Caroline Dos Santos Costa, Andrea Wendt, Adriana Kramer Fiala Machado, Luiza Isnardi Cardoso Ricardo, André de Oliveira Werneck, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada
{"title":"巴西青少年、成年人和老年人的超加工食品消费与屏幕时间有关。","authors":"Caroline Dos Santos Costa, Andrea Wendt, Adriana Kramer Fiala Machado, Luiza Isnardi Cardoso Ricardo, André de Oliveira Werneck, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada","doi":"10.1017/S0007114524002848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the association between screen time and ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption across the lifespan, using data from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey, a cross-sectional and population-based study. A score was used to evaluate UPF consumption, calculated by summing the positive answers to questions about the consumption of ten UPF subgroups on the previous day. Scores ≥5 represented high UPF consumption. Daily time spent engaging with television or other screens was self-reported. Crude and adjusted models were obtained through Poisson regression and results were expressed in prevalence ratios by age group. The sample included 2315 adolescents, 65 803 adults and 22 728 older adults. The prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 was higher according to increased screen time, with dose-response across all age groups and types of screen time. Adolescents, adults and older adults watching television for ≥6 h/d presented prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 1·8 (95 % CI 1·2, 2·9), 1·9 (95 % CI 1·6, 2·3) and 2·2 (95 % CI 1·4, 3·6) times higher, respectively, compared with those who did not watch television. For other screens, the prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 was 2·4 (95 % CI 1·3, 4·1) and 1·6 (95 % CI 1·4, 1·9) times higher for adolescents and adults using screens for ≥ 6 h/d, respectively, while for older adults, only screen times of 2 to < 3 and 3 to < 6 h were significantly associated with UPF scores ≥5. Screen time was associated with high consumption of UPF in all age groups. Considering these associations when planning and implementing interventions would be beneficial for public health across the lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultra-processed food consumption is related to screen time among Brazilian adolescents, adults and older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Dos Santos Costa, Andrea Wendt, Adriana Kramer Fiala Machado, Luiza Isnardi Cardoso Ricardo, André de Oliveira Werneck, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0007114524002848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the association between screen time and ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption across the lifespan, using data from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey, a cross-sectional and population-based study. A score was used to evaluate UPF consumption, calculated by summing the positive answers to questions about the consumption of ten UPF subgroups on the previous day. Scores ≥5 represented high UPF consumption. Daily time spent engaging with television or other screens was self-reported. Crude and adjusted models were obtained through Poisson regression and results were expressed in prevalence ratios by age group. The sample included 2315 adolescents, 65 803 adults and 22 728 older adults. The prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 was higher according to increased screen time, with dose-response across all age groups and types of screen time. Adolescents, adults and older adults watching television for ≥6 h/d presented prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 1·8 (95 % CI 1·2, 2·9), 1·9 (95 % CI 1·6, 2·3) and 2·2 (95 % CI 1·4, 3·6) times higher, respectively, compared with those who did not watch television. For other screens, the prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 was 2·4 (95 % CI 1·3, 4·1) and 1·6 (95 % CI 1·4, 1·9) times higher for adolescents and adults using screens for ≥ 6 h/d, respectively, while for older adults, only screen times of 2 to < 3 and 3 to < 6 h were significantly associated with UPF scores ≥5. Screen time was associated with high consumption of UPF in all age groups. Considering these associations when planning and implementing interventions would be beneficial for public health across the lifespan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"118-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114524002848\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114524002848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在调查整个生命周期中屏幕时间与超加工食品消费(UPF)之间的关联。研究使用了2019年巴西全国健康调查的数据,这是一项基于人口的横断面研究。UPF消耗量采用分数进行评估,分数是对前一天10个UPF亚组消耗量问题的正面回答的总和。得分≥5 代表 UPF 消费量高。每天接触电视或其他屏幕的时间为自我报告。通过泊松回归得出粗略模型和调整模型,结果以各年龄组的患病率比率表示。样本包括 2315 名青少年、65803 名成年人和 22728 名老年人。屏幕时间越长,UPF 分数≥5 的流行率越高,在所有年龄组和屏幕时间类型中都存在剂量反应。与不看电视的人相比,每天看电视时间≥6 小时的青少年、成年人和老年人的 UPF 分数≥5 的流行率分别高出 1.8(95% CI 1.2-2.9)、1.9(95% CI 1.6-2.3)和 2.2(95% CI 1.4-3.6)倍。就其他屏幕而言,每天使用屏幕时间≥6 小时的青少年和成年人的 UPF 分数≥5 的流行率分别为 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.1) 和 1.6 (95% CI 1.4-1.9)倍,而就老年人而言,只有每天使用屏幕时间为 2- 6 小时的青少年和成年人的 UPF 分数≥5 的流行率高于每天使用屏幕时间≥6 小时的成年人。
Ultra-processed food consumption is related to screen time among Brazilian adolescents, adults and older adults.
This study investigated the association between screen time and ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption across the lifespan, using data from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey, a cross-sectional and population-based study. A score was used to evaluate UPF consumption, calculated by summing the positive answers to questions about the consumption of ten UPF subgroups on the previous day. Scores ≥5 represented high UPF consumption. Daily time spent engaging with television or other screens was self-reported. Crude and adjusted models were obtained through Poisson regression and results were expressed in prevalence ratios by age group. The sample included 2315 adolescents, 65 803 adults and 22 728 older adults. The prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 was higher according to increased screen time, with dose-response across all age groups and types of screen time. Adolescents, adults and older adults watching television for ≥6 h/d presented prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 1·8 (95 % CI 1·2, 2·9), 1·9 (95 % CI 1·6, 2·3) and 2·2 (95 % CI 1·4, 3·6) times higher, respectively, compared with those who did not watch television. For other screens, the prevalence of UPF scores ≥5 was 2·4 (95 % CI 1·3, 4·1) and 1·6 (95 % CI 1·4, 1·9) times higher for adolescents and adults using screens for ≥ 6 h/d, respectively, while for older adults, only screen times of 2 to < 3 and 3 to < 6 h were significantly associated with UPF scores ≥5. Screen time was associated with high consumption of UPF in all age groups. Considering these associations when planning and implementing interventions would be beneficial for public health across the lifespan.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.