{"title":"针对哮喘患儿的指南推荐临床活动的实施和效果:基于人群的队列。","authors":"Zainab Khalaf, Sejal Saglani, Chloe I Bloom","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines advise minimizing asthma exacerbation risk, which is achieved partially through good clinical practice activities, including scheduled asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans. We assessed how frequently these activities are provided and how effective they are in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do guideline-recommended activities such as asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans prevent asthma exacerbations?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review used United Kingdom primary care medical records between 2004 and 2021, linked to hospital records. Children were eligible from asthma diagnosis until age 16 years. Annual implementation of asthma review, inhaler technique check, and asthma management plan was measured. Risk factors for these activities not being undertaken were determined by using multivariable logistic regression. Self-controlled case series was adopted to assess the effectiveness of each activity over 12 months; this was divided into two 6-month periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126,483 children were eligible; 30% to 45% received each annual activity, and 8% received all three together. Risk factors for not receiving activities included younger age, more socioeconomic deprivation, and higher or no BMI measurement. Management plans and asthma reviews, as standalone activities, were associated with an approximately 15% exacerbation reduction over 12 months and 8% over 6 months, respectively (asthma management plan, n = 4,624; 0-180 days [incidence rate ratio (95% CI)]: 0.87 [0.79-0.96]; 181-365 days: 0.83 [0.73-0.95]; asthma review, n = 6,948; 0-180 days: 0.92 [0.85-0.99]; 181-365 days: 0.93 [0.83-1.03]). Standalone inhaler technique checks were not associated with exacerbations. Provision of all activities together was associated with an approximately 30% exacerbation reduction over 12 months (n = 3,643; 0-180 days: incidence rate ratio, 0.76 [0.68-0.85]; 181-365 days: incidence rate ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.81]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results indicate that most children in the United Kingdom do not receive the guideline-recommended activities to monitor their asthma. This study suggests that these activities, if implemented, are effective in clinical practice and maximally effective when combined in the same visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"665-674"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Effectiveness of Guideline-Recommended Clinical Activities for Children With Asthma: Population-Based Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Khalaf, Sejal Saglani, Chloe I Bloom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines advise minimizing asthma exacerbation risk, which is achieved partially through good clinical practice activities, including scheduled asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans. We assessed how frequently these activities are provided and how effective they are in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do guideline-recommended activities such as asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans prevent asthma exacerbations?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review used United Kingdom primary care medical records between 2004 and 2021, linked to hospital records. Children were eligible from asthma diagnosis until age 16 years. Annual implementation of asthma review, inhaler technique check, and asthma management plan was measured. Risk factors for these activities not being undertaken were determined by using multivariable logistic regression. Self-controlled case series was adopted to assess the effectiveness of each activity over 12 months; this was divided into two 6-month periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126,483 children were eligible; 30% to 45% received each annual activity, and 8% received all three together. Risk factors for not receiving activities included younger age, more socioeconomic deprivation, and higher or no BMI measurement. Management plans and asthma reviews, as standalone activities, were associated with an approximately 15% exacerbation reduction over 12 months and 8% over 6 months, respectively (asthma management plan, n = 4,624; 0-180 days [incidence rate ratio (95% CI)]: 0.87 [0.79-0.96]; 181-365 days: 0.83 [0.73-0.95]; asthma review, n = 6,948; 0-180 days: 0.92 [0.85-0.99]; 181-365 days: 0.93 [0.83-1.03]). Standalone inhaler technique checks were not associated with exacerbations. Provision of all activities together was associated with an approximately 30% exacerbation reduction over 12 months (n = 3,643; 0-180 days: incidence rate ratio, 0.76 [0.68-0.85]; 181-365 days: incidence rate ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.81]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results indicate that most children in the United Kingdom do not receive the guideline-recommended activities to monitor their asthma. This study suggests that these activities, if implemented, are effective in clinical practice and maximally effective when combined in the same visit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"665-674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882771/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation and Effectiveness of Guideline-Recommended Clinical Activities for Children With Asthma: Population-Based Cohort.
Background: Guidelines advise minimizing asthma exacerbation risk, which is achieved partially through good clinical practice activities, including scheduled asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans. We assessed how frequently these activities are provided and how effective they are in clinical practice.
Research question: Do guideline-recommended activities such as asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans prevent asthma exacerbations?
Study design and methods: This retrospective chart review used United Kingdom primary care medical records between 2004 and 2021, linked to hospital records. Children were eligible from asthma diagnosis until age 16 years. Annual implementation of asthma review, inhaler technique check, and asthma management plan was measured. Risk factors for these activities not being undertaken were determined by using multivariable logistic regression. Self-controlled case series was adopted to assess the effectiveness of each activity over 12 months; this was divided into two 6-month periods.
Results: A total of 126,483 children were eligible; 30% to 45% received each annual activity, and 8% received all three together. Risk factors for not receiving activities included younger age, more socioeconomic deprivation, and higher or no BMI measurement. Management plans and asthma reviews, as standalone activities, were associated with an approximately 15% exacerbation reduction over 12 months and 8% over 6 months, respectively (asthma management plan, n = 4,624; 0-180 days [incidence rate ratio (95% CI)]: 0.87 [0.79-0.96]; 181-365 days: 0.83 [0.73-0.95]; asthma review, n = 6,948; 0-180 days: 0.92 [0.85-0.99]; 181-365 days: 0.93 [0.83-1.03]). Standalone inhaler technique checks were not associated with exacerbations. Provision of all activities together was associated with an approximately 30% exacerbation reduction over 12 months (n = 3,643; 0-180 days: incidence rate ratio, 0.76 [0.68-0.85]; 181-365 days: incidence rate ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.81]).
Interpretation: Our results indicate that most children in the United Kingdom do not receive the guideline-recommended activities to monitor their asthma. This study suggests that these activities, if implemented, are effective in clinical practice and maximally effective when combined in the same visit.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.