针对哮喘患儿的指南推荐临床活动的实施和效果:基于人群的队列。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036
Z Khalaf, S Saglani, C I Bloom
{"title":"针对哮喘患儿的指南推荐临床活动的实施和效果:基于人群的队列。","authors":"Z Khalaf, S Saglani, C I Bloom","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines advise minimising asthma exacerbation risk is achieved partially through good clinical practice activities, including scheduled asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks and asthma management plans. We assessed how frequently these activities are provided and how effective they are in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do guidelines-recommended activities such as asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks and asthma management plans prevent asthma exacerbations STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review using UK primary-care medical records between 2004-2021, linked to hospital records. Children were eligible from asthma diagnosis until aged 16 years. Annual implementation of asthma review, inhaler technique check, management plan was measured. Risk factors for them not being undertaken were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Self-controlled case series (SCCS) was adopted to assess the effectiveness of each activity over 12-months; this was divided into two 6-month periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>126,483 children were eligible; 30-45% received each annual activity, 8% received all three together. Risk factors for not receiving activities included younger age, more socioeconomic deprivation, higher or no BMI measurement. Management plans and asthma reviews, as standalone activities, were associated with approximately 15% exacerbation reduction over 12-months and 8% over 6-months, respectively (management plan, N=4,624; 0-6 months (IRR, 95%CI): 0.87, 0.79-0.96; 6-12 months: 0.83, 0.73-0.95; asthma review, N=6,948; 0-6 months: 0.92, 0.85-0.99; 6-12 months: 0.93, 0.83-1.03). Standalone inhaler technique checks were not associated with exacerbations. Provision of all activities together was associated with approximately 30% exacerbation reduction over 12-months (N=3,643, 0-6 months: 0.76, 0.68-0.85; 6-12 months: 0.69, 0.60-0.81).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Most UK children do not receive the guideline-recommended activities to monitor their asthma. This study suggests, if implemented, they are effective in clinical practice and maximally effective when combined in the same visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and effectiveness of guideline-recommended clinical activities for children with asthma: population-based cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Z Khalaf, S Saglani, C I Bloom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines advise minimising asthma exacerbation risk is achieved partially through good clinical practice activities, including scheduled asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks and asthma management plans. We assessed how frequently these activities are provided and how effective they are in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do guidelines-recommended activities such as asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks and asthma management plans prevent asthma exacerbations STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review using UK primary-care medical records between 2004-2021, linked to hospital records. Children were eligible from asthma diagnosis until aged 16 years. Annual implementation of asthma review, inhaler technique check, management plan was measured. Risk factors for them not being undertaken were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Self-controlled case series (SCCS) was adopted to assess the effectiveness of each activity over 12-months; this was divided into two 6-month periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>126,483 children were eligible; 30-45% received each annual activity, 8% received all three together. Risk factors for not receiving activities included younger age, more socioeconomic deprivation, higher or no BMI measurement. Management plans and asthma reviews, as standalone activities, were associated with approximately 15% exacerbation reduction over 12-months and 8% over 6-months, respectively (management plan, N=4,624; 0-6 months (IRR, 95%CI): 0.87, 0.79-0.96; 6-12 months: 0.83, 0.73-0.95; asthma review, N=6,948; 0-6 months: 0.92, 0.85-0.99; 6-12 months: 0.93, 0.83-1.03). Standalone inhaler technique checks were not associated with exacerbations. Provision of all activities together was associated with approximately 30% exacerbation reduction over 12-months (N=3,643, 0-6 months: 0.76, 0.68-0.85; 6-12 months: 0.69, 0.60-0.81).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Most UK children do not receive the guideline-recommended activities to monitor their asthma. This study suggests, if implemented, they are effective in clinical practice and maximally effective when combined in the same visit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:指南建议通过良好的临床实践活动(包括定期哮喘复查、吸入器技术检查和哮喘管理计划)将哮喘恶化风险降至最低。我们评估了这些活动的开展频率以及在临床实践中的效果:研究设计和方法:这是一项回顾性病历审查,使用的是 2004-2021 年间英国初级保健医疗记录,并与医院记录相链接。从哮喘确诊到 16 岁的儿童均符合条件。对哮喘复查、吸入器技术检查和管理计划的年度实施情况进行了测量。采用多变量逻辑回归法确定未实施这些计划的风险因素。采用自我控制病例系列(SCCS)来评估每项活动在 12 个月内的效果;这一期间分为两个 6 个月:126483名儿童符合条件;30%-45%的儿童参加了每项年度活动,8%的儿童同时参加了三项活动。未参加活动的风险因素包括年龄较小、社会经济条件较差、体重指数较高或未测量体重指数。管理计划和哮喘复查作为独立的活动,分别与 12 个月和 6 个月内约 15%和 8%的病情恶化减少率相关(管理计划,N=4,624;0-6 个月(IRR,95%CI):0.87,0.79-0.96;6-12 个月:0.83,0.73-0.96):0.83,0.73-0.95;哮喘复查,N=6948;0-6 个月:0.92, 0.85-0.99; 6-12 months:0.93, 0.83-1.03).单独的吸入器技术检查与病情恶化无关。在 12 个月内,同时开展所有活动可减少约 30% 的病情加重(N=3643,0-6 个月:0.76,0.68-0.85;6-12 个月:0.69,0.60-0.81):大多数英国儿童没有接受指南建议的哮喘监测活动。这项研究表明,如果实施了这些活动,它们在临床实践中是有效的,而且在同一次就诊中结合使用可发挥最大效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and effectiveness of guideline-recommended clinical activities for children with asthma: population-based cohort.

Background: Guidelines advise minimising asthma exacerbation risk is achieved partially through good clinical practice activities, including scheduled asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks and asthma management plans. We assessed how frequently these activities are provided and how effective they are in clinical practice.

Research question: Do guidelines-recommended activities such as asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks and asthma management plans prevent asthma exacerbations STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review using UK primary-care medical records between 2004-2021, linked to hospital records. Children were eligible from asthma diagnosis until aged 16 years. Annual implementation of asthma review, inhaler technique check, management plan was measured. Risk factors for them not being undertaken were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Self-controlled case series (SCCS) was adopted to assess the effectiveness of each activity over 12-months; this was divided into two 6-month periods.

Results: 126,483 children were eligible; 30-45% received each annual activity, 8% received all three together. Risk factors for not receiving activities included younger age, more socioeconomic deprivation, higher or no BMI measurement. Management plans and asthma reviews, as standalone activities, were associated with approximately 15% exacerbation reduction over 12-months and 8% over 6-months, respectively (management plan, N=4,624; 0-6 months (IRR, 95%CI): 0.87, 0.79-0.96; 6-12 months: 0.83, 0.73-0.95; asthma review, N=6,948; 0-6 months: 0.92, 0.85-0.99; 6-12 months: 0.93, 0.83-1.03). Standalone inhaler technique checks were not associated with exacerbations. Provision of all activities together was associated with approximately 30% exacerbation reduction over 12-months (N=3,643, 0-6 months: 0.76, 0.68-0.85; 6-12 months: 0.69, 0.60-0.81).

Interpretation: Most UK children do not receive the guideline-recommended activities to monitor their asthma. This study suggests, if implemented, they are effective in clinical practice and maximally effective when combined in the same visit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信