如果给治疗师一个网络：治疗师对患者基于 EMA 的网络模型反应的定性分析。

IF 3.2 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1002/cpp.70013

Mila Hall, Annika A. Wagner, Paloma V. Scherner, Julian A. Rubel

{"title":"如果给治疗师一个网络：治疗师对患者基于 EMA 的网络模型反应的定性分析。","authors":"Mila Hall, Annika A. Wagner, Paloma V. Scherner, Julian A. Rubel","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Network models hold much promise for use in the form of personalized feedback, which the TheraNet Project aims to investigate. In the present study, we share therapists' first reactions to patient network models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Therapists (<i>N</i> = 24) were taught to interpret the network models based on their patient's data. They were provided with concrete use suggestions at the end of the workshop. The workshops were analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis. The resulting codes were then grouped thematically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Therapists spoke about using the networks for “case conceptualization”, “therapy planning”, and “psychoeducation”, but also commented on the “study design”. Before the concrete suggestions, therapists most frequently voiced thoughts on its uses for “case conceptualization”. After the suggestions, “psychoeducation” was mentioned most frequently.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Therapists intuitively connected network models to case conceptualizations. Once concrete suggestions were provided, therapists more frequently discussed networks as psychoeducative tools.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models\",\"authors\":\"Mila Hall, Annika A. Wagner, Paloma V. Scherner, Julian A. Rubel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Network models hold much promise for use in the form of personalized feedback, which the TheraNet Project aims to investigate. In the present study, we share therapists' first reactions to patient network models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Therapists (<i>N</i> = 24) were taught to interpret the network models based on their patient's data. They were provided with concrete use suggestions at the end of the workshop. The workshops were analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis. The resulting codes were then grouped thematically.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Therapists spoke about using the networks for “case conceptualization”, “therapy planning”, and “psychoeducation”, but also commented on the “study design”. Before the concrete suggestions, therapists most frequently voiced thoughts on its uses for “case conceptualization”. After the suggestions, “psychoeducation” was mentioned most frequently.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Therapists intuitively connected network models to case conceptualizations. Once concrete suggestions were provided, therapists more frequently discussed networks as psychoeducative tools.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：网络模型在个性化反馈形式中大有可为，TheraNet 项目旨在对此进行研究。在本研究中，我们分享了治疗师对基于生态瞬间评估（EMA）数据的患者网络模型的第一反应：方法：治疗师（24 人）学习如何根据患者数据解释网络模型。工作坊结束时向他们提供了具体的使用建议。工作坊采用描述性定性内容分析法进行分析。然后按主题对所得代码进行分组：治疗师们谈到了将网络用于 "病例概念化"、"治疗计划 "和 "心理教育"，但也对 "研究设计 "发表了意见。在提出具体建议之前，治疗师最常表达的想法是将网络用于 "病例概念化"。在提出建议之后，"心理教育 "被提及的频率最高：治疗师凭直觉将网络模型与病例概念化联系起来。结论：治疗师直观地将网络模型与病例概念化联系在一起。一旦提供了具体建议，治疗师就会更频繁地讨论网络作为心理教育工具的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models

查看原文本刊更多论文

If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models

Objective

Network models hold much promise for use in the form of personalized feedback, which the TheraNet Project aims to investigate. In the present study, we share therapists' first reactions to patient network models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.

Method

Therapists (N = 24) were taught to interpret the network models based on their patient's data. They were provided with concrete use suggestions at the end of the workshop. The workshops were analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis. The resulting codes were then grouped thematically.

Results

Therapists spoke about using the networks for “case conceptualization”, “therapy planning”, and “psychoeducation”, but also commented on the “study design”. Before the concrete suggestions, therapists most frequently voiced thoughts on its uses for “case conceptualization”. After the suggestions, “psychoeducation” was mentioned most frequently.

Conclusions

Therapists intuitively connected network models to case conceptualizations. Once concrete suggestions were provided, therapists more frequently discussed networks as psychoeducative tools.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

5.60%

发文量

106

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.