维生素和矿物质补充剂:它们与疲劳有关吗?

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sisi Xie, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Vanessa Kraege
{"title":"维生素和矿物质补充剂:它们与疲劳有关吗?","authors":"Sisi Xie, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Vanessa Kraege","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Vitamin/mineral supplements (VMS) and vitamin/mineral and/or dietary supplements (VMDS) are commonly consumed, based on the belief of their invigorating properties. Still, the association of VMS/VMDS with fatigue in the general population remains sparse and conclusions are mixed. This study aimed to understand the association between VMS/VMDS and fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cross-sectional studies (2014-2017 and 2018-2021) conducted on a population-based cohort. Participants were divided into VMS/VMDS users and non-users. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 14-item version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2084 (50.8% female, 61.7±9.8 years) and 1728 (49.6% female, 64.1±9.3 years) were included in the first and second surveys, respectively. In the first survey, after multivariable analysis, no association was found between VMS use and FSS: adjusted mean±sem 3.04±0.13 vs. 2.82±0.03 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.083, while users scored higher in the CFS: 6.17±0.22 vs. 5.72±0.06 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.048. In the second survey, no association was found between VMS use and FSS (2.83±0.19 vs. 2.84±0.03, p=0.952) and CFS (5.38±0.33 vs. 5.61±0.06, p=0.504). In the first survey, VMDS users scored higher in both FSS (3.03±0.06 vs. 2.76±0.04, p<0.001) and CFS (6.19±0.11 vs. 5.58±0.06, p<0.001) while no differences were found in the second survey in both FSS (2.93±0.07 vs. 2.81±0.04, p=0.161) and CFS (5.78±0.12 vs. 5.54±0.07, p=0.088) CONCLUSION: In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors found no consistent association between VMS consumption and fatigue. Participants taking VMDS tended to present with higher fatigue scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin and mineral supplements: Are they associated with fatigue?\",\"authors\":\"Sisi Xie, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Vanessa Kraege\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Vitamin/mineral supplements (VMS) and vitamin/mineral and/or dietary supplements (VMDS) are commonly consumed, based on the belief of their invigorating properties. Still, the association of VMS/VMDS with fatigue in the general population remains sparse and conclusions are mixed. This study aimed to understand the association between VMS/VMDS and fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cross-sectional studies (2014-2017 and 2018-2021) conducted on a population-based cohort. Participants were divided into VMS/VMDS users and non-users. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 14-item version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2084 (50.8% female, 61.7±9.8 years) and 1728 (49.6% female, 64.1±9.3 years) were included in the first and second surveys, respectively. In the first survey, after multivariable analysis, no association was found between VMS use and FSS: adjusted mean±sem 3.04±0.13 vs. 2.82±0.03 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.083, while users scored higher in the CFS: 6.17±0.22 vs. 5.72±0.06 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.048. In the second survey, no association was found between VMS use and FSS (2.83±0.19 vs. 2.84±0.03, p=0.952) and CFS (5.38±0.33 vs. 5.61±0.06, p=0.504). In the first survey, VMDS users scored higher in both FSS (3.03±0.06 vs. 2.76±0.04, p<0.001) and CFS (6.19±0.11 vs. 5.58±0.06, p<0.001) while no differences were found in the second survey in both FSS (2.93±0.07 vs. 2.81±0.04, p=0.161) and CFS (5.78±0.12 vs. 5.54±0.07, p=0.088) CONCLUSION: In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors found no consistent association between VMS consumption and fatigue. Participants taking VMDS tended to present with higher fatigue scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:维生素/矿物质补充剂(VMS)和维生素/矿物质和/或膳食补充剂(VMDS)是人们经常食用的食物,因为人们相信它们具有提神醒脑的功效。然而,在普通人群中,维生素补充剂/矿物质补充剂与疲劳的关系仍然很少,结论也不尽相同。本研究旨在了解VMS/VMDS与疲劳之间的关系:对基于人群的队列进行了两项横断面研究(2014-2017 年和 2018-2021 年)。参与者分为VMS/VMDS使用者和非使用者。使用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)和14个项目版的查尔德疲劳量表(CFS)评估疲劳程度:第一次和第二次调查分别纳入了 2084 人(50.8% 为女性,61.7±9.8 岁)和 1728 人(49.6% 为女性,64.1±9.3 岁)。在第一次调查中,经过多变量分析后发现,VMS 的使用与 FSS 之间没有关联:调整后的平均值(±sem)分别为 3.04±0.13 vs. 使用者和非使用者为 2.82±0.03,P=0.083;而使用者的 CFS 得分更高:使用者和非使用者分别为 6.17±0.22 vs. 5.72±0.06,P=0.048。在第二次调查中,VMS 的使用与 FSS(2.83±0.19 vs. 2.84±0.03,p=0.952)和 CFS(5.38±0.33 vs. 5.61±0.06,p=0.504)之间没有关联。在第一次调查中,VMDS 使用者在 FSS(3.03±0.06 vs. 2.76±0.04,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vitamin and mineral supplements: Are they associated with fatigue?

Background and aims: Vitamin/mineral supplements (VMS) and vitamin/mineral and/or dietary supplements (VMDS) are commonly consumed, based on the belief of their invigorating properties. Still, the association of VMS/VMDS with fatigue in the general population remains sparse and conclusions are mixed. This study aimed to understand the association between VMS/VMDS and fatigue.

Methods: Two cross-sectional studies (2014-2017 and 2018-2021) conducted on a population-based cohort. Participants were divided into VMS/VMDS users and non-users. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 14-item version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).

Results: Overall, 2084 (50.8% female, 61.7±9.8 years) and 1728 (49.6% female, 64.1±9.3 years) were included in the first and second surveys, respectively. In the first survey, after multivariable analysis, no association was found between VMS use and FSS: adjusted mean±sem 3.04±0.13 vs. 2.82±0.03 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.083, while users scored higher in the CFS: 6.17±0.22 vs. 5.72±0.06 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.048. In the second survey, no association was found between VMS use and FSS (2.83±0.19 vs. 2.84±0.03, p=0.952) and CFS (5.38±0.33 vs. 5.61±0.06, p=0.504). In the first survey, VMDS users scored higher in both FSS (3.03±0.06 vs. 2.76±0.04, p<0.001) and CFS (6.19±0.11 vs. 5.58±0.06, p<0.001) while no differences were found in the second survey in both FSS (2.93±0.07 vs. 2.81±0.04, p=0.161) and CFS (5.78±0.12 vs. 5.54±0.07, p=0.088) CONCLUSION: In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors found no consistent association between VMS consumption and fatigue. Participants taking VMDS tended to present with higher fatigue scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信