川崎病后巨大冠状动脉瘤患儿的管理和治疗差异。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mia Chen, Audrey Dionne, Nadine F Choueiter, Ashraf S Harahsheh, Seda Tierney, Iñaki Navarro Castellanos, Nagib Dahdah
{"title":"川崎病后巨大冠状动脉瘤患儿的管理和治疗差异。","authors":"Mia Chen, Audrey Dionne, Nadine F Choueiter, Ashraf S Harahsheh, Seda Tierney, Iñaki Navarro Castellanos, Nagib Dahdah","doi":"10.1017/S1047951124026829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Giant coronary artery aneurysms are rare but potentially fatal complications of Kawasaki disease. The lack of evidence-based recommendations on their management and treatment cause guidelines and practices to differ. We aimed to assess these variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey regarding surveillance, imaging, pharmacological management, and interventional practices was distributed among 134 physicians attending to Kawasaki disease patients worldwide. A p-value of <0.05 was deemed significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (60%) of respondents were general paediatric cardiologists, and 29% interventional specialists. The average years in practice was 15 ± 9.6. Physicians from Asia had the most experience with giant coronary artery aneurysms. American practitioners preferred combining anticoagulants with aspirin. Beta-blockers and statins were more likely used in teenagers versus younger children. Cardiac catheterisation was most (52%) chosen for coronary surveillance in patients with echocardiogram anomalies, followed by Coronary CT-angiography. The indications for coronary intervention were split among respondents, regardless of geographic region or experience. The preferred treatment of coronary stenosis was percutaneous intervention (69%) versus bypass surgery. For thrombosis, thrombolytics (50%) were preferred over percutaneous (39%) and surgical (11%) interventions. Most (92%) preferred intervening in young children in a paediatric facility but were split between a paediatric and adult facility for older children. Most chose combined management by adult and paediatric specialists for either age-scenarios (70, 82%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As identified by our study, the lack of large studies and evidence-based recommendations cause uncertainty and ambivalence towards certain treatments. International collaborative efforts are needed to provide more robust evidence in the management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in the management and treatment of children with giant coronary artery aneurysm following Kawasaki disease.\",\"authors\":\"Mia Chen, Audrey Dionne, Nadine F Choueiter, Ashraf S Harahsheh, Seda Tierney, Iñaki Navarro Castellanos, Nagib Dahdah\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1047951124026829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Giant coronary artery aneurysms are rare but potentially fatal complications of Kawasaki disease. The lack of evidence-based recommendations on their management and treatment cause guidelines and practices to differ. We aimed to assess these variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey regarding surveillance, imaging, pharmacological management, and interventional practices was distributed among 134 physicians attending to Kawasaki disease patients worldwide. A p-value of <0.05 was deemed significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (60%) of respondents were general paediatric cardiologists, and 29% interventional specialists. The average years in practice was 15 ± 9.6. Physicians from Asia had the most experience with giant coronary artery aneurysms. American practitioners preferred combining anticoagulants with aspirin. Beta-blockers and statins were more likely used in teenagers versus younger children. Cardiac catheterisation was most (52%) chosen for coronary surveillance in patients with echocardiogram anomalies, followed by Coronary CT-angiography. The indications for coronary intervention were split among respondents, regardless of geographic region or experience. The preferred treatment of coronary stenosis was percutaneous intervention (69%) versus bypass surgery. For thrombosis, thrombolytics (50%) were preferred over percutaneous (39%) and surgical (11%) interventions. Most (92%) preferred intervening in young children in a paediatric facility but were split between a paediatric and adult facility for older children. Most chose combined management by adult and paediatric specialists for either age-scenarios (70, 82%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As identified by our study, the lack of large studies and evidence-based recommendations cause uncertainty and ambivalence towards certain treatments. International collaborative efforts are needed to provide more robust evidence in the management of these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951124026829\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951124026829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:巨大冠状动脉瘤是川崎病罕见但可能致命的并发症。由于缺乏有关其管理和治疗的循证建议,导致指南和实践各不相同。我们旨在评估这些差异:我们向全球 134 名川崎病患者的主治医生发放了一份匿名在线调查,内容涉及监测、成像、药物管理和介入治疗方法。调查结果显示大多数受访者(60%)是普通儿科心脏病专家,29%是介入专家。平均从业年限为 15 ± 9.6 年。亚洲医生在处理巨大冠状动脉瘤方面经验最丰富。美国医生喜欢将抗凝剂与阿司匹林结合使用。相对于年龄较小的儿童,青少年更倾向于使用β-受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物。在对超声心动图异常的患者进行冠状动脉监测时,大多数人(52%)选择心导管检查,其次是冠状动脉 CT 血管造影。受访者对冠状动脉介入治疗适应症的选择各不相同,与地理区域或经验无关。冠状动脉狭窄的首选治疗方法是经皮介入治疗(69%)和搭桥手术。对于血栓形成,首选溶栓药物(50%)而非经皮(39%)和手术(11%)干预。大多数人(92%)倾向于在儿科机构对幼儿进行干预,但对于年龄较大的儿童,他们则倾向于在儿科和成人机构进行干预。大多数人选择由成人和儿科专家对任一年龄段的儿童进行联合治疗(70%,82%):正如我们的研究发现的那样,缺乏大型研究和循证建议导致了对某些治疗方法的不确定性和矛盾心理。需要开展国际合作,为这些患者的治疗提供更有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in the management and treatment of children with giant coronary artery aneurysm following Kawasaki disease.

Objectives: Giant coronary artery aneurysms are rare but potentially fatal complications of Kawasaki disease. The lack of evidence-based recommendations on their management and treatment cause guidelines and practices to differ. We aimed to assess these variations.

Methods: An anonymous online survey regarding surveillance, imaging, pharmacological management, and interventional practices was distributed among 134 physicians attending to Kawasaki disease patients worldwide. A p-value of <0.05 was deemed significant.

Results: The majority (60%) of respondents were general paediatric cardiologists, and 29% interventional specialists. The average years in practice was 15 ± 9.6. Physicians from Asia had the most experience with giant coronary artery aneurysms. American practitioners preferred combining anticoagulants with aspirin. Beta-blockers and statins were more likely used in teenagers versus younger children. Cardiac catheterisation was most (52%) chosen for coronary surveillance in patients with echocardiogram anomalies, followed by Coronary CT-angiography. The indications for coronary intervention were split among respondents, regardless of geographic region or experience. The preferred treatment of coronary stenosis was percutaneous intervention (69%) versus bypass surgery. For thrombosis, thrombolytics (50%) were preferred over percutaneous (39%) and surgical (11%) interventions. Most (92%) preferred intervening in young children in a paediatric facility but were split between a paediatric and adult facility for older children. Most chose combined management by adult and paediatric specialists for either age-scenarios (70, 82%).

Conclusion: As identified by our study, the lack of large studies and evidence-based recommendations cause uncertainty and ambivalence towards certain treatments. International collaborative efforts are needed to provide more robust evidence in the management of these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信