卡培他滨和奥沙利铂与卡培他滨治疗病理分期为N2的直肠癌的术后化放疗对比。

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ning Li, Yuan Zhu, Luying Liu, Yanru Feng, Wenling Wang, Jun Wang, Hao Wang, Gaofeng Li, Yuan Tang, Chen Hu, Wenyang Liu, Hua Ren, Shulian Wang, Weihu Wang, Yongwen Song, Yueping Liu, Hui Fang, Yu Tang, Ningning Lu, Bo Chen, Shunan Qi, Yexiong Li, Jing Jin
{"title":"卡培他滨和奥沙利铂与卡培他滨治疗病理分期为N2的直肠癌的术后化放疗对比。","authors":"Ning Li, Yuan Zhu, Luying Liu, Yanru Feng, Wenling Wang, Jun Wang, Hao Wang, Gaofeng Li, Yuan Tang, Chen Hu, Wenyang Liu, Hua Ren, Shulian Wang, Weihu Wang, Yongwen Song, Yueping Liu, Hui Fang, Yu Tang, Ningning Lu, Bo Chen, Shunan Qi, Yexiong Li, Jing Jin","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.05.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several studies have been conducted on the effects and toxicity of adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens as significantly increasing the toxic response without benefit to survival. In this study, we further explored the role of these two postoperative CRT regimens in patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial. A total of 180 patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer were eligible, 85 received capecitabine with radiotherapy (RT), and 95 received capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT. Patients in both groups received adjuvant chemotherapy [capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX); or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)] after CRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 59.2 [interquartile range (IQR), 34.0-96.8] months, the three-year disease- free survival (DFS) was 53.3% and 64.9% in the control group and the experimental group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.41-0.98; P=0.04]. There was no significant difference between the groups in overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.05; P=0.07), the incidence of locoregional recurrence (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.24-1.64; P=0.33), the incidence of distant metastasis (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-1.06; P=0.09) and grade 3-4 acute toxicities (P=0.78). For patients with survival longer than 3 years, the conditional overall survival (COS) was significantly better in the experimental group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96; P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that adding oxaliplatin to capecitabine-based postoperative CRT is safe and effective in patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"36 5","pages":"577-586"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin <i>vs.</i> capecitabine for pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Li, Yuan Zhu, Luying Liu, Yanru Feng, Wenling Wang, Jun Wang, Hao Wang, Gaofeng Li, Yuan Tang, Chen Hu, Wenyang Liu, Hua Ren, Shulian Wang, Weihu Wang, Yongwen Song, Yueping Liu, Hui Fang, Yu Tang, Ningning Lu, Bo Chen, Shunan Qi, Yexiong Li, Jing Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.05.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several studies have been conducted on the effects and toxicity of adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens as significantly increasing the toxic response without benefit to survival. In this study, we further explored the role of these two postoperative CRT regimens in patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial. A total of 180 patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer were eligible, 85 received capecitabine with radiotherapy (RT), and 95 received capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT. Patients in both groups received adjuvant chemotherapy [capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX); or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)] after CRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 59.2 [interquartile range (IQR), 34.0-96.8] months, the three-year disease- free survival (DFS) was 53.3% and 64.9% in the control group and the experimental group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.41-0.98; P=0.04]. There was no significant difference between the groups in overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.05; P=0.07), the incidence of locoregional recurrence (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.24-1.64; P=0.33), the incidence of distant metastasis (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-1.06; P=0.09) and grade 3-4 acute toxicities (P=0.78). For patients with survival longer than 3 years, the conditional overall survival (COS) was significantly better in the experimental group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96; P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that adding oxaliplatin to capecitabine-based postoperative CRT is safe and effective in patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"577-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.05.09\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.05.09","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的已有多项研究表明,在以氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨为基础的化放疗(CRT)方案中加入奥沙利铂会显著增加毒性反应,但对生存无益。在本研究中,我们进一步探讨了这两种术后 CRT 方案在病理分期为 N2 期直肠癌患者中的作用:本研究是一项随机临床试验的亚组分析。共有180名病理分期为N2的直肠癌患者符合条件,其中85人接受了卡培他滨联合放疗(RT),95人接受了卡培他滨和奥沙利铂联合放疗。两组患者均在CRT后接受辅助化疗[卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(XELOX);或氟尿嘧啶、亮菌素和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)]:中位随访时间为59.2个月[四分位距(IQR),34.0-96.8],对照组和实验组的三年无病生存率(DFS)分别为53.3%和64.9%[危险比(HR),0.63;95%置信区间(95% CI),0.41-0.98;P=0.04]。两组在总生存期(OS)(HR,0.62;95% CI,0.37-1.05;P=0.07)、局部复发率(HR,0.62;95% CI,0.24-1.64;P=0.33)、远处转移发生率(HR,0.67;95% CI,0.42-1.06;P=0.09)和 3-4 级急性毒性(P=0.78)方面无明显差异。对于生存期超过3年的患者,实验组的条件总生存期(COS)明显更好(HR,0.39;95% CI,0.16-0.96;P=0.03):我们的研究结果表明,在以卡培他滨为基础的术后 CRT 中加入奥沙利铂对病理分期为 N2 期的直肠癌患者是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin vs. capecitabine for pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.

Objective: Several studies have been conducted on the effects and toxicity of adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens as significantly increasing the toxic response without benefit to survival. In this study, we further explored the role of these two postoperative CRT regimens in patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.

Methods: This study was a subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial. A total of 180 patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer were eligible, 85 received capecitabine with radiotherapy (RT), and 95 received capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT. Patients in both groups received adjuvant chemotherapy [capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX); or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)] after CRT.

Results: At a median follow-up of 59.2 [interquartile range (IQR), 34.0-96.8] months, the three-year disease- free survival (DFS) was 53.3% and 64.9% in the control group and the experimental group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.41-0.98; P=0.04]. There was no significant difference between the groups in overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.05; P=0.07), the incidence of locoregional recurrence (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.24-1.64; P=0.33), the incidence of distant metastasis (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-1.06; P=0.09) and grade 3-4 acute toxicities (P=0.78). For patients with survival longer than 3 years, the conditional overall survival (COS) was significantly better in the experimental group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96; P=0.03).

Conclusions: Our results indicated that adding oxaliplatin to capecitabine-based postoperative CRT is safe and effective in patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
1726
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013. CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信