ACE2在Sprague-Dawley大鼠和培养的原代脑周细胞中表达的体内特征突出表明了鼠脑在研究COVID-19脑病理生理学中的实用性。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Eugene Park, Elaine Liu, Andrew J Baker
{"title":"ACE2在Sprague-Dawley大鼠和培养的原代脑周细胞中表达的体内特征突出表明了鼠脑在研究COVID-19脑病理生理学中的实用性。","authors":"Eugene Park, Elaine Liu, Andrew J Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A high number of COVID-19 patients report ongoing neurological impairments including headache, fatigue and memory impairments. Our understanding of COVID-19 disease mechanisms in the brain is limited and relies on post-mortem human tissues, in vitro studies in various cell lines (both human and animal) as well as preclinical studies in a variety of species. Notably the use of rats in the study of COVID-19 has been scarce in part due to early reports of low infectivity of the original Wuhan strain in mice and rats. Evidence has shown that subsequent strains that have mutated from the original strain and are capable of infection in rats. Here we present an immunohistological characterization of ACE2 expression in the rat brain perivascular region. We found ACE2 to be expressed in pericytes but not endothelial cells or astrocytes in the perivascular space. We further examined the uptake of Omicron variants 1.1.529 and BA.2 receptor binding domains (RBD) of the SARS-CoV2 spike protein in primary brain pericytes derived from rats. We demonstrate that rat primary brain pericytes are susceptible to SARS-CoV2 spike protein uptake and induce functional changes in pericytes associated with a reduction in tight junction protein expression. These data provide evidence that rat primary cell responses to SARS-CoV2 infection are consistent with reports of infectivity in other species (transgenic mice expressing hACE2, ferrets, hamsters) and supports the use of this model organism with a long history of use in the study of disease which should be leveraged for study of COVID-19 in the brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"149333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo characterization of ACE2 expression in Sprague-Dawley rats and cultured primary brain pericytes highlights the utility of Rattus norvegicus in the study of COVID-19 brain pathophysiology.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Park, Elaine Liu, Andrew J Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A high number of COVID-19 patients report ongoing neurological impairments including headache, fatigue and memory impairments. Our understanding of COVID-19 disease mechanisms in the brain is limited and relies on post-mortem human tissues, in vitro studies in various cell lines (both human and animal) as well as preclinical studies in a variety of species. Notably the use of rats in the study of COVID-19 has been scarce in part due to early reports of low infectivity of the original Wuhan strain in mice and rats. Evidence has shown that subsequent strains that have mutated from the original strain and are capable of infection in rats. Here we present an immunohistological characterization of ACE2 expression in the rat brain perivascular region. We found ACE2 to be expressed in pericytes but not endothelial cells or astrocytes in the perivascular space. We further examined the uptake of Omicron variants 1.1.529 and BA.2 receptor binding domains (RBD) of the SARS-CoV2 spike protein in primary brain pericytes derived from rats. We demonstrate that rat primary brain pericytes are susceptible to SARS-CoV2 spike protein uptake and induce functional changes in pericytes associated with a reduction in tight junction protein expression. These data provide evidence that rat primary cell responses to SARS-CoV2 infection are consistent with reports of infectivity in other species (transgenic mice expressing hACE2, ferrets, hamsters) and supports the use of this model organism with a long history of use in the study of disease which should be leveraged for study of COVID-19 in the brain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很多 COVID-19 患者都报告了持续的神经系统损伤,包括头痛、疲劳和记忆力减退。我们对 COVID-19 在大脑中的发病机制了解有限,主要依赖于死后人体组织、各种细胞系(人类和动物)的体外研究以及各种物种的临床前研究。值得注意的是,在 COVID-19 的研究中很少使用大鼠,部分原因是早期有报告称最初的武汉毒株在小鼠和大鼠中的感染率较低。有证据表明,从原始菌株变异而来的后续菌株能够感染大鼠。在此,我们对大鼠脑血管周围区域 ACE2 的表达进行了免疫组织学鉴定。我们发现 ACE2 在血管周围区域的周细胞中表达,但不包括内皮细胞或星形胶质细胞。我们进一步研究了大鼠原代脑周细胞对 SARS-CoV2 穗状病毒蛋白的 Omicron 变体 1.1.529 和 BA.2 受体结合域(RBD)的吸收情况。我们的研究表明,大鼠原代脑周细胞容易摄取 SARS-CoV2 穗状病毒蛋白,并诱发与紧密连接蛋白表达减少有关的脑周细胞功能变化。这些数据证明,大鼠原代细胞对 SARS-CoV2 感染的反应与其他物种(表达 hACE2 的转基因小鼠、雪貂、仓鼠)的感染性报告一致,并支持使用这种具有悠久疾病研究历史的模型生物体来研究 COVID-19 在大脑中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vivo characterization of ACE2 expression in Sprague-Dawley rats and cultured primary brain pericytes highlights the utility of Rattus norvegicus in the study of COVID-19 brain pathophysiology.

A high number of COVID-19 patients report ongoing neurological impairments including headache, fatigue and memory impairments. Our understanding of COVID-19 disease mechanisms in the brain is limited and relies on post-mortem human tissues, in vitro studies in various cell lines (both human and animal) as well as preclinical studies in a variety of species. Notably the use of rats in the study of COVID-19 has been scarce in part due to early reports of low infectivity of the original Wuhan strain in mice and rats. Evidence has shown that subsequent strains that have mutated from the original strain and are capable of infection in rats. Here we present an immunohistological characterization of ACE2 expression in the rat brain perivascular region. We found ACE2 to be expressed in pericytes but not endothelial cells or astrocytes in the perivascular space. We further examined the uptake of Omicron variants 1.1.529 and BA.2 receptor binding domains (RBD) of the SARS-CoV2 spike protein in primary brain pericytes derived from rats. We demonstrate that rat primary brain pericytes are susceptible to SARS-CoV2 spike protein uptake and induce functional changes in pericytes associated with a reduction in tight junction protein expression. These data provide evidence that rat primary cell responses to SARS-CoV2 infection are consistent with reports of infectivity in other species (transgenic mice expressing hACE2, ferrets, hamsters) and supports the use of this model organism with a long history of use in the study of disease which should be leveraged for study of COVID-19 in the brain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信