谢菲尔德自适应模式电刺激疗法(SHAPES)治疗中风后手臂痉挛:三臂、部分盲法、随机对照试验的研究方案。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ali Ali, Avril D McCarthy, Mark Reeves, Jamie Healey, Louise Moody, Adewale Adebajo, Tim Good, Simon Dixon, Kathleen Baster, Wendy Tindale, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair
{"title":"谢菲尔德自适应模式电刺激疗法(SHAPES)治疗中风后手臂痉挛:三臂、部分盲法、随机对照试验的研究方案。","authors":"Ali Ali, Avril D McCarthy, Mark Reeves, Jamie Healey, Louise Moody, Adewale Adebajo, Tim Good, Simon Dixon, Kathleen Baster, Wendy Tindale, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03635-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post stroke elbow spasticity (PSES) affects over a third of individuals following stroke and negatively impacts on functional recovery, comfort and quality of life. Drug therapies have limited efficacy and unwanted side effects, botulinum toxin, although effective, is costly, and conventional electrical stimulation therapies are limited long term by habituation. We aim to investigate the efficacy of Sheffield Adaptive Patterned Electrical Stimulation (SHAPES), that delivers temporally and spatially varying pattern of electrical stimulation, against transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) and standard care at reducing PSES.</p><p><strong>Methods and design: </strong>Overall, 297 people with PSES will be randomised (1:1:1) to one of 3 arms: Standard care (no electrical stimulation), TENS (conventional patterned electrical stimulation) or SHAPES (adaptive patterned electrical stimulation). Both SHAPES and TENS are delivered using a specially designed electrical stimulation sleeve used for 60 min each day for 6-weeks. Outcome measures are completed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT 6 weeks) and then 6-weeks, 12-weeks and 24-weeks after the end of treatment. Efficacy will be determined based on the proportion of participants experiencing meaningful improvement (18%) in the 7-day Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-S) for PSES, compared between both intervention arms and standard care, and between the two intervention groups. Measures of arm motor function (Action Research Arm Test, MRC scale), and quality of life (SQoL-6D, EQ-5D) will also be measured along with a parallel health economic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of the SHAPES trial will inform management of elbow spasticity after stroke. The SHAPES intervention is a low cost, self-administered intervention for the management of spasticity that can be used repeatedly, and if found to be more effective than TENS or control has the potential to be widely implemented in the UK NHS healthcare setting. Furthermore, despite the wide use of TENS in the management of spasticity, this study will provide critically required evidence regarding its efficacy. The trial has been registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN26060261).</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"24 1","pages":"437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sheffield Adaptive Patterned Electrical Stimulation (SHAPES) Therapy for Post Stroke Arm spasticity: study protocol for a 3-arm, a partially blinded, randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Ali, Avril D McCarthy, Mark Reeves, Jamie Healey, Louise Moody, Adewale Adebajo, Tim Good, Simon Dixon, Kathleen Baster, Wendy Tindale, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12883-024-03635-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post stroke elbow spasticity (PSES) affects over a third of individuals following stroke and negatively impacts on functional recovery, comfort and quality of life. Drug therapies have limited efficacy and unwanted side effects, botulinum toxin, although effective, is costly, and conventional electrical stimulation therapies are limited long term by habituation. We aim to investigate the efficacy of Sheffield Adaptive Patterned Electrical Stimulation (SHAPES), that delivers temporally and spatially varying pattern of electrical stimulation, against transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) and standard care at reducing PSES.</p><p><strong>Methods and design: </strong>Overall, 297 people with PSES will be randomised (1:1:1) to one of 3 arms: Standard care (no electrical stimulation), TENS (conventional patterned electrical stimulation) or SHAPES (adaptive patterned electrical stimulation). Both SHAPES and TENS are delivered using a specially designed electrical stimulation sleeve used for 60 min each day for 6-weeks. Outcome measures are completed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT 6 weeks) and then 6-weeks, 12-weeks and 24-weeks after the end of treatment. Efficacy will be determined based on the proportion of participants experiencing meaningful improvement (18%) in the 7-day Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-S) for PSES, compared between both intervention arms and standard care, and between the two intervention groups. Measures of arm motor function (Action Research Arm Test, MRC scale), and quality of life (SQoL-6D, EQ-5D) will also be measured along with a parallel health economic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of the SHAPES trial will inform management of elbow spasticity after stroke. The SHAPES intervention is a low cost, self-administered intervention for the management of spasticity that can be used repeatedly, and if found to be more effective than TENS or control has the potential to be widely implemented in the UK NHS healthcare setting. Furthermore, despite the wide use of TENS in the management of spasticity, this study will provide critically required evidence regarding its efficacy. The trial has been registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN26060261).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549865/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03635-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03635-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:超过三分之一的中风患者在中风后会出现肘部痉挛(PSES),对功能恢复、舒适度和生活质量造成负面影响。药物疗法疗效有限,且有副作用,肉毒杆菌毒素虽然有效,但成本高昂,而传统的电刺激疗法则因习惯性而受到长期限制。我们旨在研究谢菲尔德自适应模式电刺激(SHAPES)与经皮电刺激(TENS)和标准护理相比在减少 PSES 方面的疗效:总共有 297 名 PSES 患者将被随机(1:1:1)分配到 3 个治疗组中的一个:标准护理(无电刺激)、TENS(传统模式电刺激)或 SHAPES(自适应模式电刺激)。SHAPES 和 TENS 均使用专门设计的电刺激套,每天 60 分钟,持续 6 周。结果测量在基线、治疗结束(EOT 6 周)以及治疗结束后的 6 周、12 周和 24 周完成。疗效将根据干预组与标准护理组之间以及干预组与标准护理组之间在 7 天的 PSES 数字评定量表(NRS-S)中获得有意义改善(18%)的参与者比例来确定。此外,还将测量手臂运动功能(行动研究手臂测试、MRC量表)和生活质量(SQoL-6D、EQ-5D),并同时进行健康经济评估:讨论:SHAPES 试验的结果将为中风后肘部痉挛的治疗提供参考。SHAPES干预是一种可反复使用的低成本、自我管理的痉挛管理干预方法,如果发现它比TENS或对照组更有效,则有可能在英国国家医疗服务体系的医疗环境中广泛实施。此外,尽管 TENS 被广泛用于痉挛的治疗,但这项研究将为其疗效提供急需的证据。该试验已在 ISRCTN 注册中心注册(ISRCTN26060261)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sheffield Adaptive Patterned Electrical Stimulation (SHAPES) Therapy for Post Stroke Arm spasticity: study protocol for a 3-arm, a partially blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Introduction: Post stroke elbow spasticity (PSES) affects over a third of individuals following stroke and negatively impacts on functional recovery, comfort and quality of life. Drug therapies have limited efficacy and unwanted side effects, botulinum toxin, although effective, is costly, and conventional electrical stimulation therapies are limited long term by habituation. We aim to investigate the efficacy of Sheffield Adaptive Patterned Electrical Stimulation (SHAPES), that delivers temporally and spatially varying pattern of electrical stimulation, against transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) and standard care at reducing PSES.

Methods and design: Overall, 297 people with PSES will be randomised (1:1:1) to one of 3 arms: Standard care (no electrical stimulation), TENS (conventional patterned electrical stimulation) or SHAPES (adaptive patterned electrical stimulation). Both SHAPES and TENS are delivered using a specially designed electrical stimulation sleeve used for 60 min each day for 6-weeks. Outcome measures are completed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT 6 weeks) and then 6-weeks, 12-weeks and 24-weeks after the end of treatment. Efficacy will be determined based on the proportion of participants experiencing meaningful improvement (18%) in the 7-day Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-S) for PSES, compared between both intervention arms and standard care, and between the two intervention groups. Measures of arm motor function (Action Research Arm Test, MRC scale), and quality of life (SQoL-6D, EQ-5D) will also be measured along with a parallel health economic evaluation.

Discussion: The results of the SHAPES trial will inform management of elbow spasticity after stroke. The SHAPES intervention is a low cost, self-administered intervention for the management of spasticity that can be used repeatedly, and if found to be more effective than TENS or control has the potential to be widely implemented in the UK NHS healthcare setting. Furthermore, despite the wide use of TENS in the management of spasticity, this study will provide critically required evidence regarding its efficacy. The trial has been registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN26060261).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信