ancestries. We validated our PRSs in 561,776 individuals of diverse ancestry from the GISC Trial, UK Biobank (UKBB), and All of Us Research Program (AoU).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Significant odds ratios (ORs) for lung cancer and difficulty quitting smoking were observed in both UKBB and AoU. For lung cancer, the ORs for individuals in the highest risk group (top 20% versus bottom 20%) were 1.85 (95% CI: 1.58-2.18) in UKBB and 2.39 (95% CI: 1.93-2.97) in AoU. For difficulty quitting smoking, the ORs (top 33% versus bottom 33%) were 1.36 (95% CI: 1.32-1.41) in UKBB and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.28-1.36) in AoU.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our PRS-based intervention model leverages large-scale genetic data for robust risk assessment across populations, which will be evaluated in two cluster-randomised clinical trials. This approach integrates genomic insights into primary care, promising improved outcomes in cancer prevention and tobacco treatment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health, NIH Intramural Research Program, National Science Foundation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"105441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105441\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌和烟草使用对全球健康构成重大挑战,因此有必要制定一个全面的转化路线图,以改进癌症筛查和烟草治疗等预防策略,目前这些策略还未得到充分利用。多基因风险评分(PRS)可进一步促进不同人群在肺癌初级保健中改变健康行为。在这项工作中,我们介绍了 GREAT 护理范例,该范例将多基因风险评分纳入全面的患者风险档案,以激励积极的健康行为改变:方法:我们利用大规模的多宗族全基因组关联研究制定了PRS,并对所有宗族的PRS分布进行了标准化。我们在来自 GISC 试验、英国生物库 (UKBB) 和我们所有人研究计划 (AoU) 的 561,776 名不同血统的个体中验证了我们的 PRS:在英国生物库(UKBB)和全美研究计划(AoU)中都观察到了肺癌和戒烟困难的显著几率比(ORs)。就肺癌而言,最高风险组(前20%与后20%)的OR值在UKBB中为1.85(95% CI:1.58-2.18),在AoU中为2.39(95% CI:1.93-2.97)。在戒烟困难方面,英国和澳大利亚的ORs(前33%与后33%)分别为1.36(95% CI:1.32-1.41)和1.32(95% CI:1.28-1.36):我们基于 PRS 的干预模型利用大规模基因数据对不同人群进行稳健的风险评估,并将在两项分组随机临床试验中进行评估。这种方法将基因组学见解融入初级保健,有望改善癌症预防和烟草治疗的效果:美国国立卫生研究院、美国国立卫生研究院校内研究计划、美国国家科学基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genomic insights for personalised care in lung cancer and smoking cessation: motivating at-risk individuals toward evidence-based health practices.

Background: Lung cancer and tobacco use pose significant global health challenges, necessitating a comprehensive translational roadmap for improved prevention strategies such as cancer screening and tobacco treatment, which are currently under-utilised. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) may further motivate health behaviour change in primary care for lung cancer in diverse populations. In this work, we introduce the GREAT care paradigm, which integrates PRSs within comprehensive patient risk profiles to motivate positive health behaviour changes.

Methods: We developed PRSs using large-scale multi-ancestry genome-wide association studies and standardised PRS distributions across all ancestries. We validated our PRSs in 561,776 individuals of diverse ancestry from the GISC Trial, UK Biobank (UKBB), and All of Us Research Program (AoU).

Findings: Significant odds ratios (ORs) for lung cancer and difficulty quitting smoking were observed in both UKBB and AoU. For lung cancer, the ORs for individuals in the highest risk group (top 20% versus bottom 20%) were 1.85 (95% CI: 1.58-2.18) in UKBB and 2.39 (95% CI: 1.93-2.97) in AoU. For difficulty quitting smoking, the ORs (top 33% versus bottom 33%) were 1.36 (95% CI: 1.32-1.41) in UKBB and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.28-1.36) in AoU.

Interpretation: Our PRS-based intervention model leverages large-scale genetic data for robust risk assessment across populations, which will be evaluated in two cluster-randomised clinical trials. This approach integrates genomic insights into primary care, promising improved outcomes in cancer prevention and tobacco treatment.

Funding: National Institutes of Health, NIH Intramural Research Program, National Science Foundation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信