重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者使用 Hydra 自扩张经导管主动脉瓣的三年临床和血流动力学评估。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Vilhelmas Bajoras, Maciej Dabrowski, Giedrius Davidavicius, Sigitas Cesna, Dovile Peciuraite, Joanna J Wykrzykowska, Adam Witkowski, Patrycjusz Stoklosa, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Audrius Aidietis
{"title":"重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者使用 Hydra 自扩张经导管主动脉瓣的三年临床和血流动力学评估。","authors":"Vilhelmas Bajoras, Maciej Dabrowski, Giedrius Davidavicius, Sigitas Cesna, Dovile Peciuraite, Joanna J Wykrzykowska, Adam Witkowski, Patrycjusz Stoklosa, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Audrius Aidietis","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Hydra CE study revealed 1-year favorable efficacy of TAVR, showing a large effective orifice area (EOA), low gradient, and acceptable complication rates.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We evaluated the 3-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of Hydra self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve (manufactured by Vascular Innovations Co Ltd, Nonthaburi, Thailand; a subsidiary of Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited, India) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at high or extremely high surgical risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hydra CE study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. A total of 157 patients were enrolled in the study, out of whom 54 patients from two centers (Lithuania and Poland) had provided consent for long-term follow-up at recruitment, with a planned 5-year follow-up period. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and patients were followed up for up to 3 years, with an assessment of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 54 patients, the average age was 81.0 ± 4.1 years. The mean STS score was 3.2 ± 2.0%. At 3 years, all-cause mortality had occurred in 14.8% of patients, including 3.7% cardiovascular deaths and 1.9% device-related deaths. There was a progressive enhancement in EOA that is, 0.68 ± 0.15 cm<sup>2</sup> at baseline to 1.97 ± 0.52 cm<sup>2</sup> at 3 years (p < 0.001) as well as significant improvement in the mean aortic valve gradient that is, 53.4 ± 14.24 mmHg at baseline to 8.6 ± 2.80 mmHg at 3 years (p < 0.001). New permanent pacemaker implantation rates up to 3-year follow-up was 12.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3-year results of the Hydra CE study demonstrated consistent improvements in hemodynamics over time. The study also revealed favorable safety and efficacy trends, along with low occurrences of new permanent pacemaker implantations and paravalvular leaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Year Clinical and Hemodynamic Evaluation of the Hydra Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Vilhelmas Bajoras, Maciej Dabrowski, Giedrius Davidavicius, Sigitas Cesna, Dovile Peciuraite, Joanna J Wykrzykowska, Adam Witkowski, Patrycjusz Stoklosa, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Audrius Aidietis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Hydra CE study revealed 1-year favorable efficacy of TAVR, showing a large effective orifice area (EOA), low gradient, and acceptable complication rates.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We evaluated the 3-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of Hydra self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve (manufactured by Vascular Innovations Co Ltd, Nonthaburi, Thailand; a subsidiary of Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited, India) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at high or extremely high surgical risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hydra CE study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. A total of 157 patients were enrolled in the study, out of whom 54 patients from two centers (Lithuania and Poland) had provided consent for long-term follow-up at recruitment, with a planned 5-year follow-up period. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and patients were followed up for up to 3 years, with an assessment of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 54 patients, the average age was 81.0 ± 4.1 years. The mean STS score was 3.2 ± 2.0%. At 3 years, all-cause mortality had occurred in 14.8% of patients, including 3.7% cardiovascular deaths and 1.9% device-related deaths. There was a progressive enhancement in EOA that is, 0.68 ± 0.15 cm<sup>2</sup> at baseline to 1.97 ± 0.52 cm<sup>2</sup> at 3 years (p < 0.001) as well as significant improvement in the mean aortic valve gradient that is, 53.4 ± 14.24 mmHg at baseline to 8.6 ± 2.80 mmHg at 3 years (p < 0.001). New permanent pacemaker implantation rates up to 3-year follow-up was 12.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3-year results of the Hydra CE study demonstrated consistent improvements in hemodynamics over time. The study also revealed favorable safety and efficacy trends, along with low occurrences of new permanent pacemaker implantations and paravalvular leaks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31285\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:我们评估了Hydra自扩张经导管主动脉瓣(由Vascular Innovations Co Ltd生产,泰国暖武里府;印度Sahajanand医疗技术有限公司的子公司)在高手术风险或极高手术风险的无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的3年临床和血流动力学结果:Hydra CE 研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂研究。共有 157 名患者参与了该研究,其中来自两个中心(立陶宛和波兰)的 54 名患者在招募时已同意接受长期随访,计划随访 5 年。主要终点是全因死亡率,对患者进行长达3年的随访,评估临床和超声心动图结果:结果:54 名患者的平均年龄为 81.0 ± 4.1 岁。平均 STS 得分为 3.2 ± 2.0%。3年后,14.8%的患者全因死亡,包括3.7%的心血管死亡和1.9%的器械相关死亡。EOA逐渐增加,从基线时的0.68 ± 0.15平方厘米增加到3年后的1.97 ± 0.52平方厘米(p 结论:EOA的增加是一个渐进的过程:Hydra CE 研究的 3 年结果表明,随着时间的推移,血液动力学得到了持续改善。该研究还显示了良好的安全性和有效性趋势,以及较低的新永久起搏器植入和瓣膜旁漏发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three-Year Clinical and Hemodynamic Evaluation of the Hydra Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Background: The Hydra CE study revealed 1-year favorable efficacy of TAVR, showing a large effective orifice area (EOA), low gradient, and acceptable complication rates.

Aims: We evaluated the 3-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of Hydra self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve (manufactured by Vascular Innovations Co Ltd, Nonthaburi, Thailand; a subsidiary of Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited, India) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at high or extremely high surgical risk.

Methods: The Hydra CE study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. A total of 157 patients were enrolled in the study, out of whom 54 patients from two centers (Lithuania and Poland) had provided consent for long-term follow-up at recruitment, with a planned 5-year follow-up period. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and patients were followed up for up to 3 years, with an assessment of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.

Results: Among the 54 patients, the average age was 81.0 ± 4.1 years. The mean STS score was 3.2 ± 2.0%. At 3 years, all-cause mortality had occurred in 14.8% of patients, including 3.7% cardiovascular deaths and 1.9% device-related deaths. There was a progressive enhancement in EOA that is, 0.68 ± 0.15 cm2 at baseline to 1.97 ± 0.52 cm2 at 3 years (p < 0.001) as well as significant improvement in the mean aortic valve gradient that is, 53.4 ± 14.24 mmHg at baseline to 8.6 ± 2.80 mmHg at 3 years (p < 0.001). New permanent pacemaker implantation rates up to 3-year follow-up was 12.9%.

Conclusion: The 3-year results of the Hydra CE study demonstrated consistent improvements in hemodynamics over time. The study also revealed favorable safety and efficacy trends, along with low occurrences of new permanent pacemaker implantations and paravalvular leaks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信