胎龄不足足月新生儿的运动能力:系统综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Hoda Taiar, Silje Dahl Benum, Kristina Anna Djupvik Aakvik, Kari Anne I Evensen
{"title":"胎龄不足足月新生儿的运动能力:系统综述。","authors":"Hoda Taiar, Silje Dahl Benum, Kristina Anna Djupvik Aakvik, Kari Anne I Evensen","doi":"10.1186/s12887-024-05187-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is a risk factor for motor difficulties. Previous reviews exploring this topic are mostly focused on children born preterm. We aimed to review the literature to determine the association between being born SGA at term and motor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles without any restrictions on publication year or participants' age. Inclusion criteria were SGA exposure at term (≥ 37 weeks of gestation), cohort studies or randomized controlled trials with motor outcome assessed by standardized motor tests with results reported as continuous scores (mean/median) compared with a control group. Exclusion criteria were abstracts, editorials and commentaries, articles in non-English language or no full text available. Reviews were screened for relevant articles. Quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 674 records were identified by the literature search and screened by two independent authors. Thirteen original articles were eligible and included in a qualitative synthesis, and five (38%) of these were included in a meta-analysis. Nine (69%) studies were from high-income countries. Most studies were carried out in early childhood, and only one study in adulthood. Seven (54%) articles reported that individuals born SGA at term had poorer scores on standardized motor tests compared with controls, while no differences were reported in five (38%) articles. One article did not report p-values, although the differences were comparable to the other studies. Group differences were of small to moderate effect size (0.19 to 0.65 standard deviation units). The pooled effect size was -0.43 (95% confidence interval: -0.60 to -0.25). Adjustment for covariates were reported in seven (54%) articles and did not change the results. Proportions of motor difficulties, reported in five (38%) articles, ranged from 8.9 to 50% in individuals born SGA from infancy to adolescence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review shows that being born SGA, also at term, may be a risk factor for poorer motor outcomes throughout childhood, confirmed by a meta-analysis in early childhood. Further research is needed to establish the risk of adult motor difficulties in individuals born SGA at term.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motor outcomes in individuals born small for gestational age at term: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Hoda Taiar, Silje Dahl Benum, Kristina Anna Djupvik Aakvik, Kari Anne I Evensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12887-024-05187-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is a risk factor for motor difficulties. Previous reviews exploring this topic are mostly focused on children born preterm. We aimed to review the literature to determine the association between being born SGA at term and motor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles without any restrictions on publication year or participants' age. Inclusion criteria were SGA exposure at term (≥ 37 weeks of gestation), cohort studies or randomized controlled trials with motor outcome assessed by standardized motor tests with results reported as continuous scores (mean/median) compared with a control group. Exclusion criteria were abstracts, editorials and commentaries, articles in non-English language or no full text available. Reviews were screened for relevant articles. Quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 674 records were identified by the literature search and screened by two independent authors. Thirteen original articles were eligible and included in a qualitative synthesis, and five (38%) of these were included in a meta-analysis. Nine (69%) studies were from high-income countries. Most studies were carried out in early childhood, and only one study in adulthood. Seven (54%) articles reported that individuals born SGA at term had poorer scores on standardized motor tests compared with controls, while no differences were reported in five (38%) articles. One article did not report p-values, although the differences were comparable to the other studies. Group differences were of small to moderate effect size (0.19 to 0.65 standard deviation units). The pooled effect size was -0.43 (95% confidence interval: -0.60 to -0.25). Adjustment for covariates were reported in seven (54%) articles and did not change the results. Proportions of motor difficulties, reported in five (38%) articles, ranged from 8.9 to 50% in individuals born SGA from infancy to adolescence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review shows that being born SGA, also at term, may be a risk factor for poorer motor outcomes throughout childhood, confirmed by a meta-analysis in early childhood. Further research is needed to establish the risk of adult motor difficulties in individuals born SGA at term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05187-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05187-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胎龄不足(SGA)是导致运动障碍的一个危险因素。以往探讨这一主题的综述大多集中在早产儿身上。我们旨在回顾文献,以确定足月出生的 SGA 儿童与运动结果之间的关联:方法:我们在 PubMed 和 Embase 上搜索了相关文章,对发表年份或参与者年龄没有任何限制。纳入标准为足月(妊娠≥ 37 周)时暴露于 SGA、队列研究或随机对照试验,运动结果通过标准化运动测试进行评估,测试结果以连续得分(平均分/中位数)的形式报告,并与对照组进行比较。排除标准为摘要、社论和评论、非英语文章或无全文。对相关文章的综述进行了筛选。纳入研究的质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估:文献检索共发现 674 条记录,并由两位独立作者进行了筛选。有 13 篇原创文章符合条件并被纳入定性综述,其中 5 篇(38%)被纳入荟萃分析。九项研究(69%)来自高收入国家。大多数研究是在幼儿期进行的,只有一项研究是在成年期进行的。有七篇(54%)文章报告称,与对照组相比,足月出生的 SGA 患儿在标准化运动测试中的得分较低,而有五篇(38%)文章报告称两者之间没有差异。有一篇文章没有报告 p 值,尽管其差异与其他研究相当。组间差异具有小到中等的效应大小(0.19 到 0.65 个标准差单位)。汇总效应大小为-0.43(95% 置信区间:-0.60 至-0.25)。7篇文章(54%)报告了对协变量的调整,但并未改变结果。5篇文章(38%)报告了运动障碍的比例,在婴儿期至青春期出生的SGA患者中,运动障碍的比例从8.9%到50%不等:本系统综述表明,出生时即为 SGA(也包括足月出生)可能是导致儿童期运动能力较差的一个风险因素,幼儿期的荟萃分析也证实了这一点。要确定足月出生 SGA 患儿成年后出现运动障碍的风险,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motor outcomes in individuals born small for gestational age at term: a systematic review.

Background: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is a risk factor for motor difficulties. Previous reviews exploring this topic are mostly focused on children born preterm. We aimed to review the literature to determine the association between being born SGA at term and motor outcomes.

Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles without any restrictions on publication year or participants' age. Inclusion criteria were SGA exposure at term (≥ 37 weeks of gestation), cohort studies or randomized controlled trials with motor outcome assessed by standardized motor tests with results reported as continuous scores (mean/median) compared with a control group. Exclusion criteria were abstracts, editorials and commentaries, articles in non-English language or no full text available. Reviews were screened for relevant articles. Quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results: In total, 674 records were identified by the literature search and screened by two independent authors. Thirteen original articles were eligible and included in a qualitative synthesis, and five (38%) of these were included in a meta-analysis. Nine (69%) studies were from high-income countries. Most studies were carried out in early childhood, and only one study in adulthood. Seven (54%) articles reported that individuals born SGA at term had poorer scores on standardized motor tests compared with controls, while no differences were reported in five (38%) articles. One article did not report p-values, although the differences were comparable to the other studies. Group differences were of small to moderate effect size (0.19 to 0.65 standard deviation units). The pooled effect size was -0.43 (95% confidence interval: -0.60 to -0.25). Adjustment for covariates were reported in seven (54%) articles and did not change the results. Proportions of motor difficulties, reported in five (38%) articles, ranged from 8.9 to 50% in individuals born SGA from infancy to adolescence.

Conclusions: This systematic review shows that being born SGA, also at term, may be a risk factor for poorer motor outcomes throughout childhood, confirmed by a meta-analysis in early childhood. Further research is needed to establish the risk of adult motor difficulties in individuals born SGA at term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信