Ayesha Chowdhury, Rong Tian, Paul McIlhiney, Dona M P Jayakody
{"title":"老年土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民在听力损失和听力服务方面的经历:范围审查》。","authors":"Ayesha Chowdhury, Rong Tian, Paul McIlhiney, Dona M P Jayakody","doi":"10.1111/coa.14254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Australia, older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have the highest prevalence of hearing loss, for which dedicated audiological services are available. However, there is limited research on the experiences older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have with hearing loss and audiological services. Therefore, this study aimed to consolidate existing literature with a scoping review, specifically on the above to identify gaps and guide future research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten databases, including electronic journal databases and government databases, were systematically searched. Additional studies were sought from article reference lists, review articles, conference abstracts and Google Scholar. We identified 540 records and 22 of them met our inclusion criteria. Our inclusion criteria constituted research of any design on the experiences of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (aged 45+ years) with hearing loss and audiological services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies reported on experiences with hearing loss, four studies reported on experiences with audiological services and one study reported on both experiences. Prevalence of hearing loss was estimated to be 20%-34% in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; a discrepancy between self-reported and objective hearing difficulties was also identified. Audiological services currently available to older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were also underutilised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research on older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is required to uncover: (1) the reasons for underreported hearing loss; (2) types of hearing loss experienced; (3) barriers to accessing audiological services; and (4) best hearing-loss management and rehabilitation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People's Experiences With Hearing Loss and Audiological Services: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ayesha Chowdhury, Rong Tian, Paul McIlhiney, Dona M P Jayakody\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Australia, older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have the highest prevalence of hearing loss, for which dedicated audiological services are available. However, there is limited research on the experiences older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have with hearing loss and audiological services. Therefore, this study aimed to consolidate existing literature with a scoping review, specifically on the above to identify gaps and guide future research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten databases, including electronic journal databases and government databases, were systematically searched. Additional studies were sought from article reference lists, review articles, conference abstracts and Google Scholar. We identified 540 records and 22 of them met our inclusion criteria. Our inclusion criteria constituted research of any design on the experiences of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (aged 45+ years) with hearing loss and audiological services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies reported on experiences with hearing loss, four studies reported on experiences with audiological services and one study reported on both experiences. Prevalence of hearing loss was estimated to be 20%-34% in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; a discrepancy between self-reported and objective hearing difficulties was also identified. Audiological services currently available to older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were also underutilised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research on older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is required to uncover: (1) the reasons for underreported hearing loss; (2) types of hearing loss experienced; (3) barriers to accessing audiological services; and (4) best hearing-loss management and rehabilitation practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People's Experiences With Hearing Loss and Audiological Services: A Scoping Review.
Introduction: In Australia, older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have the highest prevalence of hearing loss, for which dedicated audiological services are available. However, there is limited research on the experiences older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have with hearing loss and audiological services. Therefore, this study aimed to consolidate existing literature with a scoping review, specifically on the above to identify gaps and guide future research.
Method: Ten databases, including electronic journal databases and government databases, were systematically searched. Additional studies were sought from article reference lists, review articles, conference abstracts and Google Scholar. We identified 540 records and 22 of them met our inclusion criteria. Our inclusion criteria constituted research of any design on the experiences of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (aged 45+ years) with hearing loss and audiological services.
Results: Seventeen studies reported on experiences with hearing loss, four studies reported on experiences with audiological services and one study reported on both experiences. Prevalence of hearing loss was estimated to be 20%-34% in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; a discrepancy between self-reported and objective hearing difficulties was also identified. Audiological services currently available to older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were also underutilised.
Conclusions: Future research on older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is required to uncover: (1) the reasons for underreported hearing loss; (2) types of hearing loss experienced; (3) barriers to accessing audiological services; and (4) best hearing-loss management and rehabilitation practices.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.