用 Ella™ 和 Lumipulse™ 测量认知障碍患者血清和脑脊液神经丝轻链浓度的比较。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Teresa Urbano, Riccardo Maramotti, Manuela Tondelli, Chiara Gallingani, Chiara Carbone, Najara Iacovino, Giulia Vinceti, Giovanna Zamboni, Annalisa Chiari, Roberta Bedin
{"title":"用 Ella™ 和 Lumipulse™ 测量认知障碍患者血清和脑脊液神经丝轻链浓度的比较。","authors":"Teresa Urbano, Riccardo Maramotti, Manuela Tondelli, Chiara Gallingani, Chiara Carbone, Najara Iacovino, Giulia Vinceti, Giovanna Zamboni, Annalisa Chiari, Roberta Bedin","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14212408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neurofilament light chain proteins (NfLs) are considered a promising biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in several neurological diseases. Their measurement in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with dementia may be especially useful. Our aim was to compare the NfL measurement performance of two advanced technologies, specifically the Ella™ microfluidic platform and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system, in patients with cognitive disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty subjects with neurodegenerative cognitive disorders (10 with Alzheimer's Disease, 10 with Frontotemporal Dementia, and 10 with non-progressive Mild Cognitive Impairment) seen at the Cognitive Neurology Clinic of Modena University Hospital (Italy) underwent CSF and serum NfL measurement with both the Ella™ microfluidic platform (Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system for the CLEIA (Fujirebio Inc., Ghent, Belgium). Correlation and regression analyses were applied to assess the association between NfL concentrations obtained with the two assays in CSF and serum. The Passing-Bablok regression method was employed to evaluate the agreement between the assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were high correlations between the two assays (r = 0.976, 95% CI. 0.950-0.989 for CSF vs. r = 0.923, 95% CI 0.842-0.964 for serum). A Passing-Bablok regression model was estimated to explain the relationship between the two assays, allowing us to switch from one to the other when only one assay was available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a good degree of correlation between the two methods in patients with neurocognitive disorders. We also established a method that will allow comparisons between results obtained with either technique, allowing for meta-analyses and larger sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Chain Concentrations Measured by Ella™ and Lumipulse™ in Patients with Cognitive Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Urbano, Riccardo Maramotti, Manuela Tondelli, Chiara Gallingani, Chiara Carbone, Najara Iacovino, Giulia Vinceti, Giovanna Zamboni, Annalisa Chiari, Roberta Bedin\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics14212408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neurofilament light chain proteins (NfLs) are considered a promising biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in several neurological diseases. Their measurement in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with dementia may be especially useful. Our aim was to compare the NfL measurement performance of two advanced technologies, specifically the Ella™ microfluidic platform and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system, in patients with cognitive disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty subjects with neurodegenerative cognitive disorders (10 with Alzheimer's Disease, 10 with Frontotemporal Dementia, and 10 with non-progressive Mild Cognitive Impairment) seen at the Cognitive Neurology Clinic of Modena University Hospital (Italy) underwent CSF and serum NfL measurement with both the Ella™ microfluidic platform (Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system for the CLEIA (Fujirebio Inc., Ghent, Belgium). Correlation and regression analyses were applied to assess the association between NfL concentrations obtained with the two assays in CSF and serum. The Passing-Bablok regression method was employed to evaluate the agreement between the assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were high correlations between the two assays (r = 0.976, 95% CI. 0.950-0.989 for CSF vs. r = 0.923, 95% CI 0.842-0.964 for serum). A Passing-Bablok regression model was estimated to explain the relationship between the two assays, allowing us to switch from one to the other when only one assay was available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a good degree of correlation between the two methods in patients with neurocognitive disorders. We also established a method that will allow comparisons between results obtained with either technique, allowing for meta-analyses and larger sample sizes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"14 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212408\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:神经丝蛋白轻链(NfLs)被认为是多种神经系统疾病中神经轴受损的一种有前途的生物标志物。对痴呆症患者血清和脑脊液(CSF)中神经丝轻链蛋白的测量尤其有用。我们的目的是比较两种先进技术(特别是 Ella™ 微流控平台和 Lumipulse™ 全自动系统)在认知障碍患者中的 NfL 测量性能:意大利摩德纳大学医院认知神经学诊所的 30 名神经退行性认知障碍患者(10 名阿尔茨海默病患者、10 名前额颞叶痴呆患者和 10 名非进行性轻度认知障碍患者)使用 Ella™ 微流控平台(Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA)和用于 CLEIA 的 Lumipulse™ 全自动系统(Fujirebio Inc、比利时根特)。相关分析和回归分析用于评估两种检测方法在脑脊液和血清中获得的 NfL 浓度之间的关联。Passing-Bablok 回归法用于评估两种检测方法之间的一致性:结果:两种检测方法之间存在高度相关性(r = 0.976,95% CI.CSF 的相关性为 0.976,95% CI 为 0.950-0.989;血清的相关性为 0.923,95% CI 为 0.842-0.964)。我们估算了一个 Passing-Bablok 回归模型来解释这两种检测方法之间的关系,这样当只有一种检测方法可用时,我们就可以将其中一种转换为另一种:结论:我们发现这两种方法在神经认知障碍患者中具有很好的相关性。结论:我们发现这两种方法在神经认知障碍患者中具有很好的相关性。我们还建立了一种方法,可以对两种方法的结果进行比较,从而进行荟萃分析和扩大样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Chain Concentrations Measured by Ella™ and Lumipulse™ in Patients with Cognitive Impairment.

Objective: Neurofilament light chain proteins (NfLs) are considered a promising biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in several neurological diseases. Their measurement in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with dementia may be especially useful. Our aim was to compare the NfL measurement performance of two advanced technologies, specifically the Ella™ microfluidic platform and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system, in patients with cognitive disorders.

Methods: Thirty subjects with neurodegenerative cognitive disorders (10 with Alzheimer's Disease, 10 with Frontotemporal Dementia, and 10 with non-progressive Mild Cognitive Impairment) seen at the Cognitive Neurology Clinic of Modena University Hospital (Italy) underwent CSF and serum NfL measurement with both the Ella™ microfluidic platform (Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system for the CLEIA (Fujirebio Inc., Ghent, Belgium). Correlation and regression analyses were applied to assess the association between NfL concentrations obtained with the two assays in CSF and serum. The Passing-Bablok regression method was employed to evaluate the agreement between the assays.

Results: There were high correlations between the two assays (r = 0.976, 95% CI. 0.950-0.989 for CSF vs. r = 0.923, 95% CI 0.842-0.964 for serum). A Passing-Bablok regression model was estimated to explain the relationship between the two assays, allowing us to switch from one to the other when only one assay was available.

Conclusions: We found a good degree of correlation between the two methods in patients with neurocognitive disorders. We also established a method that will allow comparisons between results obtained with either technique, allowing for meta-analyses and larger sample sizes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信