支持幼儿认知功能所需的最佳睡眠、久坐行为和体育活动水平。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Samah Zahran, Dylan P Cliff, Devan Antczak, Eivind Aadland, Katrine N Aadland, Jade Burley, Valerie Carson, Catherine E Draper, Dorothea Dumuid, Nicholas Kuzik, Diego Augusto Santos Silva, Esther M F van Sluijs, Mark S Tremblay, Timothy S Olds, Anthony D Okely, Rebecca Stanley, Rute Santos, Ian Janssen
{"title":"支持幼儿认知功能所需的最佳睡眠、久坐行为和体育活动水平。","authors":"Samah Zahran, Dylan P Cliff, Devan Antczak, Eivind Aadland, Katrine N Aadland, Jade Burley, Valerie Carson, Catherine E Draper, Dorothea Dumuid, Nicholas Kuzik, Diego Augusto Santos Silva, Esther M F van Sluijs, Mark S Tremblay, Timothy S Olds, Anthony D Okely, Rebecca Stanley, Rute Santos, Ian Janssen","doi":"10.1186/s12887-024-05186-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep, sedentary behaviour, physical activity, and the composition of these movement behaviours across the 24-h day are associated with cognitive function in early years children. This study used a Goldilocks day compositional data analysis approach to identify the optimal duration of sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity associated with desired cognitive function outcomes in early years children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 858 children aged 2.8-5.5 years from the Sleep and Activity Database for the Early Years. 24-h movement behaviours (sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) were measured using ActiGraph accelerometers. Cognitive function was measured using three tasks from the Early Years Toolbox: visual-spatial working memory, response inhibition, and expressive vocabulary. A Goldilocks day compositional data analysis approach was used in R software to identify the optimal time-use compositions associated with the best 10% of the cognitive function scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The movement behaviour composition and the relative time spent in sleep and sedentary behaviour but not different intensities of physical activity were significantly associated with working memory (P ≤ 0.01). The movement behaviour composition and relative time spent in sleep, sedentary behaviour, and different intensities of physical activity were not significantly associated with response inhibition or expressive vocabulary (P > 0.2). Therefore, optimal time use was only determined for working memory. Optimal daily durations for working memory were observed with 11:00 (hr:min) of sleep, 5:42 of sedentary behaviour, 5:06 of light physical activity, and 2:12 of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Working memory was the only cognitive function outcome related to the 24-h movement behaviour composition. Optimal sleep for working memory was consistent with current recommended durations, while optimal moderate-to-vigorous physical activity greatly exceeded minimal recommended levels. Optimal sedentary behaviour was longer and light physical activity was shorter than the sample average.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal levels of sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity needed to support cognitive function in children of the early years.\",\"authors\":\"Samah Zahran, Dylan P Cliff, Devan Antczak, Eivind Aadland, Katrine N Aadland, Jade Burley, Valerie Carson, Catherine E Draper, Dorothea Dumuid, Nicholas Kuzik, Diego Augusto Santos Silva, Esther M F van Sluijs, Mark S Tremblay, Timothy S Olds, Anthony D Okely, Rebecca Stanley, Rute Santos, Ian Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12887-024-05186-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep, sedentary behaviour, physical activity, and the composition of these movement behaviours across the 24-h day are associated with cognitive function in early years children. This study used a Goldilocks day compositional data analysis approach to identify the optimal duration of sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity associated with desired cognitive function outcomes in early years children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 858 children aged 2.8-5.5 years from the Sleep and Activity Database for the Early Years. 24-h movement behaviours (sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) were measured using ActiGraph accelerometers. Cognitive function was measured using three tasks from the Early Years Toolbox: visual-spatial working memory, response inhibition, and expressive vocabulary. A Goldilocks day compositional data analysis approach was used in R software to identify the optimal time-use compositions associated with the best 10% of the cognitive function scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The movement behaviour composition and the relative time spent in sleep and sedentary behaviour but not different intensities of physical activity were significantly associated with working memory (P ≤ 0.01). The movement behaviour composition and relative time spent in sleep, sedentary behaviour, and different intensities of physical activity were not significantly associated with response inhibition or expressive vocabulary (P > 0.2). Therefore, optimal time use was only determined for working memory. Optimal daily durations for working memory were observed with 11:00 (hr:min) of sleep, 5:42 of sedentary behaviour, 5:06 of light physical activity, and 2:12 of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Working memory was the only cognitive function outcome related to the 24-h movement behaviour composition. Optimal sleep for working memory was consistent with current recommended durations, while optimal moderate-to-vigorous physical activity greatly exceeded minimal recommended levels. Optimal sedentary behaviour was longer and light physical activity was shorter than the sample average.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05186-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05186-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:睡眠、久坐行为、体力活动以及这些运动行为在一天 24 小时中的构成与幼儿的认知功能有关。本研究采用 "金发姑娘 "日组成数据分析方法,以确定与幼儿预期认知功能结果相关的睡眠、久坐行为、轻度体力活动和中度至剧烈体力活动的最佳持续时间:这项横断面研究包括来自幼儿睡眠与活动数据库的 858 名 2.8-5.5 岁儿童。使用 ActiGraph 加速计测量了 24 小时的运动行为(睡眠、久坐行为、轻体力活动、中到剧烈体力活动)。认知功能使用幼儿工具箱中的三项任务进行测量:视觉空间工作记忆、反应抑制和词汇表达。利用 R 软件中的 "金发姑娘日 "构成数据分析方法,确定了与认知功能得分最佳 10% 相关的最佳时间使用构成:结果:运动行为构成以及睡眠和久坐行为所花费的相对时间与工作记忆有显著相关性(P≤0.01),而不同强度的体育活动与工作记忆没有显著相关性(P≤0.01)。运动行为构成、睡眠相对时间、久坐行为以及不同强度的体力活动与反应抑制或词汇表达能力没有明显关联(P > 0.2)。因此,只确定了工作记忆的最佳时间使用。工作记忆的最佳日睡眠时间为11:00(小时:分钟),久坐不动的时间为5:42,轻度体力活动时间为5:06,中强度体力活动时间为2:12:工作记忆是唯一与 24 小时运动行为构成相关的认知功能结果。工作记忆的最佳睡眠时间与目前推荐的睡眠时间一致,而最佳中强度体育活动大大超过了推荐的最低水平。与样本平均水平相比,最佳久坐行为时间更长,而轻度体力活动时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal levels of sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity needed to support cognitive function in children of the early years.

Background: Sleep, sedentary behaviour, physical activity, and the composition of these movement behaviours across the 24-h day are associated with cognitive function in early years children. This study used a Goldilocks day compositional data analysis approach to identify the optimal duration of sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity associated with desired cognitive function outcomes in early years children.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 858 children aged 2.8-5.5 years from the Sleep and Activity Database for the Early Years. 24-h movement behaviours (sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) were measured using ActiGraph accelerometers. Cognitive function was measured using three tasks from the Early Years Toolbox: visual-spatial working memory, response inhibition, and expressive vocabulary. A Goldilocks day compositional data analysis approach was used in R software to identify the optimal time-use compositions associated with the best 10% of the cognitive function scores.

Results: The movement behaviour composition and the relative time spent in sleep and sedentary behaviour but not different intensities of physical activity were significantly associated with working memory (P ≤ 0.01). The movement behaviour composition and relative time spent in sleep, sedentary behaviour, and different intensities of physical activity were not significantly associated with response inhibition or expressive vocabulary (P > 0.2). Therefore, optimal time use was only determined for working memory. Optimal daily durations for working memory were observed with 11:00 (hr:min) of sleep, 5:42 of sedentary behaviour, 5:06 of light physical activity, and 2:12 of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

Conclusion: Working memory was the only cognitive function outcome related to the 24-h movement behaviour composition. Optimal sleep for working memory was consistent with current recommended durations, while optimal moderate-to-vigorous physical activity greatly exceeded minimal recommended levels. Optimal sedentary behaviour was longer and light physical activity was shorter than the sample average.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信